Elements of infrastructure: Factors driving international entrepreneurship

This article focuses on “born globals” (Knight and Cavusgil 1996) and interfirm resources to explain international entrepreneurship. The theory posed here challenges the traditional image of international business as a long, gradual process not occurring until later in the life cycle, and applying only to large multinational corporations (MNCs). Increasingly, new ventures must expand their operations internationally early in their history in order to be competitive (Oviatt and McDougall 1994), and require infrastructure (Van de Ven 1993), or interfirm resources, for success. Specifically, firms may rely on three factors to expand internationally: cost factors, unique global resources, and networks.

[1]  R. McNaughton,et al.  Towards an Integrative Model of Small Firm Internationalisation , 2003 .

[2]  J. Spencer,et al.  Global gatekeeping, representation, and network structure: a longitudinal analysis of regional and global knowledge-diffusion networks , 2003 .

[3]  R. W. Wright,et al.  Changing Paradigms of International Entrepreneurship Strategy , 2003 .

[4]  Jerome A. Katz,et al.  Virtual Instant Global Entrepreneurship , 2003 .

[5]  Stephen Young,et al.  International Entrepreneurship Research: What Scope for International Business Theories? , 2003 .

[6]  P. Adler,et al.  Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept , 2002 .

[7]  M. Hitt,et al.  International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. , 2000 .

[8]  E. Autio,et al.  Effects of Age at Entry, Knowledge Intensity, and Imitability on International Growth , 2000 .

[9]  P. P. McDougall,et al.  International Entrepreneurship: The Intersection of Two Research Paths , 2000 .

[10]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Product Sequencing: Co-Evolution of Knowledge, Capabilities and Products , 2000 .

[11]  G. Miles,et al.  Explaining the international intensity and global diversity of early-stage technology-based firms , 1999 .

[12]  Masaaki Kotabe,et al.  Efficiency vs. effectiveness orientation of global sourcing strategy: A comparison of U.S. and Japanese multinational companies , 1998 .

[13]  Stewart R. Miller,et al.  Patterns in the Expansion of U.S. Banks' Foreign Operations , 1998 .

[14]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Competing on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos , 1998 .

[15]  Eric D. Beinhocker Strategy at the edge of chaos , 1997 .

[16]  W. Arthur,et al.  Increasing returns and the new world of business. , 1996, Harvard business review.

[17]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Resource-based View of Strategic Alliance Formation: Strategic and Social Effects in Entrepreneurial Firms , 1996 .

[18]  R. Garud,et al.  Technological and Organizational Designs for Realizing Economies of Substitution , 1997 .

[19]  J. Dunning Reappraising the Eclectic Paradigm in an Age of Alliance Capitalism , 1995 .

[20]  Mark W. Hordes,et al.  A primer for global start-ups , 1995 .

[21]  Michael A. Hitt,et al.  Understanding strategic intent in the global marketplace , 1995 .

[22]  Sea Jin Chang,et al.  International Expansion Strategy of Japanese Firms: Capability Building through Sequential Entry , 1995 .

[23]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Disruptive Technologies: Catching the Wave , 1995 .

[24]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Organizational Niches and the Dynamics of Organizational Founding , 1994 .

[25]  S. Shane,et al.  Explaining the Formation of International New Ventures: The Limits of Theories from International Business Research , 1994 .

[26]  P. P. McDougall,et al.  Toward a theory of international new ventures , 1994 .

[27]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Fools Rush in? The Institutional Context of Industry Creation , 1994 .

[28]  Paul M. Swamidass,et al.  Import Sourcing Dynamics: An Integrative Perspective , 1993 .

[29]  H. V. D. Ven The development of an infrastructure for entrepreneurship , 1993 .

[30]  D. Teece Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[31]  Andrea Bonaccorsi,et al.  On the Relationship Between Firm Size and Export Intensity , 1992 .

[32]  J. Jeannet,et al.  Challenging the incumbents: How high technology start‐ups compete globally , 1992 .

[33]  P. Gugler Building transnational alliances to create competitive advantage , 1992 .

[34]  Sumantra Ghoshal,et al.  Global strategic management: Impact on the new frontiers of strategy research , 1991 .

[35]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  The Organizational Ecology of a Technological System. , 1990 .

[36]  Shoshana Zuboff,et al.  Of Mice and Managers@@@In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power , 1992 .

[37]  J. Dunning The Eclectic Paradigm of International Production: A Restatement and Some Possible Extensions , 1988 .

[38]  D. Teece The Competitive challenge : strategies for industrial innovation and renewal : the Transamerica lectures in corporate strategy, School of Business, University of California, Berkely , 1987 .

[39]  S. Winter Knowledge and Competence as Strategic Assets , 1987 .

[40]  Charles J. Fombrun,et al.  The Telecommunications Community: An Institutional Overview , 1982 .

[41]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  How Global Companies Win Out , 1982 .

[42]  J. Johanson,et al.  The Internationalization Process of the Firm—A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitments , 1977 .

[43]  R. Vernon International investment and international trade in the product cycle , 1966 .

[44]  S. B. Linder,et al.  An essay on trade and transformation , 1964 .

[45]  M. V. Posner,et al.  INTERNATIONAL TRADE AND TECHNICAL CHANGE , 1961 .