A method for evaluating computer-supported collaborative learning processes

Understanding and analysing collaborative learning processes requires a fine-grained sequential analysis of the group interaction in the context of learning goals. Several researchers in the area of cooperative work take the quality of the group outcome as a success criterion. Nevertheless, recent findings are giving importance to the quality of the cooperation process itself. This paper presents a set of indicators the main objective of which is to evaluate the collaborative learning process. In this paper, our aim is to present a method, which can be used in analysing the interaction processes in a CSCL environment. We have defined an experiment to gather data from groups working on a simple task. These data are then used to build some cooperation indicators, which in turn allow us to estimate the quality of the work process.

[1]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  The case for case studies of programming problems , 1992, CACM.

[2]  Rachel Hertz-Lazarovits,et al.  Interaction in cooperative groups : the theoretical anatomy of group learning , 1992 .

[3]  Jonathan J. Cadiz,et al.  Coordination, overload and team performance: effects of team communication strategies , 1998, CSCW '98.

[4]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Coaching Web-based Collaborative Learning based on Problem Solution Differences and Participation , 2003, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[5]  Philip M. Johnson,et al.  Experiences with CLARE: a computer-supported collaborative learning environment , 1994, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[6]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. , 1996 .

[7]  Shlomo Sharan,et al.  Group Investigation Expands Cooperative Learning , 1990 .

[8]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. , 1978 .

[9]  Stephanie Jarboe,et al.  Procedures for Enhancing Group Decision Making , 1996 .

[10]  Michael B. Twidale,et al.  Redressing the balance: the advantages of informal evaluation techniques for Intelligent Learning Environments , 1993 .

[11]  Sandra Katz,et al.  The cognitive skill of coaching collaboration , 1999, CSCL.

[12]  César A. Collazos,et al.  Evaluating cooperation in group work , 2000, Proceedings Sixth International Workshop on Groupware. CRIWG 2000.

[13]  Spencer Kagan,et al.  The Structural Approach to Cooperative Learning. , 1990 .

[14]  Terrence Morrison,et al.  Actionable learning : a handbook for capacity building through case based learning , 2001 .

[15]  M. Hamm,et al.  Cooperative Learning: Critical Thinking and Collaboration Across the Curriculum. (Second Edition). , 1990 .

[16]  Annita Fjuk.  Towards and analytical framework for CSCdistanceL , 1995, CSCL.

[17]  Heinz Ulrich Hoppe,et al.  Computer supported interaction analysis of group problem solving , 1999, CSCL.

[18]  R. Slavin.  Synthesis of Research on Cooperative Learning. , 1981 .

[19]  N. Webb.  Student Interaction and Learning in Small Groups , 1982 .

[20]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  Seeing What We Build Together: Distributed Multimedia Learning Environments for Transformative Communications , 1994 .

[21]  P. Dillenbourg,et al.  NEGOTIATION SPACES IN HUMAN-COMPUTER COLLABORATIVE LEARNING , 1996 .

[22]  P. Dillenbourg,et al.  The evolution of research on collaborative learning , 1996 .

[23]  José A. Pino,et al.  A first step to formally evaluate collaborative work , 1997, GROUP.

[24]  Beatriz Barros,et al.  An Approach to Analyse Collaboration When Shared Structured Workspaces Are Used for Carrying out Group Learning Processes , 1999 .

[25]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Cooperative Learning Models for the 3 R's. , 1990 .

[26]  David W. Johnson.  Circles of learning: Cooperation in the classroom , 1986 .

[27]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Learning together and alone: Cooperation, competition, and individualization , 1975 .

[28]  Gavriel Salomon,et al.  What does the design of effective CSCL require and how do we study its effects? , 1992, SCOU.