Video Confirmation of Head Impact Sensor Data From High School Soccer Players

Background: Recent advances in technology have enabled the development of head impact sensors, which provide a unique opportunity for sports medicine researchers to study head kinematics in contact sports. Studies have suggested that video or observer confirmation of head impact sensor data is required to remove false positives. In addition, manufacturer filtering algorithms may be ineffective in identifying true positives and removing true negatives. Purpose: To (1) identify the percentage of video-confirmed events recorded by headband-mounted sensors in high school soccer through video analysis, overall and by sex; (2) compare video-confirmed events with the classification by the manufacturer filtering algorithms; and (3) quantify and compare the kinematics of true- and false-positive events. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Adolescent female and male soccer teams were instrumented with headband-mounted impact sensors (SIM-G; Triax Technologies) during games over 2 seasons of suburban high school competition. Sensor data were sequentially reduced to remove events recorded outside of game times, associated with players not on the pitch (ie, field) and players outside the field of view of the camera. With video analysis, the remaining sensor-recorded events were identified as an impact event, trivial event, or nonevent. The mechanisms of impact events were identified. The classifications of sensor-recorded events by the SIM-G algorithm were analyzed. Results: A total of 6796 sensor events were recorded during scheduled varsity game times, of which 1893 (20%) were sensor-recorded events associated with players on the pitch in the field of view of the camera during verified game times. Most video-confirmed events were impact events (n = 1316, 70%), followed by trivial events (n = 396, 21%) and nonevents (n = 181, 10%). Female athletes had a significantly higher percentage of trivial events and nonevents with a significantly lower percentage of impact events. Most impact events were head-to-ball impacts (n = 1032, 78%), followed by player contact (n = 144, 11%) and falls (n = 129, 10%) with no significant differences between male and female teams. The SIM-G algorithm correctly identified 70%, 52%, and 66% of video-confirmed impact events, trivial events, and nonevents, respectively. Conclusion: Video confirmation is critical to the processing of head impact sensor data. Percentages of video-confirmed impact events, trivial events, and nonevents vary by sex in high school soccer. Current manufacturer filtering algorithms and magnitude thresholds are ineffective at correctly classifying sensor-recorded events and should be used with caution.

[1]  Thomas W Kaminski,et al.  Reducing purposeful headers from goal kicks and punts may reduce cumulative exposure to head acceleration , 2016, Research in sports medicine.

[2]  Thomas W Kaminski,et al.  Linear Acceleration in Direct Head Contact Across Impact Type, Player Position, and Playing Scenario in Collegiate Women's Soccer Players. , 2018, Journal of athletic training.

[3]  K. Guskiewicz,et al.  A helmetless-tackling intervention in American football for decreasing head impact exposure: A randomized controlled trial. , 2019, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[4]  J. Rosene,et al.  Incidence and Force Application of Head Impacts in Men’s Lacrosse: A Pilot Study , 2019, International Journal of Athletic Therapy and Training.

[5]  Julianne D. Schmidt,et al.  A Comparison of Youth Flag and Tackle Football Head Impact Biomechanics. , 2019, Journal of neurotrauma.

[6]  J. Driban,et al.  Sex differences in head acceleration during heading while wearing soccer headgear. , 2008, Journal of athletic training.

[7]  Steven Rowson,et al.  Quantifying Head Impact Exposure in Collegiate Women's Soccer , 2017, Clinical journal of sport medicine : official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine.

[8]  William R. Bussone,et al.  Six-Degree-of-Freedom Accelerations: Linear Arrays Compared with Angular Rate Sensors in Impact Events , 2017 .

[9]  J. Crisco,et al.  Frequency and location of head impact exposures in individual collegiate football players. , 2010, Journal of athletic training.

[10]  Declan A Patton,et al.  A Review of Instrumented Equipment to Investigate Head Impacts in Sport , 2016, Applied bionics and biomechanics.

[11]  G. Myer,et al.  Video Analysis Verification of Head Impact Events Measured by Wearable Sensors , 2017, The American journal of sports medicine.

[12]  John W. Powell,et al.  Cerebral Concussion: Causes, Effects, and Risks in Sports. , 2001, Journal of athletic training.

[13]  Lloyd V. Smith,et al.  Laboratory and field evaluation of a small form factor head impact sensor in un-helmeted play , 2018 .

[14]  E. Ledet,et al.  Neck Strength Imbalance Correlates With Increased Head Acceleration in Soccer Heading , 2013, Sports health.

[15]  Calvin Kuo,et al.  Comparison of video-based and sensor-based head impact exposure , 2018, bioRxiv.