Brand sustainability among young consumers: an AHP-TOPSIS approach

This study aims to identify the dominant brand attributes based on the survey conducted among 100 young consumers to know their perceptions toward sustainable brands, using multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques, arithmetic hierarchical process (AHP) and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS).,In total, 100 young consumers (18 to 24 age group) were asked to provide the pairwise comparisons for the 10 brands. MCDM methods were applied on triple bottom line dimensions to identify the best alternative. AHP is applied to compute weights for the brands’ attributes necessary for brand’s sustainability, further analyzed by TOPSIS method to rank Forbes’ top 10 brands as per young consumers’ intentions to buy.,Apple is the most sustainable brand perceived by young consumers followed by Google and Samsung. Being the top brand in Forbes list Apple also fulfills its responsibility toward the environment and recognizes young consumers’ perception accurately. Google is also contending with the same strategy and succeed in achieving a sustainable brand image. Samsung despite at number seven and second-highest revenues after Apple has managed excellently in building sustainable brand image.,Findings have shown that the top global brands do not show the same order as they exhibit in their top ranking (Forbes, 2019), and thus, create a research gap to be fulfilled by identifying the causes for the same. The results show that brand consistency and performance can be achieved through implementing sustainable and green practices such as acting social responsibility, high-quality green products, environment protection, etc., and transforming these into capabilities.,The study is an attempt to further validate Forbes’s top brands based on their perception among young customers. The study may help practitioners and policymakers to understand and get familiar with a new methodology to evaluate brands and also how to develop a positioning strategy for targeting young consumers. The paper will be a useful source of information for marketers to know how young consumers from developing countries perceive top brands on the basis of sustainability.,The social benefits of brand sustainability are related to improvements in the quality of environment, health and well-being. To link these, an enabling environment must be created that optimizes resource use, allocation and distribution.,The study is a unique attempt to use AHP and TOPSIS to evaluate the best – performing green brand from the perception of young customers in developing counties. Besides, the study provides brands attributes’ framework for sustainability and is significant for developing a model as per the choices of the young consumers.

[1]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Marketing Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1980 .

[2]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Methods for Multiple Attribute Decision Making , 1981 .

[3]  J. M. Hines,et al.  Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. , 1987 .

[4]  T. Saaty How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1990 .

[5]  Umberto Bertelè,et al.  Exploiting green strategies for competitive advantage , 1994 .

[6]  Folke Ölander,et al.  Understanding of consumer behaviour as a prerequisite for environmental protection , 1995 .

[7]  R. Klassen,et al.  The impact of environmental management on firm performance , 1996 .

[8]  Tasadduq A. Shervani,et al.  Market-Based Assets and Shareholder Value: A Framework for Analysis , 1998 .

[9]  S. Fournier,et al.  Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research , 1998 .

[10]  John Elkington,et al.  Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st‐century business , 1998 .

[11]  G. Azzone,et al.  Identifying effective PMSs for the deployment of “green” manufacturing strategies , 1998 .

[12]  John Elkington,et al.  ACCOUNTING FOR THE TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE , 1998 .

[13]  Wolfgang Ossadnik,et al.  AHP-based evaluation of AHP-Software , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  C. O'Brien,et al.  Sustainable production - a new paradigm for a new millennium , 1999 .

[15]  James A. Roberts,et al.  Environmental segmentation alternatives: a look at green consumer behavior in the new , 1999 .

[16]  David A. Aaker,et al.  The Brand Relationship Spectrum , 2000 .

[17]  D. Aaker,et al.  Relationship Spectrum: THE KEY TO THE BRAND ARCHITECTURE CHALLENGE , 2000 .

[18]  A. Kollmuss,et al.  Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? , 2002 .

[19]  R. Batra,et al.  How perceived brand globalness creates brand value , 2002 .

[20]  Eric W. T. Ngai,et al.  Selection of web sites for online advertising using the AHP , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[21]  G. Fryxell,et al.  The Influence of Environmental Knowledge and Values on Managerial Behaviours on Behalf of the Environment: An Empirical Examination of Managers in China , 2003 .

[22]  John M. T. Balmer,et al.  Corporate brands: what are they? What of them? , 2003 .

[23]  Andreas Eggert,et al.  Exploring the impact of relationship transparency on business relationships: A cross-sectional study among purchasing managers in Germany , 2003 .

[24]  Carmen Tanner,et al.  Promoting sustainable consumption: Determinants of green purchases by Swiss consumers , 2003 .

[25]  C. MacDonald,et al.  Getting to the Bottom of “Triple Bottom Line” , 2004, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[26]  T. B. Cornwell,et al.  Cross-Cultural Consumer/Consumption Research: Dealing with Issues Emerging from Globalization and Fragmentation , 2004 .

