Estimation of flotation rate constant and particle-bubble interactions considering key hydrodynamic parameters and their interrelations

Abstract Particle-bubble sub-processes cannot be directly and physically obtained in froth flotation due to the complexity of the process as well as numerous and dynamic interactions of particles and bubbles in an extremely intensive turbulent condition. Therefore, over the last three decades, two fundamental model configurations have been used as an only solution for prediction of particle-bubble collection efficiencies (Ecoll). Additionally, the relative intensity of the main flotation parameters on flotation rate constant, particle–bubble interactions together with their interrelations is not adequately addressed in the literature. The present study attempts in two separate phases to overcome these difficulties. In the first stage, prediction and evaluation of particle-bubble sub-processes are critically discussed by categorizing them in two configurations. The analytical models (approach I) commonly applied generalized Sutherland equation ( E c G S E ), modified Dobby–Finch ( E a DF ) and modified Schulze stability ( E s SC ) models. The second approach, numerical models, utilized Yoon–Luttrell ( E c YL ), Yoon–Luttrell (intermediate) ( E a YL ) and modified Schulze stability ( E s SC ) models. In the second stage, relative intensity and interrelation of key effective hydrodynamic parameters on the probability of particle–bubble encounter (Ec) and flotation rate constant (k) are obtained and optimized by means of the response surface modeling (RSM) based on central composite design (CCD). Five key factors including particle size (1–100 µm), particle density (1.3–4.1 kg/m3), bubble size (0.05–0.10 cm) and bubble velocity (10–30 cm/s) together with turbulence dissipation rate (18–30 m2/s3) are considered in order to maximize the responses including the k and Ec. The results obtained show that the Ecoll calculated by numerical techniques (configuration (II)) is greater than that of analytical approaches (configuration (I)) due to assumptions involved in using Yoon–Luttrell collision and attachment models. It is also found that under the conditions studied, particle size and bubble velocity are the most effective factors on Ec and k, respectively. Furthermore, not only the relative significance of factors on Ec and k but also the interrelation of cell turbulence and bubble size as well as bubble velocity and turbulence are shown to be inconsistent in the literature and thus require further studies. We briefly reported the main long-standing challenges in flotation kinetic modeling and emphasized on a serious need for fulfilling lack of physical observations. Finally, the presented analyses with respect to three-zone model offer a new concept for the extension of common flotation modeling approach using analytical and numerical techniques.

[1]  B. Johnson,et al.  Effect of gas rate and impeller speed on bubble size in frother-electrolyte solutions☆ , 2016 .

[2]  Jyeshtharaj B. Joshi,et al.  Bubble Formation and Bubble Rise Velocity in Gas−Liquid Systems: A Review , 2005 .

[3]  W. Bruckard,et al.  A review of factors that affect contact angle and implications for flotation practice. , 2009, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[4]  Kai Fallenius Turbulence in flotation cells , 1987 .

[5]  M. Çelik,et al.  Effect of bubble size and velocity on collision efficiency in chalcopyrite flotation , 2016 .

[6]  James A. Finch,et al.  Role of frother on bubble production and behaviour in flotation , 2008 .

[7]  C. Harris Multiphase models of flotation machine behaviour , 1978 .

[8]  Theodore J. Heindel,et al.  On the structure of collision and detachment frequencies in flotation models , 2002 .

[9]  W. J. Trahar A rational interpretation of the role of particle size in flotation , 1981 .

[10]  Jocelyn Bouchard,et al.  On the relationship between hydrodynamic characteristics and the kinetics of flotation. Part II: Model validation , 2015 .

[11]  J. Laskowski,et al.  Effect of Frothers on Bubble Size and Foam Stability in Potash Ore Flotation Systems , 2008 .

[12]  A. Mujumdar,et al.  Froth Flotation of Mineral Particles: Mechanism , 2008 .

[14]  P.T.L. Koh,et al.  CFD model of a self-aerating flotation cell , 2007 .

