Saccadic and perceptual performance in visual search tasks. II. Letter discrimination.

Can the oculomotor system use shape cues to guide search saccades? Observers searched for target letters (D, U, or X) among distractors (the letter O in the discrimination task and blank locations in the detection task) in Gaussian white noise. We measured the accuracy of first saccadic responses on each trial and perceptual (i.e., button-press) responses in separate trials with the stimulus duration chosen so that the saccadic and perceptual processing times were matched. We calculated the relative efficiency of saccadic decisions compared with perceptual decisions, eta(rel) = (d'(sac)/d'(per))2. Relative efficiency was low but consistently greater than zero in discrimination tasks (15% +/- 6%) and high in detection tasks (60% +/- 10%). We conclude that the saccadic targeting system can use shape cues, but less efficiently than the perceptual system can.

[1]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Visual search: structure from noise , 2002, ETRA.

[2]  R. Krauzlis,et al.  Tracking with the mind’s eye , 1999, Trends in Neurosciences.

[3]  J. Rovamo,et al.  Michelson contrast, RMS contrast and energy of various spatial stimuli at threshold , 1993, Vision Research.

[4]  A B Watson,et al.  Visual detection of spatial contrast patterns: evaluation of five simple models. , 2000, Optics express.

[5]  D. Sparks.  The brainstem control of saccadic eye movements , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[6]  Eileen Kowler,et al.  The role of location probability in the programming of saccades: Implications for “center-of-gravity” tendencies , 1989, Vision Research.

[7]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  The visual filter mediating letter identification , 1994, Nature.

[8]  W. Becker,et al.  An analysis of the saccadic system by means of double step stimuli , 1979, Vision Research.

[9]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[10]  Miguel P Eckstein,et al.  Classification images: a tool to analyze visual strategies. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[11]  J. Findlay.  Saccade Target Selection During Visual Search , 1997, Vision Research.

[12]  D. E. Irwin,et al.  Our Eyes do Not Always Go Where we Want Them to Go: Capture of the Eyes by New Objects , 1998 .

[13]  G. Zelinsky.  Using Eye Saccades to Assess the Selectivity of Search Movements , 1996, Vision Research.

[14]  A. Ahumada.  Perceptual Classification Images from Vernier Acuity Masked by Noise , 1996 .

[15]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  Band-limited contrast in natural images explains the detectability of changes in the amplitude spectra , 1997, Vision Research.

[16]  R. Desimone,et al.  Prestriate afferents to inferior temporal cortex: an HRP study , 1980, Brain Research.

[17]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[18]  W. Geisler.  Sequential ideal-observer analysis of visual discriminations. , 1989, Psychological review.

[19]  Duane Q Nykamp,et al.  Full identification of a linear-nonlinear system via cross-correlation analysis. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[20]  P. Viviani,et al.  Saccadic eye movements to peripherally discriminated visual targets. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  T Moore,et al.  Shape representations and visual guidance of saccadic eye movements. , 1999, Science.

[22]  Jeffrey D Schall,et al.  The neural selection and control of saccades by the frontal eye field. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[23]  Christopher W. Tyler,et al.  One Eye is Usually Centred Horizontally (and near the Golden Section Vertically) in Portraits over the Past 500 Years , 1997 .

[24]  M P Eckstein,et al.  Classification images for saccadic targeting and perceptual decisions during search , 2002 .

[25]  Brent R. Beutter,et al.  Human motion perception and smooth eye movements slow similar directional biases for elongated apertures , 1998, Vision Research.

[26]  M. Eckstein,et al.  Quantifying the Performance Limits of Human Saccadic Targeting during Visual Search , 2001, Perception.

[27]  W. Fries.  Cortical projections to the superior colliculus in the macaque monkey: A retrograde study using horseradish peroxidase , 1984, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[28]  P. Whittle.  Increments and decrements: Luminance discrimination , 1986, Vision Research.

[29]  P. Bennett,et al.  Deriving behavioural receptive fields for visually completed contours , 2000, Current Biology.

[30]  M P Eckstein,et al.  Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds. II. Effects of contrast gain control, background variations, and white noise. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[31]  P H Schiller,et al.  Look and see: how the brain moves your eyes about. , 2001, Progress in brain research.

[32]  L G Williams,et al.  The effects of target specification on objects fixated during visual search. , 1967, Acta psychologica.

[33]  J. E. Albano,et al.  Visual-motor function of the primate superior colliculus. , 1980, Annual review of neuroscience.

[34]  Miguel P Eckstein,et al.  Saccadic and perceptual performance in visual search tasks. I. Contrast detection and discrimination. , 2003, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[35]  E. R. Cohen.  An Introduction to Error Analysis: The Study of Uncertainties in Physical Measurements , 1998 .

[36]  Miguel P Eckstein,et al.  The footprints of visual attention in the Posner cueing paradigm revealed by classification images. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[37]  Andrew B. Watson,et al.  A Rorschach Test for Visual Classification Strategies , 1996 .

[38]  W. W. Peterson,et al.  The theory of signal detectability , 1954, Trans. IRE Prof. Group Inf. Theory.