[27]  Charles J. Fombrun,et al.  A World of Reputation Research, Analysis and Thinking — Building Corporate Reputation Through CSR Initiatives: Evolving Standards , 2005 .

[28]  C. Fombrun,et al.  Measuring Corporate Social Responsibility , 2005 .

[29]  Jennifer Edson Escalas,et al.  Self‐Construal, Reference Groups, and Brand Meaning , 2005 .

[30]  G. O’Brien,et al.  Sustainable development: mapping different approaches , 2005 .

[31]  Wen-Hsien Tsai,et al.  An AHP approach to assessing the relative importance weights of ERP performance measures , 2006 .

[32]  Corporate Social Responsibility, Customer Satisfaction, and Market Value , 2006 .

[33]  Patrick Hartmann,et al.  Green value added , 2006 .

[34]  Xueming Luo,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility, Customer Satisfaction, and Market Value , 2006 .

[35]  C. Lei,et al.  On "Green Marketing" , 2006 .

[36]  E. Kurucz,et al.  Three Conceptions of Triple Bottom Line Business Sustainability and the Role for HRM , 2007 .

[37]  Charles J. Fombrun,et al.  List of Lists: A Compilation of International Corporate Reputation Ratings , 2007 .

[38]  Abhilash Vijayan,et al.  A review of green product databases , 2007 .

[39]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Sustainability and supply chain management – An introduction to the special issue , 2008 .

[40]  John Francis Fien,et al.  Youth Can Lead the Way to Sustainable Consumption , 2008 .

[41]  Jose M. Cruz,et al.  Multiperiod effects of corporate social responsibility on supply chain networks, transaction costs, emissions, and risk , 2008 .

[42]  Kaman Lee Opportunities for green marketing: young consumers , 2008 .

[43]  Alexander Dahlsrud How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions , 2008 .

[44]  L. V. Wassenhove,et al.  Sustainable Operations Management , 2005 .

[45]  Getting the stain out of “sustainable brands” , 2009 .

[46]  Graham Hubbard,et al.  Measuring organizational performance: beyond the triple bottom line , 2009 .

[47]  Mohamed M. Mostafa,et al.  Shades of green: A psychographic segmentation of the green consumer in Kuwait using self-organizing maps , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[48]  G. Kovács,et al.  The sustainable agenda and energy efficiency , 2010 .

[49]  A. Vaccaro,et al.  Corporate Transparency and Green Management , 2010 .

[50]  D. Osgood,et al.  Examining Trends in Adolescent Environmental Attitudes, Beliefs, and Behaviors Across Three Decades , 2010, Environment and behavior.

[51]  P. Ekins Eco-innovation for environmental sustainability: concepts, progress and policies , 2010 .

[52]  M. Hume Compassion without action: Examining the young consumers consumption and attitude to sustainable consumption , 2010 .

[53]  Yu‐Shan Chen The Drivers of Green Brand Equity: Green Brand Image, Green Satisfaction, and Green Trust , 2010 .

[54]  K. Lai,et al.  An Organizational Theoretic Review of Green Supply Chain Management Literature , 2011 .

[55]  Chingching Chang,et al.  Feeling Ambivalent About Going Green , 2011 .

[56]  Timothy F. Slaper,et al.  The Triple Bottom Line: What Is It and How Does It Work? , 2011 .

[57]  Maha Mourad,et al.  Perception of green brand in an emerging innovative market , 2012 .

[58]  Chiu-chi Angela Chang,et al.  Double Standard: The Role of Environmental Consciousness in Green Product Usage , 2012 .

[59]  Elcio M. Tachizawa,et al.  Extending sustainability to suppliers: a systematic literature review , 2012 .

[60]  Mariana Cristina Ganescu,et al.  Corporate social responsibility, a strategy to create and consolidate sustainable businesses , 2012 .

[61]  Cristina Gimenez,et al.  Sustainable operations: Their impact on the triple bottom line , 2012 .

[62]  Angshuman Sarkar,et al.  Green Branding and Eco-innovations for Evolving a Sustainable Green Marketing Strategy , 2012 .

[63]  Athanasios Krystallis,et al.  Investigating the Types of Value and Cost of Green Brands: Proposition of a Conceptual Framework , 2013 .

[64]  Mark S. Daskin,et al.  Carbon Footprint and the Management of Supply Chains: Insights From Simple Models , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[65]  Kai Hockerts A Cognitive Perspective of the Business Case for Corporate Sustainability , 2013 .

[66]  Vinay Kumar,et al.  Sustainability as corporate culture of a brand for superior performance , 2013 .

[67]  T. Erdil Strategic Brand Management based on Sustainable-oriented View: An Evaluation in Turkish Home Appliance Industry☆ , 2013 .

