Coexistence of Competitors in Patchy Environment

There are two implicit assumptions in Levins' (1969) metaphorical model of regional distribution: movements by individuals are possible between any two patches in the region, and the local time scale is much faster than the regional one. These assumptions are frequently incompatible. Levins' model is modified to allow for a varying difference between the local and regional time scales, and regional competition between two species is analyzed with the new model. The main results are that two like species may or may not coexist regionally, depending on the difference between the time scales (a large difference facilitates coexistence) and on the intensity of competition; a species' precompetitive distribution is a good predictor of its competitive success, just as the carrying capacity in the Lotka-Volterra model is a good predictor of success in local competition. Regional priority effect is possible, though unlikely when the time scales are very different. The local time scale is slower than the regional one in some organisms (e.g., orchids, ferns), which may survive regionally, although they may succeed in breeding only seldom. Two possible outcomes of regional competition are (1) a decrease in the fraction of habitat patches occupied by the competing species and (2) an increase in the proportion of regionally rare species, some of which may ultimately go extinct. I ask which of the two outcomes is more frequent in nature and suggest that the answer may depend on the time scales of local and regional population dynamics.

[1]  R. Macarthur,et al.  Competition among Fugitive Species in a Harlequin Environment , 1972 .

[2]  P. T. Fenchel,et al.  Theories of Populations in Biological Communities , 1977, Ecological Studies.

[3]  I. Hanski,et al.  Coexistence in a Patchy Environment: Three Species of Daphnia in Rock Pools , 1983 .

[4]  A Hastings,et al.  Spatial heterogeneity and the stability of predator-prey systems: predator-mediated coexistence. , 1978, Theoretical population biology.

[5]  M. Hassell The dynamics of arthropod predator-prey systems. , 1979, Monographs in population biology.

[6]  G. Nachman,et al.  A MATHEMATICAL MODEL OF THE FUNCTIONAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DENSITY AND SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF A POPULATION , 1981 .

[7]  E. Leigh,et al.  The average lifetime of a population in a varying environment. , 1981, Journal of theoretical biology.

[8]  J. Cohen A Markov Contingency-Table Model for Replicated Lotka-Volterra Systems Near Equilibrium , 1970, The American Naturalist.

[9]  R. May,et al.  Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[10]  S. Levin Dispersion and Population Interactions , 1974, The American Naturalist.

[11]  J. Harper Population Biology of Plants , 1979 .

[12]  Daniel Simberloff,et al.  Experimental Zoogeography of Islands: Effects of Island Size , 1976 .

[13]  Hal Caswell,et al.  Predator-Mediated Coexistence: A Nonequilibrium Model , 1978, The American Naturalist.

[14]  R. Taylor The relationship between density and distance of dispersing insects , 1978 .

[15]  B. Shorrocks,et al.  Competition on a Divided and Ephemeral Resource: A Simulation Model , 1981 .

[16]  M. Lloyd,et al.  On Reconciling Patchy Microspatial Distributions with Competition Models , 1980, The American Naturalist.

[17]  R. Levins,et al.  Regional Coexistence of Species and Competition between Rare Species. , 1971, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Montgomery Slatkin,et al.  Competition and Regional Coexistence , 1974 .

[19]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Theory of Island Biogeography , 1969 .

[20]  J. Roughgarden Theory of Population Genetics and Evolutionary Ecology: An Introduction , 1995 .

[21]  B P Zeigler,et al.  Persistence and patchiness of predator-prey systems induced by discrete event population exchange mechanisms. , 1977, Journal of theoretical biology.

[22]  J. Connell Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. , 1978, Science.

[23]  J. G. Skellam Random dispersal in theoretical populations , 1951, Biometrika.