Blind Analysis as a Correction for Confirmatory Bias in Physics and in Psychology

Psychologists and other social scientists have increasingly realized the extent to which their data analytic practices are vulnerable to confirmatory biases. In response to similar concerns, physicists have developed various methods of "blind data analysis," in which the analyst is unable to determine the actual substantive results of a study until the main analyses are judged to be complete. We give illustrations from particle physics and cosmology, and offer simulations to illustrate how similar methods might be adapted to common analytic situations in psychology.

[1]  Brian A. Nosek Improving My Lab, My Science With the Open Science Framework , 2014 .

[2]  Aaron Roodman,et al.  Blind Analysis in Nuclear and Particle Physics , 2005 .

[3]  Lloyd G. Humphreys,et al.  Capitalization on Chance in Rotation of Factors , 1969 .

[4]  R. Nickerson Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises , 1998 .

[5]  D. Fanelli “Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences , 2010, PloS one.

[6]  Mark R. Lepper,et al.  Considering the Opposite: A Corrective Strategy for Social Judgment , 1984 .

[7]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Assessing uncertainty in physical constants , 1986 .

[8]  H. Pashler,et al.  Puzzlingly High Correlations in fMRI Studies of Emotion, Personality, and Social Cognition 1 , 2009, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[9]  Reginald B. Adams,et al.  Investigating Variation in Replicability: A “Many Labs” Replication Project , 2014 .

[10]  Uri Simonsohn,et al.  Just Post It , 2013, Psychological science.

[11]  Kenneth F Schulz,et al.  Blinding in randomised trials: hiding who got what , 2002, The Lancet.

[12]  M. A. Faia ``Three Can Keep a Secret if Two are Dead'' (Lavigne, 1996): Weak Ties as Infiltration Routes , 2000 .

[13]  J. Armstrong,et al.  Derivation of Theory by Means of Factor Analysis or Tom Swift and His Electric Factor Analysis Machine , 2015 .

[14]  W. M. Wood-Vasey,et al.  Measurement of Ωm, ΩΛ from a Blind Analysis of Type Ia Supernovae with CMAGIC: Using Color Information to Verify the Acceleration of the Universe , 2006, astro-ph/0602411.

[15]  A. Casadevall,et al.  Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling , 2012, Psychological science.

[17]  J. Tukey The Philosophy of Multiple Comparisons , 1991 .

[18]  James L. Payne,et al.  Fishing Expedition Probability: The Statistics of Post Hoc Hypothesizing , 1974, Polity.

[19]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Motivated closing of the mind: "seizing" and "freezing". , 1996, Psychological review.

[20]  An invitation to Tetlock and Mitchell to conduct empirical research on implicit bias with friends, "adversaries," or whomever they please , 2009 .

[21]  Klaus Fiedler,et al.  The Long Way From α-Error Control to Validity Proper , 2012, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[22]  J. Klayman,et al.  Confirmation, Disconfirmation, and Informa-tion in Hypothesis Testing , 1987 .

[23]  Yoshihisa Kashima,et al.  How can you capture cultural dynamics? , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[24]  E. Fosse,et al.  Why are professors liberal? , 2012 .

[25]  H. J. Einhorn ALCHEMY IN THE BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES , 1972 .

[26]  Z. Kunda,et al.  The case for motivated reasoning. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[27]  Alan D. Martin,et al.  Review of Particle Physics , 2014, 1412.1408.

[28]  L. Cosmides The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task , 1989, Cognition.

[29]  C. Anderson,et al.  Violent crime rate studies in philosophical context: A destructive testing approach to heat and southern culture of violence effects. , 1996 .

[30]  F. Thoemmes,et al.  Continuously Cumulating Meta-Analysis and Replicability , 2014, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[31]  E. Wagenmakers A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[32]  Latanya Sweeney,et al.  k-Anonymity: A Model for Protecting Privacy , 2002, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst..

[33]  P. Wason On the Failure to Eliminate Hypotheses in a Conceptual Task , 1960 .

[34]  Susannah B. F. Paletz,et al.  Citizens' Perceptions of Ideological Bias in Research on Public Policy Controversies , 2009 .

[35]  Richard E. Redding,et al.  Likes Attract , 2012, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[36]  J. Koehler,et al.  The Coming Paradigm Shift in Forensic Identification Science , 2005, Science.