[68]  K. Govindan,et al.  A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a supplier based on triple bottom line approach , 2013 .

[69]  Eun Young Kim,et al.  Green marketing' functions in building corporate image in the retail setting , 2013 .

[70]  Ľubica Knošková Consumer Attitudes to Sustainability and Eco-Innovations , 2014 .

[71]  D. Schmuck,et al.  Consumers' green involvement and the persuasive effects of emotional versus functional ads , 2014 .

[72]  Ruggero Golini,et al.  The role of New Forms of Work Organization in developing sustainability strategies in operations , 2014 .

[73]  Sri Winarni,et al.  TOPSIS Method for Determining The Priority of Strategic Training Program , 2014 .

[74]  Plavini Punyatoya Linking Environmental Awareness and Perceived Brand Eco-friendliness to Brand Trust and Purchase Intention , 2014 .

[75]  R. Naidu,et al.  Green synthesized iron nanoparticles by green tea and eucalyptus leaves extracts used for removal of nitrate in aqueous solution , 2014 .

[76]  D. Waldron Green Brands: An Avenue to the Creation of Economic Value? , 2014 .

[77]  Prof Vikas Kumar,et al.  Sustainability and branding: An integrated perspective ☆ , 2014 .

[78]  Xiaojun Wang,et al.  An empirical investigation of green purchase behaviour among the young generation , 2014 .

[79]  R. Yazdanifard,et al.  The Concept of Green Marketing and Green Product Development on Consumer Buying Approach , 2014 .

[80]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Supplier selection for sustainable operations: A triple-bottom-line approach using a Bayesian framework , 2015 .

[81]  W. Kim,et al.  Coffee shop consumers' emotional attachment and loyalty to green stores: the moderating role of green consciousness. , 2015 .

[82]  N. Ali,et al.  The Impact of Green Marketing Strategy on the Firm's Performance in Malaysia , 2015 .

[83]  Thomas Foscht,et al.  Attribution of symbolic brand meaning: the interplay of consumers, brands and reference groups , 2016 .

[84]  G. Kushwaha,et al.  Green initiatives: a step towards sustainable development and firm's performance in the automobile industry , 2016 .

[85]  Nicole S. Vowles,et al.  Sustainable and non-sustainable consumer behavior in young adults , 2016 .

[86]  Klaus-Peter Wiedmann,et al.  The Sustainability Roots of Anticonsumption Lifestyles and Initial Insights Regarding Their Effects on Consumers' Well-Being , 2016 .

[87]  Fei Xue,et al.  Personal Networks as a Precursor to a Green Future: A Study of "Green" Consumer Socialization Among Young Millennials From India and China , 2016 .

[88]  R. Yadav,et al.  Young consumers' intention towards buying green products in a developing nation: Extending the theory of planned behavior , 2016 .

[89]  Mohammed Naved Khan,et al.  Green Purchasing Behaviour of Young Indian Consumers: An Exploratory Study , 2016 .

[90]  Kok Wei Khong,et al.  Integrating Behavioural and Branding Perspectives to Maximize Green Brand Equity: A Holistic Approach , 2017 .

[91]  W. Chu,et al.  Brand competitiveness: introducing the customer-based brand value (CBBV) – competitiveness chain , 2017 .

[92]  Colleen M. Harmeling,et al.  Toward a theory of customer engagement marketing , 2017 .

[93]  Qinghua Zhu,et al.  Green multi-tier supply chain management: An enabler investigation , 2017 .

[94]  Sonja M. Geiger,et al.  Measuring young consumers’ sustainable consumption behavior: development and validation of the YCSCB scale , 2017 .

[95]  Rajan Varadarajan,et al.  Doing well by doing good innovations: alleviation of social problems in emerging markets through corporate social innovations , 2017 .

[96]  R. Yadav,et al.  Determinants of Consumers' Green Purchase Behavior in a Developing Nation: Applying and Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior , 2017 .

[97]  Mohammed Naved Khan,et al.  Examining the role of consumer lifestyles on ecological behavior among young Indian consumers , 2017 .

[98]  A. Lobo,et al.  Young consumers’ green purchase behaviour in an emerging market , 2017 .

[99]  C. Leckie,et al.  The role of benefits and transparency in shaping consumers’ green perceived value, self-brand connection and brand loyalty , 2017 .

[100]  Prasenjit Chatterjee,et al.  Integrated QFD-MCDM framework for green supplier selection , 2017 .

[101]  Young Namkung,et al.  Are Consumers Willing to Pay more for Green Practices at Restaurants? , 2017 .

[102]  Zhang-peng Tian,et al.  Simplified Neutrosophic Linguistic Multi-criteria Group Decision-Making Approach to Green Product Development , 2017 .