[15]  D. Fornasiero,et al.  Innovations in the flotation of fine and coarse particles , 2017 .

[16]  Elaine M. Wightman,et al.  The hydrodynamics of an operating flash flotation cell , 2013 .

[17]  M. Zanin,et al.  Influence of particle size and contact angle on the flotation of chalcopyrite in a laboratory batch flotation cell , 2011 .

[18]  M. Çelik,et al.  Effect of negative inertial forces on bubble-particle collision via implementation of Schulze collision efficiency in general flotation rate constant equation , 2017 .

[19]  Mahshid Firouzi,et al.  A review on determination of particle–bubble encounter using analytical, experimental and numerical methods , 2018, Minerals Engineering.

[20]  Atul Kumar Varma,et al.  Performance Evaluation of Basic Flotation Kinetic Models Using Advanced Statistical Techniques , 2019 .

[21]  Chris Aldrich,et al.  Effect of particle size on flotation performance of complex sulphide ores , 1999 .

[22]  F. F. Aplan,et al.  Model Discrimination in the Flotation of a Porphyry Copper Ore , 1985 .

[23]  D. Reay,et al.  Removal of fine particles from water by dispersed air flotation: effects of bubble size and particle size on collection efficiency , 1973 .

[24]  H. Schulze,et al.  Hydrodynamics of Bubble-Mineral Particle Collisions , 1989 .

[25]  Seyyed Mohammad Mousavi,et al.  Process optimization and modelling of sphalerite flotation from a low-grade Zn-Pb ore using response surface methodology , 2010 .

[26]  A. Hassanzadeh,et al.  The kinetics modeling of chalcopyrite and pyrite, and the contribution of particle size and sodium metabisulfite to the flotation of copper complex ores , 2017 .

[27]  M. Zanin,et al.  Flotation behaviour of fine particles with respect to contact angle , 2012 .

[28]  Lei Pan,et al.  Development of a turbulent flotation model from first principles and its validation , 2016 .

[29]  M. Çelik,et al.  Interplay of Particle Shape and Surface Roughness to Reach Maximum Flotation Efficiencies Depending on Collector Concentration , 2016 .

[30]  J. Finch,et al.  Some gas dispersion characteristics of mechanical flotation machines , 2006 .

[31]  Jian-guo Yang,et al.  Investigation of bubble–particle attachment interaction during flotation , 2019, Minerals Engineering.

[32]  Jan D. Miller,et al.  Contact angle and bubble attachment studies in the flotation of trona and other soluble carbonate salts , 2009 .

[33]  Mohsen Karimi,et al.  A CFD-kinetic model for the flotation rate constant, Part II: Model validation , 2014 .

[34]  Hongxiang Xu,et al.  A study of bubble-particle interactions in a column flotation process , 2016 .

[35]  Ali Vazirizadeh The relationship between hydrodynamic variables and particle size distribution in flotation , 2015 .

[36]  J. Drzymała,et al.  Concentration at the Minimum Bubble Velocity (CMV) for Various Types of Flotation Frothers , 2017 .

[37]  H. Schubert,et al.  On the hydrodynamics of flotation machines , 1978 .

[38]  Azizi Asghar,et al.  Investigating the first-order flotation kinetics models for Sarcheshmeh copper sulfide ore , 2015 .

[39]  D. Tao,et al.  Role of Bubble Size in Flotation of Coarse and Fine Particles—A Review , 2005 .

[40]  A. Martı́nez-L,et al.  Study of celestite flotation efficiency using sodium dodecyl sulfonate collector: factorial experiment and statistical analysis of data , 2003 .

[41]  A. Hassanzadeh,et al.  A study on selective flotation in low and high pyritic copper sulphide ores , 2016 .

[42]  P.T.L. Koh,et al.  CFD modelling of bubble–particle collision rates and efficiencies in a flotation cell , 2003 .

