Synthetic Aperture Radar imaging of ocean waves from an airborne platform: Focus and tracking issues

There has been a controversial issue of many years standing in airborne Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) ocean imaging which this paper addresses and resolves. Investigators have been strongly divided on the reasons for apparent improvement in wave contrast in response to processor focus adjustment. The dispute has centered on two parameters of wave dynamics: orbital velocity and phase velocity. This paper shows that both orbital velocity and phase velocity are of fundamental importance in the SAR wave imaging problem. The first affects the phase of the received signal, leads to velocity bunching, and is scaled by the ratio of sensor altitude to sensor velocity. The second affects the magnitude of the received signal, leads to translation of wave features during image formation (observed as blurring in the image), and is scaled by the ratio of wave phase velocity to sensor velocity, thus becoming significant for airborne radars. This treatment of the phase velocity parameter is new. It is shown that focus adjustment, as a side effect, shifts image position. This explains why experiments have appeared to “prove” that focus adjustment may be optimised for wave movement. The paper shows that better performance is obtained by compensating individual looks for wave movement before look summation, while using nominal perfect focus just as for static scatterers. The work is applicable to a full ocean wave spectrum and does not depend on the details of the scattering mechanism itself.

[1]  Leonard J. Porcello,et al.  Speckle reduction in synthetic-aperture radars , 1976 .

[2]  Werner Alpers,et al.  The effect of orbital motions on synthetic aperture radar imagery of ocean waves , 1979 .

[3]  Robert O. Harger,et al.  The SAR Image of Short Gravity Waves On a Long Gravity Wave , 1986 .

[4]  O. H. Shemdin,et al.  L band SAR ocean wave observations during Marsen , 1983 .

[5]  Calvin T. Swift,et al.  Synthetic aperture radar imaging of moving ocean waves , 1979 .

[6]  W. Brown Synthetic Aperture Radar , 1967, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[7]  R. Raney,et al.  SAR response to partially coherent phenomena , 1980 .

[8]  O. Shemdin,et al.  Synthetic aperture radar imaging of ocean waves during the marineland experiment , 1983 .

[9]  R. Raney Transfer Functions for Partially Coherent SAR Systems , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[10]  E. Walsh,et al.  Directional Wave Spectra Measured with the Surface Contour Radar , 1985 .

[11]  R. A. Shuchman Processing Synthetic Aperture Radar Data of Ocean Waves , 1981 .

[12]  Fuk K. Li,et al.  Doppler Parameter Estimation for Spaceborne Synthetic-Aperture Radars , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[13]  Robert O. Harger,et al.  Synthetic aperture radar systems : theory and design , 1970 .

[14]  R. Raney,et al.  Theory of synthetic aperture radar ocean imaging: A MARSEN view , 1985 .

[15]  M. Tucker The decorrelation time of microwave radar echoes from the sea surface , 1985 .

[16]  Jerry S. Zelenka,et al.  Comparison of continuous and discrete mixed-integrator processors , 1976 .

[17]  R. Raney,et al.  Wave orbital velocity, fade, and SAR response to azimuth waves , 1981, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.