[103]  P. Rau,et al.  The Effects of Environmental Awareness and Consumption Value on Green Makeup Product Purchase Intentions , 2018 .

[105]  P. Aggarwal,et al.  Brands as Rivals: Consumer Pursuit of Distinctiveness and the Role of Brand Anthropomorphism , 2018 .

[106]  Ugo Rigoni,et al.  Corporate Governance and Sustainability Performance: Analysis of Triple Bottom Line Performance , 2016, Journal of Business Ethics.

[107]  Apostolos Giovanis,et al.  Consumer-brand relationships and brand loyalty in technology-mediated services , 2018 .

[108]  Zillur Rahman,et al.  Consumer engagement in online brand communities: a solicitation of congruity theory , 2017, Internet Res..

[109]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Green marketing consumer-level theory review: A compendium of applied theories and further research directions , 2018 .

[110]  Shubo Liu,et al.  Based on Environmental Education to Study the Correlation between Environmental Knowledge and Environmental Value , 2018 .

[111]  Branding in 2025: A Dawn of a New Era , 2018 .

[112]  E. V. Steenburg,et al.  Me first, then the environment: young Millennials as green consumers , 2018, Young Consumers.

[113]  Taufiq Rizaldi,et al.  Comparison of Multi-Criteria Decision Support Methods (AHP, TOPSIS, SAW & PROMENTHEE) for Employee Placement , 2018 .

[114]  M. Brucks,et al.  The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility Efforts on the Moral Behavior of High Self‐Brand Overlap Consumers , 2018 .

[115]  Kuo-Chung Shang,et al.  Identifying Green Assessment Criteria for Shipping Industries , 2018, Environmental Sustainability in Asian Logistics and Supply Chains.

[116]  Yigit Kazancoglu,et al.  Integrated framework of disassembly line balancing with Green and business objectives using a mixed MCDM , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[117]  Deepakshi Jaiswal,et al.  Toward sustainable consumption: Investigating the determinants of green buying behaviour of Indian consumers , 2018 .

[118]  Gayle L. Prybutok,et al.  Do the millennials in the USA care about the fast food industry’s involvement in corporate social responsibility? , 2018, Young Consumers.

[119]  Vasiliki Balioti,et al.  Multi-Criteria Decision Making Using TOPSIS Method Under Fuzzy Environment. Application in Spillway Selection , 2018, Proceedings.

[120]  THE SUSTAINABLE BRAND EQUITY MODEL. A RETAIL STUDY MEASURING SUSTAINABLE BRAND EQUITY , 2018, Global Fashion Management Conference.

[121]  Bibhas Chandra,et al.  An application of theory of planned behavior to predict young Indian consumers' green hotel visit intention , 2018 .

[122]  Tahir Islam,et al.  Social comparison, materialism, and compulsive buying based on stimulus-response-model: a comparative study among adolescents and young adults , 2018 .

[123]  Brigitte Naderer,et al.  The Effects of Environmental Brand Attributes and Nature Imagery in Green Advertising , 2018 .

[124]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  The neuropsychology of consumer behavior and marketing , 2018 .

[125]  Chenhui Shao,et al.  Enhancing Sustainability and Energy Efficiency in Smart Factories: A Review , 2018, Sustainability.

[126]  Stefanie Robinson,et al.  The Efficacy of Green Package Cues For Mainstream versus Niche Brands , 2018, Journal of Advertising Research.

[127]  J. Sheth,et al.  Brand line extensions: creating new loyalties or internal variety-seeking? , 2018, Journal of Product & Brand Management.

[128]  A. Krystallis,et al.  Types of value and cost in consumer–green brands relationship and loyalty behaviour , 2018 .

[129]  Chung-Shan Yang,et al.  An analysis of institutional pressures, green supply chain management, and green performance in the container shipping context , 2017 .

[130]  Shashank J. Thanki,et al.  Ranking of drivers for integrated lean-green manufacturing for Indian manufacturing SMEs , 2018 .

[131]  S. Goyal,et al.  A DEMATEL based approach for investigating barriers in green supply chain management in Canadian manufacturing firms , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[132]  Ali Ziaee Bigdeli,et al.  Snakes and Ladders in Servitization: Using a Game to Capture Inhibitors and Enablers of Transformation , 2018, Research-Technology Management.

[133]  Leanne Johnstone,et al.  The sustainability‐age dilemma: A theory of (un)planned behaviour via influencers , 2018 .

[134]  J. Jayaram,et al.  A socio-technical view of performance impact of integrated quality and sustainability strategies , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[135]  Arnold Japutra,et al.  A consumer-based brand performance model for assessing brand success , 2019 .

[136]  Enes Ünal,et al.  What do consumers value more in green purchasing? Assessing the sustainability practices from demand side of business , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.