[43]  P.T.L. Koh,et al.  Mixing and gas dispersion in mineral flotation cells , 2008 .

[44]  Mousumi Gharai,et al.  Modeling of Flotation Process—An Overview of Different Approaches , 2015 .

[45]  M. Çelik,et al.  A new insight to the role of bubble properties on inertial effect in particle–bubble interaction , 2017 .

[46]  Dai,et al.  Particle-Bubble Attachment in Mineral Flotation. , 1999, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[47]  Graeme J. Jameson,et al.  Investigations of bubble–particle interactions , 2003 .

[48]  J. Franzidis,et al.  Studies on impeller type, impeller speed and air flow rate in an industrial scale flotation cell. Part 4: Effect of bubble surface area flux on flotation performance☆ , 1997 .

[49]  W. Skinner,et al.  ToF-SIMS as a new method to determine the contact angle of mineral surfaces. , 2010, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[50]  K. Runge,et al.  The effect of cell hydrodynamics on flotation performance , 2016 .

[51]  Pallavika,et al.  Optimization of a Laboratory-Scale Froth Flotation Process Using Response Surface Methodology , 2005 .

[52]  Jacob H. Masliyah,et al.  Effect of clays and calcium ions on bitumen extraction from athabasca oil sands using flotation , 2000 .

[53]  A. Hassanzadeh,et al.  Effect of pyrite content of feed and configuration of locked particles on rougher flotation of copper in low and high pyritic ore types , 2017 .

[54]  A. Dashti,et al.  Optimization of the performance of the hydrodynamic parameters on the flotation performance of coarse coal particles using design expert (DX8) software , 2013 .

[55]  M. Vanthuyne,et al.  The use of flotation techniques in the remediation of heavy metal contaminated sediments and soils: an overview of controlling factors , 2003 .

[56]  Chao Ni,et al.  The difference in flotation kinetics of various size fractions of bituminous coal between rougher and cleaner flotation processes , 2016 .

[57]  K. Forssberg,et al.  Statistical interpretation of flotation kinetics for a complex sulphide ore , 1996 .

[58]  Behzad Vaziri Hassas,et al.  Estimation of flotation rate constant and collision efficiency using regression and artificial neural networks , 2018 .

[59]  Markus A. Reuter,et al.  The simulation and identification of flotation processes by use of a knowledge based model , 1992 .

[60]  B. Rezai,et al.  Investigation of bubble-particle interactions in a mechanical flotation cell, part 1: Collision frequencies and efficiencies , 2019, Minerals Engineering.

[61]  S. Dukhin,et al.  Wetting film stability and flotation kinetics. , 2002, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[62]  A. Nguyen,et al.  The effect of microhydrodynamics on bubble-particle collision interaction , 2011 .

[63]  A. Hassanzadeh A new statistical view to modeling of particle residence time distribution in full-scale overflow ball mill operating in closed-circuit , 2018 .

[64]  P. Brito-Parada,et al.  Scale-up in froth flotation: A state-of-the-art review , 2019, Separation and Purification Technology.

[65]  G. Box,et al.  On the Experimental Attainment of Optimum Conditions , 1951 .

[66]  J. Rubio,et al.  Overview of flotation as a wastewater treatment technique , 2002 .

[67]  J. Abrahamson Collision rates of small particles in a vigorously turbulent fluid , 1975 .

[68]  Graeme J. Jameson,et al.  The effect of bubble size on the rate of flotation of fine particles , 1985 .

[69]  Ahmad Hassanzadeh Measurement and modeling of residence time distribution of overflow ball mill in continuous closed circuit , 2017 .

[70]  S. Grano,et al.  Hydrodynamics and scale up in Rushton turbine flotation cells: Part 1 — Cell hydrodynamics , 2007 .

[71]  S. Shafaei,et al.  Modeling and optimization of low-grade Mn bearing ore leaching using response surface methodology and central composite rotatable design , 2012 .

