Object properties and cognitive load in the formation of associative memory during precision lifting

When we manipulate familiar objects in our daily life, our grip force anticipates the physical demands right from the moment of contact with the object, indicating the existence of a memory for relevant object properties. This study explores the formation and consolidation of the memory processes that associate either familiar (size) or arbitrary object features (color) with object weight. In the general task, participants repetitively lifted two differently weighted objects (580 and 280 g) in a pseudo-random order. Forty young healthy adults participated in this study and were randomly distributed into four groups: Color Cue Single task (CCS, blue and red, 9.8(3)cm(3)), Color Cue Dual task (CCD), No Cue (NC) and Size Cue (SC, 9.8(3) and 6(3)cm(3)) group. All groups performed a repetitive precision grasp-lift task and were retested with the same protocol after a 5-min pause. The CCD group was also required to simultaneously perform a memory task during each lift of differently weighted objects coded by color. The results show that groups lifting objects with arbitrary or familiar features successfully formed the association between object weight and manipulated object features and incorporated this into grip force programming, as observed in the different scaling of grip force and grip force rate for different object weights. An arbitrary feature, i.e., color, can be sufficiently associated with object weight, however with less strength than the familiar feature of size. The simultaneous memory task impaired anticipatory force scaling during repetitive object lifting but did not jeopardize the learning process and the consolidation of the associative memory.

[1]  R. Johansson,et al.  Visual size cues in the programming of manipulative forces during precision grip , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  A. M. Smith,et al.  Friction, not texture, dictates grip forces used during object manipulation. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  Hans Forssberg,et al.  Formation and lateralization of internal representations underlying motor commands during precision grip , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  A. Longoni,et al.  Problems in the Assessment of Hand Preference , 1985, Cortex.

[5]  M. Goodale,et al.  Dual-task interference is greater in delayed grasping than in visually guided grasping. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[6]  R. Johansson,et al.  Tangential torque effects on the control of grip forces when holding objects with a precision grip. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  Sarah H. Creem,et al.  Grasping objects by their handles: a necessary interaction between cognition and action. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  R. Johansson,et al.  Integration of sensory information during the programming of precision grip: comments on the contributions of size cues , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  R S Johansson,et al.  Development of human precision grip , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  I Salimi,et al.  Specificity of internal representations underlying grasping. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  G. Fink,et al.  Predictive force programming in the grip-lift task: The role of memory links between arbitrary cues and object weight , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  D. Nowak,et al.  Grip force control during object manipulation in cerebral stroke , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[13]  Joachim Hermsdörfer,et al.  Formation and decay of sensorimotor and associative memory in object lifting , 2007, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[14]  K. J. Cole,et al.  Memory representations underlying motor commands used during manipulation of common and novel objects. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  P Jenmalm,et al.  Visual and Somatosensory Information about Object Shape Control Manipulative Fingertip Forces , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  D. Westwood,et al.  Opposite perceptual and sensorimotor responses to a size-weight illusion. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Encyclopedia of the Human Brain , 2002 .

[18]  Roland S. Johansson,et al.  Sensory Control of Dexterous Manipulation in Humans , 1996 .

[19]  J. Flanagan,et al.  Independence of perceptual and sensorimotor predictions in the size–weight illusion , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  R. S. Johansson,et al.  Roles of glabrous skin receptors and sensorimotor memory in automatic control of precision grip when lifting rougher or more slippery objects , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  K. J. Cole Lifting a familiar object: visual size analysis, not memory for object weight, scales lift force , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  R. Johansson,et al.  Sensorimotor prediction and memory in object manipulation. , 2001, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[23]  K. J. Cole,et al.  Old age impairs the use of arbitrary visual cues for predictive control of fingertip forces during grasp , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  H. Carnahan,et al.  Practice Effects on the Use of Visual and Haptic Cues During Grasping , 2004, Journal of motor behavior.

[25]  R. Johansson,et al.  Coordinated isometric muscle commands adequately and erroneously programmed for the weight during lifting task with precision grip , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[26]  Katsumi Aoki,et al.  Recent development of flow visualization , 2004, J. Vis..