[37]  N. Kerr HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known , 1998, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[38]  P. Tetlock,et al.  Political diversity will improve social psychological science. , 2014, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[39]  Peter H. Ditto,et al.  Motivated Skepticism: Use of Differential Decision Criteria for Preferred and Nonpreferred Conclusions , 1992 .

[40]  E. Higgins Promotion and Prevention: Regulatory Focus as A Motivational Principle , 1998 .

[41]  M. Potter,et al.  Interference in Visual Recognition , 1964, Science.

[42]  M Stolberg Inventing the randomized double-blind trial: the Nuremberg salt test of 1835. , 2006, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[43]  Amy Perfors,et al.  Hypothesis generation, sparse categories, and the positive test strategy. , 2011, Psychological review.

[44]  Brad J. Sagarin,et al.  An Ethical Approach to Peeking at Data , 2014, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[45]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  An exploratory test for an excess of significant findings , 2007, Clinical trials.

[46]  H. Pashler,et al.  Editors’ Introduction to the Special Section on Replicability in Psychological Science , 2012, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[47]  Joel L. Schrag,et al.  First Impressions Matter: A Model of Confirmatory Bias , 1999 .

[48]  D. Campbell,et al.  The perpetuation of an arbitrary tradition through several generations of a laboratory microculture. , 1961, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[49]  K. Lewin,et al.  The Conflict Between Aristotelian and Galileian Modes of Thought in Contemporary Psychology , 1931 .

[50]  Philip S. Yu,et al.  Privacy-preserving data publishing: A survey of recent developments , 2010, CSUR.

[51]  J. Platt Strong Inference , 2007 .

[52]  M. Lepper,et al.  Considering the opposite: a corrective strategy for social judgment. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[53]  J. Platt Strong Inference: Certain systematic methods of scientific thinking may produce much more rapid progress than others. , 1964, Science.

[54]  Cristina Nita-Rotaru,et al.  A survey of attack and defense techniques for reputation systems , 2009, CSUR.

[55]  Martin Distel,et al.  Kita Driven Expression of Oncogenic HRAS Leads to Early Onset and Highly Penetrant Melanoma in Zebrafish , 2010, PloS one.

[56]  Saul Perlmutter,et al.  Blind analysis: Hide results to seek the truth , 2015, Nature.

[57]  Louis Lyons,et al.  Open statistical issues in Particle Physics , 2008, 0811.1663.

[58]  J. Ioannidis Why Science Is Not Necessarily Self-Correcting , 2012, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[59]  Leif D. Nelson,et al.  False-Positive Psychology , 2011, Psychological science.

[60]  N. Taleb Fooled by Randomness: The Hidden Role of Chance in Life and in the Markets , 2001 .

[61]  C. Goldin,et al.  Orchestrating Impartiality: The Impact of "Blind" Auditions on Female Musicians , 1997 .

[62]  John W. Tukey,et al.  Analyzing data: Sanctification or detective work? , 1969 .

[63]  A. Sims Tamas Pataki's (2014) “Wish-fulfillment in philosophy and psychoanalysis” , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[64]  R. MacCallum,et al.  Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: the problem of capitalization on chance. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[65]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  A disconfirmation bias in the evaluation of arguments. , 1996 .

[66]  M. Snyder When belief creates reality: The self-fulfilling impact of first impressions on social interaction , 1984 .

[67]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Conditions for intuitive expertise: a failure to disagree. , 2009, The American psychologist.

[68]  D. Kashy,et al.  Reporting and Interpreting Research in PSPB: Practices, Principles, and Pragmatics , 2009, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[69]  M. Mahoney Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system , 1977, Cognitive Therapy and Research.

[70]  P. Meehl Theory-Testing in Psychology and Physics: A Methodological Paradox , 1967, Philosophy of Science.

[71]  Larry V. Hedges,et al.  How hard is hard science, how soft is soft science? The empirical cumulativeness of research. , 1987 .

[72]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  US studies may overestimate effect sizes in softer research , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[73]  L. Ross,et al.  Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence , 1979 .

[74]  N. Kerr,et al.  Bias in judgment: Comparing individuals and groups. , 1996 .

[75]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. , 1999 .

[76]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Promoting Transparency in Social Science Research , 2014, Science.

[77]  R. MacCoun,et al.  Biases in the interpretation and use of research results. , 1998, Annual review of psychology.