Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. I. Intersubject variability and consequences on the DPOAE-gram.

Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) are used widely in humans to assess cochlear function. The standard procedure consists of recording the 2f1-f2 DPOAE amplitude as a function of the f2 frequency, using a fixed f2/f1 ratio (DPOAE-gram), close to 1.20. DPOAE amplitude, as recorded in the DPOAE-gram, shows a wide range of values in normal-hearing subjects, which can impair the predictive value of the DPOAE-gram for hearing thresholds. This study is aimed at comparing intersubject variability in 2f1-f2 DPOAE amplitude according to three paradigms: a fixed f2/f1 ratio, such as the DPOAE-gram, a variable ratio DPOAE-gram (f2/f1 adapted to frequency) and an "optimum" DPOAE-gram, where the f2/f1 is adapted both to subject and frequency. The 2f1-f2 DPOAE amplitude has been investigated on 18 normally hearing subjects at ten different f2 frequencies (from 0.75 to 6 kHz), using an f2 fixed, f1 sweep paradigm, and allowed to define, for each frequency, the f2/f1 ratio giving the greatest 2f1-f2 DPOAE amplitude (or optimum ratio). Results showed a large intersubject variability of the optimum ratio, especially at frequencies below 1.5 kHz, and a significant decrease of the optimum ratio with frequency. The optimum DPOAE-gram was underestimated by up to 5.8 dB on average (up to 14.9 dB for an individual subject) by the fixed ratio DPOAE-gram, and by up to 3 dB on average (up to 10.6 dB for an individual subject) by the variable ratio DPOAE-gram. Intersubject variability was slightly but significantly reduced in the optimum DPOAE-gram versus the fixed-ratio DPOAE-gram. Lastly, correlations between tone-burst evoked otoacoustic emission (TBOAE) amplitudes and maximum DPOAE amplitudes were significantly greater than correlations between TBOAE amplitudes and fixed-ratio DPOAE amplitudes.

[1]  A. M. Brown,et al.  The behavior of the acoustic distortion product, 2f1-f2, from the human ear and its relation to auditory sensitivity. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  P Avan,et al.  Frequency specificity of human distortion product otoacoustic emissions. , 1993, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[3]  J. H. Steiger Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. , 1980 .

[4]  David T. Kemp,et al.  Suppressibility of the 2 f 1- f 2 stimulated acoustic emissions in gerbil and man , 1984, Hearing Research.

[5]  A. M. Brown,et al.  Suppression of human acoustic distortion product: dual origin of 2f1-f2. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  R. Lasky,et al.  Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in human newborns and adults. , 1992, Ear and hearing.

[7]  T. Janssen,et al.  Suppression tuning characteristics of the 2 f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in humans. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  R Probst,et al.  Reporting click-evoked and distortion-product otoacoustic emission results with respect to the pure-tone audiogram. , 1991, Ear and hearing.

[9]  R. Hauser,et al.  The influence of systematic primary-tone level variation L2-L1 on the acoustic distortion product emission 2f1-f2 in normal human ears. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  W Jesteadt,et al.  Otoacoustic emissions from normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects: distortion product responses. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  R. Probst,et al.  Suppression of the 2f 1−f 2 otoacoustic emission in humans , 1992, Hearing Research.

[12]  R. Lasky,et al.  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in human newborns and adults. II. Level effects. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  D. O. Kim,et al.  Distortion-product and click-evoked otoacoustic emissions of normally-hearing adults , 1992, Hearing Research.

[14]  J. H. Siegel,et al.  Sound calibration and distortion product otoacoustic emissions at high frequencies , 1994, Hearing Research.

[15]  Glen K. Martin,et al.  Distortion Product Emissions in Humans , 1990, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[16]  R. Hauser,et al.  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normal and hearing-impaired ears. , 1990, American journal of otolaryngology.

[17]  C. Abdala Distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1-f2) amplitude as a function of f2/f1 frequency ratio and primary tone level separation in human adults and neonates. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  J. Siegel,et al.  Ear‐canal standing waves and high‐frequency sound calibration using otoacoustic emission probes , 1994 .

[19]  B L Lonsbury-Martin,et al.  Acoustic distortion products in humans: systematic changes in amplitudes as a function of f2/f1 ratio. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  L. Robles,et al.  Two-tone distortion on the basilar membrane of the chinchilla cochlea. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  Rudolf Probst,et al.  Repeatability of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normally hearing humans. , 1993, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[22]  A. M. Brown,et al.  Two sources of acoustic distortion products from the human cochlea. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  L. Collet,et al.  Interrelations between transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions, spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and acoustic distortion products in normally hearing subjects , 1993, Hearing Research.

[24]  D. Kemp Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  A. M. Brown,et al.  Mechanical filtering of sound in the inner ear , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  A Moulin Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. II. Interrelations between multicomponent DPOAEs, tone-burst-evoked OAEs, and spontaneous OAEs. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  S. Neely,et al.  Click- and tone-burst-evoked otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired ears. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  M. J. McCoy,et al.  Test/retest reliability of distortion-product and transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions. , 1992, Ear and hearing.

[29]  M. J. McCoy,et al.  Clinical Testing of Distortion‐Product Otoacoustic Emissions , 1993, Ear and hearing.

[30]  M P Gorga,et al.  Latency and multiple sources of distortion product otoacoustic emissions. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  M. J. McCoy,et al.  Dependence of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions on primary levels in normal and impaired ears. I. Effects of decreasing L2 below L1. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  S. Schneeweiss,et al.  Evaluation of TEOAE and DPOAE measurements for the assessment of auditory thresholds in sensorineural hearing loss. , 1996, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[33]  M. J. McCoy,et al.  Dependence of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions on primary levels in normal and impaired ears. II. Asymmetry in L1,L2 space. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  J. Allen,et al.  A second cochlear-frequency map that correlates distortion product and neural tuning measurements. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  Mario A. Ruggero,et al.  Two-tone distortion in the basilar membrane of the cochlea , 1991, Nature.

[36]  F. Zeng,et al.  Distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in human adults and neonates , 1996, Hearing Research.

[37]  Glen K. Martin,et al.  Distortion Product Emissions in Humans , 1990, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[38]  B. Lonsbury-Martin,et al.  Evidence for the influence of aging on distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[39]  D. Kemp,et al.  Relationships between DPOAE and TEOAE amplitude and phase characteristics , 1999 .

[40]  M P Gorga,et al.  Toward optimizing the clinical utility of distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[41]  M. Whitehead,et al.  Effects of ear-canal standing waves on measurements of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[42]  G. K. Martin,et al.  Acoustic distortion products in rabbit ear canal. II. Sites of origin revealed by suppression contours and pure-tone exposures , 1987, Hearing Research.

[43]  P. A. Dorn,et al.  On the existence of an age/threshold/frequency interaction in distortion product otoacoustic emissions. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.