[72]  R. Chi,et al.  Reactive oily bubble technology for flotation of apatite, dolomite and quartz , 2015 .

[73]  Lei Pan,et al.  A fundamental study on the role of collector in the kinetics of bubble–particle interaction , 2012 .

[74]  Hui Wang,et al.  Flotation separation of waste plastics for recycling-A review. , 2015, Waste management.

[75]  D. Fornasiero,et al.  Calculation of the flotation rate constant of chalcopyrite particles in an ore , 2003 .

[76]  Dee Bradshaw,et al.  Influence of turbulence kinetic energy on bubble size in different scale flotation cells , 2013 .

[77]  H. Schubert On the turbulence-controlled microprocesses in flotation machines , 1999 .

[78]  U. Peuker,et al.  Flotation study of fine grained carbonaceous sedimentary apatite ore – Challenges in process mineralogy and impact of hydrodynamics , 2018, Minerals Engineering.

[79]  Jing-feng He,et al.  Flotation intensification of the coal slime using a new compound collector and the interaction mechanism between the reagent and coal surface , 2018 .

[80]  B. Derjaguin,et al.  Theory of flotation of small and medium-size particles☆ , 1993 .

[81]  M. Krasowska,et al.  Influence of surface active substances on bubble motion and collision with various interfaces. , 2005, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[82]  R. Yoon,et al.  The Effect of Bubble Size on Fine Particle Flotation , 1989 .

[83]  Kari Heiskanen,et al.  Bubble size distribution in laboratory scale flotation cells , 2005 .

[84]  O. Ozdemir,et al.  A review of induction and attachment times of wetting thin films between air bubbles and particles and its relevance in the separation of particles by flotation. , 2010, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[85]  D. Fornasiero,et al.  Bubble particle heterocoagulation under turbulent conditions. , 2003, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[86]  Y. Zheng,et al.  A Study of Kinetics on Induced-Air Flotation for Oil-Water Separation , 1993 .

[87]  A. Hassanzadeh,et al.  Recovery improvement of coarse particles by stage addition of reagents in industrial copper flotation circuit , 2017 .

[88]  J. Drelich,et al.  Flotation of methylated roughened glass particles and analysis of particle - bubble energy barrier , 2015 .

[89]  Elham Doroodchi,et al.  Effect of turbulence on particle and bubble slip velocity , 2013 .

[90]  G. Jameson The effect of surface liberation and particle size on flotation rate constants , 2012 .

[91]  J. S. Hunter,et al.  Multi-Factor Experimental Designs for Exploring Response Surfaces , 1957 .

[92]  D. Fornasiero,et al.  Particle-bubble collision models--a review , 2000, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[93]  G. Evans,et al.  A review of CFD modelling studies on the flotation process , 2018, Minerals Engineering.

[94]  J. Finch,et al.  Particle size dependence in flotation derived from a fundamental model of the capture process , 1987 .

[95]  M. P. Schwarz,et al.  CFD-based modelling of bubble-particle collision efficiency with mobile bubble surface in a turbulent environment , 2009 .

[96]  John Ralston,et al.  Reducing uncertainty in mineral flotation—flotation rate constant prediction for particles in an operating plant ore , 2007 .

[97]  Artin Afacan,et al.  Dynamic Modeling and Real-Time Monitoring of Froth Flotation , 2015 .

[98]  P. Saffman,et al.  On the collision of drops in turbulent clouds , 1956, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[99]  Mooyoung Han,et al.  Micro and nanobubble technologies as a new horizon for water-treatment techniques: A review. , 2017, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[100]  P.T.L. Koh,et al.  Sequential multi-scale modelling of mineral processing operations, with application to flotation cells , 2016 .

[101]  M. Smoluchowski Versuch einer mathematischen Theorie der Koagulationskinetik kolloider Lösungen , 1918 .

[102]  S. Shafaei,et al.  Effects of nanobubble and hydrodynamic parameters on coarse quartz flotation , 2019, International Journal of Mining Science and Technology.

