Benefits of total body photography and digital dermatoscopy ("two-step method of digital follow-up") in the early diagnosis of melanoma in patients at high risk for melanoma.

BACKGROUND Early detection of melanoma is the best way to improve prognosis. Digital follow-up (DFU) programs of populations at high risk could be an efficient strategy for detecting early melanomas with low morbidity. OBJECTIVE We sought to report the added value of the use of the "two-step method" (digital total body photography and digital dermatoscopy). METHODS This was an analysis of the surveillance of 618 patients at high risk for melanoma included in our DFU program from 1999 to 2008. RESULTS A total of 11,396 lesions were monitored (mean 18.44/patient) during a median follow-up of 96 months (median 10 visits/patient). A total of 1152 lesions, 1.86 per patient, were excised. Almost 70% (798) were lesions previously registered at least twice, whereas 356 (30%) were detected and removed in the same visit. During follow-up, 98 melanomas (8.5% of excised lesions) were diagnosed in 78 patients (12.6%). In all, 53 melanomas were in situ (53.3%), whereas invasive (45) showed a Breslow index of less than 1 mm (median 0.5 mm) and none were ulcerated. LIMITATIONS Because there are no control groups we cannot determine if the combined use of total body photography and digital dermatoscopy is more beneficial than these techniques used separately. CONCLUSION DFU with total body photography and dermatoscopy in a selected population at high risk demonstrated the early detection of melanomas with a low rate of excisions. Long-term follow-up is required to allow the detection of slow-growing melanomas. Based on our 10-year experience, melanomas can be diagnosed at any time, suggesting that in a population at high risk for melanoma, DFU should be maintained over time.

[1]  J. Malvehy,et al.  Follow-up of melanocytic skin lesions with digital total-body photography and digital dermoscopy: a two-step method. , 2002, Clinics in dermatology.

[2]  S. Menzies,et al.  Short-term digital surface microscopic monitoring of atypical or changing melanocytic lesions. , 2001, Archives of dermatology.

[3]  H. Kittler,et al.  Follow-up of melanocytic skin lesions with digital epiluminescence microscopy: patterns of modifications observed in early melanoma, atypical nevi, and common nevi. , 2000, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[4]  Michael P Schön,et al.  Seven-point checklist for dermatoscopy: performance during 10 years of prospective surveillance of patients at increased melanoma risk. , 2010, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[5]  S. Florell,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Total Body and Dermatoscopic Photographic Monitoring of Nevi in Similar Patient Populations at Risk for Cutaneous Melanoma , 2010, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[6]  M. Haniffa,et al.  Melanomas arising from naevi and de novo melanomas — does origin matter? , 2007, The British journal of dermatology.

[7]  I Zalaudek,et al.  Slow‐growing melanoma: a dermoscopy follow‐up study , 2010, The British journal of dermatology.

[8]  G. Argenziano,et al.  Epiluminescence microscopy for the diagnosis of doubtful melanocytic skin lesions. Comparison of the ABCD rule of dermatoscopy and a new 7-point checklist based on pattern analysis. , 1998, Archives of dermatology.

[9]  I. Zalaudek,et al.  Dermoscopic monitoring of melanocytic skin lesions: clinical outcome and patient compliance vary according to follow‐up protocols , 2008, The British journal of dermatology.

[10]  W. Stolz,et al.  Long‐term dermoscopic follow‐up of melanocytic naevi: clinical outcome and patient compliance , 2003, The British journal of dermatology.

[11]  P. Christos,et al.  Evaluation of factors associated with skin self-examination. , 1999, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[12]  A. Blum,et al.  Surveillance of patients at high risk for cutaneous malignant melanoma using digital dermoscopy , 2005, The British journal of dermatology.

[13]  J. Malvehy,et al.  Role of the CDKN2A locus in patients with multiple primary melanomas. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  S. Menzies,et al.  Identification of clinically featureless incipient melanoma using sequential dermoscopy imaging. , 2006, Archives of dermatology.

[15]  K Wolff,et al.  In vivo epiluminescence microscopy of pigmented skin lesions. I. Pattern analysis of pigmented skin lesions. , 1987, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[16]  D. English,et al.  Incidence of new and changed nevi and melanomas detected using baseline images and dermoscopy in patients at high risk for melanoma. , 2005, Archives of dermatology.

[17]  B. Thiers,et al.  Dermoscopy compared with naked eye examination for the diagnosis of primary melanoma: a meta-analysis of studies performed in a clinical setting , 2009 .

[18]  A. Kopf,et al.  Detection of melanomas in patients followed up with total cutaneous examinations, total cutaneous photography, and dermoscopy. , 2004, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[19]  M. Lebwohl,et al.  Importance of complete cutaneous examination for the detection of malignant melanoma. , 1986, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[20]  H. Kittler,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy. , 2002, The Lancet. Oncology.

[21]  H. Haenssle,et al.  Selection of patients for long-term surveillance with digital dermoscopy by assessment of melanoma risk factors. , 2010, Archives of dermatology.

[22]  B. Thiers,et al.  Melanomas That Failed Dermoscopic Detection: A Combined Clinicodermoscopic Approach for Not Missing Melanoma , 2008 .

[23]  T Burgdorf,et al.  The ABCD rule of dermatoscopy does not apply to small melanocytic skin lesions. , 2001, Archives of dermatology.

[24]  J. Grichnik,et al.  Early melanoma detection: nonuniform dermoscopic features and growth. , 2003, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[25]  M. G. Fleming,et al.  Dermoscopy of pigmented skin lesions: results of a consensus meeting via the Internet. , 2003, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[26]  C. Begg,et al.  Screening for cutaneous melanoma by skin self-examination. , 1996, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[27]  H. Haenssle,et al.  Results from an observational trial: digital epiluminescence microscopy follow-up of atypical nevi increases the sensitivity and the chance of success of conventional dermoscopy in detecting melanoma. , 2006, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[28]  June K Robinson,et al.  Digital epiluminescence microscopy monitoring of high-risk patients. , 2004, Archives of dermatology.

[29]  A. Halpern Total body skin imaging as an aid to melanoma detection. , 2003, Seminars in cutaneous medicine and surgery.

[30]  Emir Veledar,et al.  The impact of total body photography on biopsy rate in patients from a pigmented lesion clinic. , 2007, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[31]  S. Florell,et al.  Digital Dermoscopic Monitoring of Atypical Nevi in Patients at Risk for Melanoma , 2007, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].