Self-Regulation of Priming Effects on Behavior

In three experiments, we tested whether people can protect their ongoing goal pursuits from antagonistic priming effects by using if-then plans (i.e., implementation intentions). In Experiment 1, concept priming did not influence lexical decision time for a critical stimulus when participants had formed if-then plans to make fast responses to that stimulus. In Experiment 2, participants who were primed with a prosocial goal allowed a confederate who asked for help to interrupt their work on a focal task for a longer time if they had merely formed goal intentions to perform well than if they had also formed implementation intentions for concentrating on the task. In Experiment 3, priming the goal of being fast increased driving speed and errors for participants who had formed mere goal intentions to drive only as fast as safety allowed or who had formed no goal intentions, whereas the driving of participants who had formed such goal intentions as well as implementation intentions showed no such priming effects. Our findings indicate that implementation intentions are an effective self-regulatory tool for shielding actions from disruptive concept- or goal-priming effects.

[1]  P. Gollwitzer,et al.  Staying on track: Planned goal striving is protected from disruptive internal states , 2010 .

[2]  Anna-Lisa Cohen,et al.  Separable brain systems supporting cued versus self-initiated realization of delayed intentions. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  Anja Achtziger,et al.  Responding to subliminal cues: Do if-then plans facilitate action preparation and initiation without conscious intent? , 2009 .

[4]  P. Sheeran,et al.  Mechanisms of implementation intention effects: the role of goal intentions, self-efficacy, and accessibility of plan components. , 2008, The British journal of social psychology.

[5]  T. Meyer,et al.  Blonde Like Me: When Self-Construals Moderate Stereotype Priming Effects on Intellectual Performance , 2008 .

[6]  Gabriele Oettingen,et al.  Goal Setting and Goal Striving , 2007 .

[7]  Gabriele Oettingen,et al.  Action control by implementation intentions : effective cue detection and efficient response initiation , 2007 .

[8]  P. Sheeran,et al.  How do implementation intentions promote goal attainment? A test of component processes , 2007 .

[9]  P. Gollwitzer,et al.  Nonconscious goal pursuit: Acting in an explanatory vacuum , 2006 .

[10]  L. Nordenfelt.  Reply to the commentaries , 2006 .

[11]  Kenneth G. DeMarree,et al.  Priming a new identity: self-monitoring moderates the effects of nonself primes on self-judgments and behavior. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  Kai Sassenberg,et al.  Don't stereotype, think different! Overcoming automatic stereotype activation by mindset priming , 2005 .

[13]  Thomas L. Webb,et al.  Identifying good opportunities to act: Implementation intentions and cue discrimination , 2004 .

[14]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Unconscious Masked Priming Depends on Temporal Attention , 2002, Psychological science.

[15]  H. Aarts,et al.  Category activation effects in judgment and behaviour: the moderating role of perceived comparability. , 2002, The British journal of social psychology.

[16]  J. Bargh,et al.  The automated will: nonconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  P. Gollwitzer,et al.  Implementation intentions and efficient action initiation. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[19]  M. Ferguson,et al.  Beyond behaviorism: on the automaticity of higher mental processes. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[20]  J. Bargh,et al.  On the Relation between Associative Strength and Automatic Behavior , 2000 .

[21]  S. Fiske,et al.  Moderation of Priming by Goals: Feeling Entitled to Judge Increases Judged Usability of Evaluative Primes , 2000 .

[22]  P. Gollwitzer.  Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. , 1999 .

[23]  C. Neil Macrae,et al.  HELP, I NEED SOMEBODY: AUTOMATIC ACTION AND INACTION , 1998 .

[24]  J. Bargh,et al.  Automaticity of social behavior: direct effects of trait construct and stereotype-activation on action. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Mental contamination and mental correction: unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[26]  H. Aarts,et al.  Goals, attention, and (un)consciousness. , 2010, Annual review of psychology.

[27]  N. Liberman,et al.  What do we prime? On distinguishing between semantic priming, procedural priming, and goal priming , 2009 .

[28]  P. Gollwitzer,et al.  Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes , 2006 .

[29]  Juliette Blevins,et al.  Reply to commentaries , 2006 .

[30]  Tom Postmes,et al.  Seeing One Thing and Doing Another : Contrast Effects in Automatic Behavior , 2004 .

[31]  J. Bargh,et al.  The perception–behavior expressway: Automatic effects of social perception on social behavior. , 2001 .

[32]  Tanya L. Chartrand,et al.  Automatic Activation of Impression Formation and Memorization Goals: Nonconscious Goal Priming Reproduces Effects of Explicit Task Instructions , 1996 .

[33]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intraindividual processes , 2001 .

[34]  P. Gollwitzer.  Goal Achievement: The Role of Intentions , 1993 .

[35]  John A. Bargh,et al.  Auto-motives: Preconscious determinants of social interaction. , 1990 .

[36]  Heinrich Düker,et al.  Über ein Verfahren zur Untersuchung der psychischen Leistungsfähigkeit , 1949 .

[37]  N. Lewis.  A dynamic theory of personality , 1935 .