[103]  Mark Cross,et al.  Modeling and Simulation of Mineral Processing Systems , 2003 .

[104]  E. C. Çilek Estimation of flotation kinetic parameters by considering interactions of the operating variables , 2004 .

[105]  M. Bezerra,et al.  Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimization in analytical chemistry. , 2008, Talanta.

[106]  Anh V. Nguyen,et al.  An improved formula for terminal velocity of rigid spheres , 1997 .

[107]  P.T.L. Koh,et al.  CFD MODELLING OF BUBBLE-PARTICLE ATTACHMENTS IN FLOTATION CELLS , 2006 .

[108]  Jan D. Miller,et al.  Computational validation of the Generalized Sutherland Equation for bubble–particle encounter efficiency in flotation , 2006 .

[109]  Jiongtian Liu,et al.  Recent experimental advances for understanding bubble-particle attachment in flotation. , 2017, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[110]  Juan Yianatos,et al.  Hydrodynamic and kinetic characterization of industrial columns in rougher circuit , 2009 .

[111]  James A. Finch,et al.  Bubble size as a function of impeller speed in a self-aeration laboratory flotation cell , 2006 .

[112]  Dai,et al.  The Inertial Hydrodynamic Interaction of Particles and Rising Bubbles with Mobile Surfaces , 1998, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[113]  P.T.L. Koh,et al.  Particle shape effects in flotation. Part 1: Microscale experimental observations ☆ , 2014 .

[114]  G. E. Agar,et al.  Flotation rate measurements to optimize an operating circuit , 1998 .

[115]  Zhenghe Xu,et al.  Measurement of sliding velocity and induction time of a single micro‐bubble under an inclined collector surface , 2008 .

[116]  A. Hassanzadeh,et al.  Impact of flotation hydrodynamics on the optimization of fine-grained carbonaceous sedimentary apatite ore beneficiation , 2019, Powder Technology.

[117]  M. P. Schwarz,et al.  CDF simulation of bubble-particle collisions in mineral flotation cells , 2000 .

[118]  J. Laskowski,et al.  Effect of frothers on bubble size , 2005 .

[119]  S. Kouachi,et al.  Yoon–Luttrell collision and attachment models analysis in flotation and their application on general flotation kinetic model , 2010 .

[120]  S. Grano,et al.  Hydrodynamics and scale up in Rushton turbine flotation cells: Part 2. Flotation scale-up for laboratory and pilot cells , 2006 .

[121]  Anh V. Nguyen,et al.  Colloidal Science of Flotation , 2003 .

[122]  Markus A. Reuter,et al.  Challenges in predicting the role of water chemistry in flotation through simulation with an emphasis on the influence of electrolytes , 2018, Minerals Engineering.

[123]  H. Schulze,et al.  Probability of particle attachment on gas bubbles by sliding , 1992 .

[124]  Graeme J. Jameson,et al.  New directions in flotation machine design , 2010 .

[125]  Subrata Kumar Majumder,et al.  Flotation technique: Its mechanisms and design parameters , 2018 .

[126]  Xiangning Bu,et al.  Kinetics of flotation. Order of process, rate constant distribution and ultimate recovery , 2016 .

[127]  Ana Casali,et al.  Rate constant modelling for batch flotation, as a function of gas dispersion properties , 2005 .

[128]  Mohsen Karimi,et al.  A computational fluid dynamics model for the flotation rate constant, Part I: Model development , 2014 .

[129]  D Lelinski,et al.  Analysis of the residence time distribution in large flotation machines , 2002 .

[130]  H. Schubert,et al.  On the optimization of hydrodynamics in fine particle flotation , 2008 .

[131]  W. J. Trahar,et al.  The flotability of very fine particles — A review , 1976 .

[132]  J. Nesset Modeling the Sauter Mean Bubble Diameter in Mechanical, Forced-air Flotation Machines , 2011 .