An SSVEP-Based BCI with Adaptive Time-Window Length

A crucial problem for the overall performance of steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEP)-based brain computer interface (BCIs) is the right choice of the time-window length since a large window results in a higher accuracy but longer detection time, making the system impractical. This paper proposes an adaptive time window length to improve the system performance based on the subject's online performance. However, since there is no known methods of assessing the online performance in real time, it is also proposed a feedback from the user, through a speller, for the system to know whether the output is correct or not and change or maintain the time-window length accordantly. The system was implemented fully online and tested in 4 subjects. The subjects have attained an average information transfer rate (ITR) of 62.09bit/min and standard deviation of 2.13bit/min with a mean accuracy of 99.00% and standard deviation of 1.15%, which represents an improvement of about 6.50% of the ITR to the fixed time-window length system.

[1]  Xiaorong Gao,et al.  An online multi-channel SSVEP-based brain–computer interface using a canonical correlation analysis method , 2009, Journal of neural engineering.

[2]  Ivan Volosyak.  SSVEP based Bremen-BCI – boosting information transfer rates , 2011 .

[3]  Yijun Wang,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces Based on Visual Evoked Potentials , 2008, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[4]  A. Cichocki,et al.  Steady-state visually evoked potentials: Focus on essential paradigms and future perspectives , 2010, Progress in Neurobiology.

[5]  Audrey Girouard.  Adaptive brain-computer interface , 2009, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[6]  Robert J. K. Jacob,et al.  From Brain Signals to Adaptive Interfaces: Using fNIRS in HCI , 2010, Brain-Computer Interfaces.

[7]  Ronald M. Aarts,et al.  A Survey of Stimulation Methods Used in SSVEP-Based BCIs , 2010, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[8]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Control. , 2011, Communications of the ACM.

[9]  Ivan Volosyak,et al.  SSVEP-based Bremen–BCI interface—boosting information transfer rates , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[10]  Dean J Krusienski,et al.  Brain-computer interface signal processing at the Wadsworth Center: mu and sensorimotor beta rhythms. , 2006, Progress in brain research.

[11]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Towards adaptive classification for BCI , 2006, Journal of neural engineering.

[12]  Francesco Piccione,et al.  User adaptive BCIs: SSVEP and P300 based interfaces , 2003, PsychNology J..

[13]  J. Mourino,et al.  Asynchronous BCI and local neural classifiers: an overview of the adaptive brain interface project , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[14]  S. Gielen,et al.  The brain–computer interface cycle , 2009, Journal of neural engineering.

[15]  Ivan Volosyak,et al.  sBCI: Fast detection of steady-state visual evoked potentials , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[16]  G Pfurtscheller,et al.  Current trends in Graz Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) research. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.