Design and analysis of lunar lander manual control modes

All Apollo landings were performed by the crew, manually commanding the lunar module (LM) attitude and rate-of-descent (ROD). In future missions, the astronauts will again need manual control of the flight path and attitude. Crew interaction mechanisms have been proposed to re-designate a landing aimpoint during the approach phase. However, manual control modes, crew control capability, and resulting vehicle performance during terminal descent have not been thoroughly investigated. A rate-control attitude hold (RCAH) mode was ultimately used in the LM for lateral flight and descent rate was controlled incrementally (P66), although other modes were considered and evaluated. These modes, as well as others proposed during Apollo, are reviewed and discussed in terms of their applicability to Altair. The ALHAT guidance, navigation, and control (GNC) algorithms for autonomous precision lunar landing were modified to include two manual flight control modes: RCAH with incremental ROD (A66) and incremental lateral velocity control with incremental ROD (A68) using Altair LDAC1-Delta vehicle parameters. Crew interactions with the ALHAT GNC system are described throughout the mission phases from lunar orbit to touchdown, focusing on manual control of flight path and attitude during terminal descent. These ALHAT manual attitude control modes are described and vehicle performance is discussed in terms of its estimated impact on handling quality ratings.

[1]  P. L. Chenoweth,et al.  Handling Qualities and Trajectory Requirements for Terminal Lunar Landing, as Determined from Analog Simulation , 1963 .

[2]  F. Bennett.  Apollo experience report: Mission planning for lunar module descent and ascent , 1972 .

[3]  T. Brady,et al.  Human Interactive Landing Point Redesignation for Lunar Landing , 2008, 2008 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[4]  R R Gilruth.  Requirements for Satisfactory Flying Qualities of Airplanes , 1941 .

[5]  Robert F. Stengel.  Manual attitude control of the lunar module , 1970 .

[6]  Mark L. Homer,et al.  Design of a Human-Interactive Autonomous Flight Manager (AFM) for Crewed Lunar Landing , 2007 .

[7]  Karl D. Bilimoria.  Effects of Control Power and Guidance Cues on Lunar Lander Handling Qualities , 2008 .

[8]  Ezra S. Krendel,et al.  Mathematical Models of Human Pilot Behavior , 1974 .

[9]  H. E. Smith,et al.  Lunar module pilot control considerations , 1968 .

[10]  Michael Johnson.  A Parameterized Approach to the Design of Lunar Lander Attitude Controllers , 2006 .

[11]  Dr. Chirold D. Epp.  The Autonomous Precision Landing and Hazard Detection and Avoidance Technology (ALHAT) , 2006 .

[12]  D. H. Shelton.  Apollo experience report: Guidance and control systems. Lunar module stabilization and control system , 1975 .

[13]  Duane T. McRuer,et al.  A Review of Quasi-Linear Pilot Models , 1967 .

[14]  George E. Cooper,et al.  The use of pilot rating in the evaluation of aircraft handling qualities , 1969 .

[15]  Allan R. Klumpp,et al.  Apollo lunar descent guidance , 1974, Autom..

[16]  C. H. Woodling,et al.  Apollo experience report: Simulation of manned space flight for crew training , 1973 .

[17]  C. R. Jarvis,et al.  Flight-test evaluation of an on-off rate command attitude control system of a manned lunar-landing research vehicle , 1967 .

[18]  L. R. Young.  Human control capabilities , 1973 .

[19]  C.D. Epp,et al.  Autonomous Precision Landing and Hazard Detection and Avoidance Technology (ALHAT) , 2007, 2007 IEEE Aerospace Conference.