Blind Analysis as a Correction for Confirmatory Bias in Physics and in Psychology
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Brian A. Nosek. Improving My Lab, My Science With the Open Science Framework , 2014 .
[2] Aaron Roodman,et al. Blind Analysis in Nuclear and Particle Physics , 2005 .
[3] Lloyd G. Humphreys,et al. Capitalization on Chance in Rotation of Factors , 1969 .
[4] R. Nickerson. Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises , 1998 .
[5] D. Fanelli. “Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences , 2010, PloS one.
[6] Mark R. Lepper,et al. Considering the Opposite: A Corrective Strategy for Social Judgment , 1984 .
[7] B. Fischhoff,et al. Assessing uncertainty in physical constants , 1986 .
[8] H. Pashler,et al. Puzzlingly High Correlations in fMRI Studies of Emotion, Personality, and Social Cognition 1 , 2009, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
[9] Reginald B. Adams,et al. Investigating Variation in Replicability: A “Many Labs” Replication Project , 2014 .
[10] Uri Simonsohn,et al. Just Post It , 2013, Psychological science.
[11] Kenneth F Schulz,et al. Blinding in randomised trials: hiding who got what , 2002, The Lancet.
[12] M. A. Faia. ``Three Can Keep a Secret if Two are Dead'' (Lavigne, 1996): Weak Ties as Infiltration Routes , 2000 .
[13] J. Armstrong,et al. Derivation of Theory by Means of Factor Analysis or Tom Swift and His Electric Factor Analysis Machine , 2015 .
[14] W. M. Wood-Vasey,et al. Measurement of Ωm, ΩΛ from a Blind Analysis of Type Ia Supernovae with CMAGIC: Using Color Information to Verify the Acceleration of the Universe , 2006, astro-ph/0602411.
[15] A. Casadevall,et al. Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[16] G. Loewenstein,et al. Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling , 2012, Psychological science.
[17] J. Tukey. The Philosophy of Multiple Comparisons , 1991 .
[18] James L. Payne,et al. Fishing Expedition Probability: The Statistics of Post Hoc Hypothesizing , 1974, Polity.
[19] A. Kruglanski,et al. Motivated closing of the mind: "seizing" and "freezing". , 1996, Psychological review.
[21] Klaus Fiedler,et al. The Long Way From α-Error Control to Validity Proper , 2012, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
[22] J. Klayman,et al. Confirmation, Disconfirmation, and Informa-tion in Hypothesis Testing , 1987 .
[23] Yoshihisa Kashima,et al. How can you capture cultural dynamics? , 2014, Front. Psychol..
[24] E. Fosse,et al. Why are professors liberal? , 2012 .
[25] H. J. Einhorn. ALCHEMY IN THE BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES , 1972 .
[26] Z. Kunda,et al. The case for motivated reasoning. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.
[27] Alan D. Martin,et al. Review of Particle Physics , 2014, 1412.1408.
[28] L. Cosmides. The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task , 1989, Cognition.
[29] C. Anderson,et al. Violent crime rate studies in philosophical context: A destructive testing approach to heat and southern culture of violence effects. , 1996 .
[30] F. Thoemmes,et al. Continuously Cumulating Meta-Analysis and Replicability , 2014, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
[31] E. Wagenmakers. A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[32] Latanya Sweeney,et al. k-Anonymity: A Model for Protecting Privacy , 2002, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst..
[33] P. Wason. On the Failure to Eliminate Hypotheses in a Conceptual Task , 1960 .
[34] Susannah B. F. Paletz,et al. Citizens' Perceptions of Ideological Bias in Research on Public Policy Controversies , 2009 .
[35] Richard E. Redding,et al. Likes Attract , 2012, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
[36] J. Koehler,et al. The Coming Paradigm Shift in Forensic Identification Science , 2005, Science.
[37] N. Kerr. HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known , 1998, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.
[38] P. Tetlock,et al. Political diversity will improve social psychological science. , 2014, The Behavioral and brain sciences.
[39] Peter H. Ditto,et al. Motivated Skepticism: Use of Differential Decision Criteria for Preferred and Nonpreferred Conclusions , 1992 .
[40] E. Higgins. Promotion and Prevention: Regulatory Focus as A Motivational Principle , 1998 .
[41] M. Potter,et al. Interference in Visual Recognition , 1964, Science.
[42] M Stolberg. Inventing the randomized double-blind trial: the Nuremberg salt test of 1835. , 2006, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.
[43] Amy Perfors,et al. Hypothesis generation, sparse categories, and the positive test strategy. , 2011, Psychological review.
[44] Brad J. Sagarin,et al. An Ethical Approach to Peeking at Data , 2014, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
[45] J. Ioannidis,et al. An exploratory test for an excess of significant findings , 2007, Clinical trials.
[46] H. Pashler,et al. Editors’ Introduction to the Special Section on Replicability in Psychological Science , 2012, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
[47] Joel L. Schrag,et al. First Impressions Matter: A Model of Confirmatory Bias , 1999 .
[48] D. Campbell,et al. The perpetuation of an arbitrary tradition through several generations of a laboratory microculture. , 1961, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.
[49] K. Lewin,et al. The Conflict Between Aristotelian and Galileian Modes of Thought in Contemporary Psychology , 1931 .
[50] Philip S. Yu,et al. Privacy-preserving data publishing: A survey of recent developments , 2010, CSUR.
[51] J. Platt. Strong Inference , 2007 .
[52] M. Lepper,et al. Considering the opposite: a corrective strategy for social judgment. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[53] J. Platt. Strong Inference: Certain systematic methods of scientific thinking may produce much more rapid progress than others. , 1964, Science.
[54] Cristina Nita-Rotaru,et al. A survey of attack and defense techniques for reputation systems , 2009, CSUR.
[55] Martin Distel,et al. Kita Driven Expression of Oncogenic HRAS Leads to Early Onset and Highly Penetrant Melanoma in Zebrafish , 2010, PloS one.
[56] Saul Perlmutter,et al. Blind analysis: Hide results to seek the truth , 2015, Nature.
[57] Louis Lyons,et al. Open statistical issues in Particle Physics , 2008, 0811.1663.
[58] J. Ioannidis. Why Science Is Not Necessarily Self-Correcting , 2012, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
[59] Leif D. Nelson,et al. False-Positive Psychology , 2011, Psychological science.
[60] N. Taleb. Fooled by Randomness: The Hidden Role of Chance in Life and in the Markets , 2001 .
[61] C. Goldin,et al. Orchestrating Impartiality: The Impact of "Blind" Auditions on Female Musicians , 1997 .
[62] John W. Tukey,et al. Analyzing data: Sanctification or detective work? , 1969 .
[63] A. Sims. Tamas Pataki's (2014) “Wish-fulfillment in philosophy and psychoanalysis” , 2014, Front. Psychol..
[64] R. MacCallum,et al. Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: the problem of capitalization on chance. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.
[65] Edward E. Smith,et al. A disconfirmation bias in the evaluation of arguments. , 1996 .
[66] M. Snyder. When belief creates reality: The self-fulfilling impact of first impressions on social interaction , 1984 .
[67] D. Kahneman,et al. Conditions for intuitive expertise: a failure to disagree. , 2009, The American psychologist.
[68] D. Kashy,et al. Reporting and Interpreting Research in PSPB: Practices, Principles, and Pragmatics , 2009, Personality & social psychology bulletin.
[69] M. Mahoney. Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system , 1977, Cognitive Therapy and Research.
[70] P. Meehl. Theory-Testing in Psychology and Physics: A Methodological Paradox , 1967, Philosophy of Science.
[71] Larry V. Hedges,et al. How hard is hard science, how soft is soft science? The empirical cumulativeness of research. , 1987 .
[72] J. Ioannidis,et al. US studies may overestimate effect sizes in softer research , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[73] L. Ross,et al. Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence , 1979 .
[74] N. Kerr,et al. Bias in judgment: Comparing individuals and groups. , 1996 .
[75] Duane T. Wegener,et al. Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. , 1999 .
[76] Brian A. Nosek,et al. Promoting Transparency in Social Science Research , 2014, Science.
[77] R. MacCoun,et al. Biases in the interpretation and use of research results. , 1998, Annual review of psychology.