Knowledge transfer dynamics and innovation: Behaviour, interactions and aggregated outcomes

Innovation systems theory stresses the central importance of knowledge and the transfer of knowledge between the different actors of an innovation system, yet there are no methodological tools to systematically analyse the dynamics of such relationships. In this paper, we propose a multi-disciplinary approach drawing on social psychology to integrate innovation systems and knowledge transfer theory. We focus the empirical efforts for validating this approach in the water sector. Although Water Operator Partnerships are conceptualised to share best practices via knowledge transfer, our findings based on empirical evidence indicate clear points of consensus as well as issues of conflict in the dynamics of knowledge transfer between water operators engaged in such partnerships. The results indicate qualitative differences in goals of knowledge transfer as well as sources of differences and asymmetries in motivations, pressures and capabilities in the knowledge transfer process.

[1]  J. West,et al.  Open innovation : researching a new paradigm , 2008 .

[2]  Uta Wehn de Montalvo,et al.  Mapping the Determinants of Spatial Data Sharing , 2003 .

[3]  B. Verspagen,et al.  Systems of Innovation , 2009 .

[4]  Cristina Chaminade,et al.  Handbook of Innovation Systems and Developing Countries: Building Domestic Capabilities in a Global Setting , 2011 .

[5]  U. Wehn,et al.  Data-sharing bottlenecks in transboundary integrated water resources management: a case study of the Mekong River Commission’s procedures for data sharing in the Thai context , 2014 .

[6]  C. Montalvo,et al.  What Triggers Change and Innovation , 2006 .

[7]  Daniel Z. Levin,et al.  The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[8]  César Camisón,et al.  Knowledge absorptive capacity: New insights for its conceptualization and measurement☆ , 2010 .

[9]  H. Etzkowitz.  Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations , 2002 .

[10]  Carolin Plewa,et al.  What Drives and Inhibits University‐Business Cooperation in Europe? A Comprehensive Assessment , 2016 .

[11]  Yannis Caloghirou,et al.  Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: complements or substitutes for innovative performance? , 2004 .

[12]  P. Gleick.  Water and Energy , 1994 .

[13]  Arie Rip,et al.  The post-modern research system , 1996 .

[14]  San-Pui Lam,et al.  Predicting Intentions to Conserve Water From the Theory of Planned Behavior, Perceived Moral Obligation, and Perceived Water Right1 , 1999 .

[15]  Uta Wehn,et al.  Exploring the dynamics of water innovation , 2015 .

[16]  Carlos Montalvo Corral.  Environmental Policy and Technological Innovation: Why Do Firms Adopt or Reject New Technologies? , 2002 .

[17]  F. Malerba.  Sectoral systems of innovation and production , 2002 .

[18]  H. Staats,et al.  Explaining Proenvironmental Intention and Behavior by Personal Norms and the Theory of Planned Behavior1 , 1999 .

[19]  Uta Wehn de Montalvo,et al.  Leadership in knowledge and capacity development in the water sector: a status review , 2013 .

[20]  Gabriel Szulanski.  The Process of Knowledge Transfer: A Diachronic Analysis of Stickiness , 2000 .

[21]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Inter-Organizational Knowledge Transfer: Current Themes and Future Prospects , 2008 .

[22]  K. Pavitt.  Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change : Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory : Research Policy , 1984 .

[23]  Carlos Montalvo,et al.  Ultra Low Emission Vehicle Development: A Study on the Drivers for Car Firms and the Implications for Sustainable Development Policy , 2009 .

[24]  Wenpin Tsai.  Knowledge Transfer in Intraorganizational Networks: Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance , 2001 .

[25]  B. Frey,et al.  Motivation, Knowledge Transfer, and Organizational Forms , 2000 .

[26]  Bengt-Åke Lundvall,et al.  National Systems of Innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning London: Pint , 1995 .

[27]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[28]  C. Montalvo.  Explaining and predicting the impact of regulation on innovation: towards a dynamic model , 2007 .

[29]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[30]  M. Hekkert,et al.  Functions of innovation systems as a framework to understand sustainable technological change: empirical evidence for earlier claims , 2009 .

[31]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Dressing Up Like an Organization: When Psychological Theories Can Explain Organizational Action , 1991 .

[32]  Justin J. P. Jansen,et al.  Inter- and Intra-Organizational Knowledge Transfer: A Meta-Analytic Review and Assessment of its Antecedents and Consequences , 2008 .

[33]  Uta Wehn de Montalvo,et al.  What counts as ‘results’ in capacity development partnerships between water operators? A multi-path approach toward accountability, adaptation and learning , 2013 .

[34]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[35]  M. Gilbert,et al.  Understanding the process of knowledge transfer to achieve successful technological innovation , 1996 .

[36]  U. Wehn,et al.  Data sharing in international transboundary contexts: The Vietnamese perspective on data sharing in the Lower Mekong Basin , 2016 .

[37]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[38]  Shirley Taylor,et al.  Understanding the Determinants of Consumer Composting Behavior1 , 1997 .

[39]  Cynthia K. Riemenschneider,et al.  Executive Decisions About Adoption of Information Technology in Small Business: Theory and Empirical Tests , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[40]  L. Cronbach.  Essentials of psychological testing , 1960 .

[41]  Carlos Montalvo Corral,et al.  Sustainable production and consumption systems—cooperation for change: assessing and simulating the willingness of the firm to adopt/develop cleaner technologies. The case of the In-Bond industry in northern Mexico , 2003 .

[42]  Jun Bi,et al.  Enterprises’ willingness to adopt/develop cleaner production technologies: an empirical study in Changshu, China , 2013 .

[43]  Andrew C. Inkpen.  Learning Through Joint Ventures: A Framework Of Knowledge Acquisition , 2000 .

[44]  B. Lohani,et al.  Asian Water Development Outlook 2013: Measuring Water Security in Asia and the Pacific , 2013 .

[45]  D. Mowery,et al.  Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer , 1996 .

[46]  N. Dayasindhu,et al.  Embeddedness, knowledge transfer, industry clusters and global competitiveness: a case study of the Indian software industry , 2002 .

[47]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[48]  P. Kline.  The New Psychometrics: Science, Psychology and Measurement , 1998 .

[49]  Shulin Gu.  China's National Innovation System Approach to Participating in Information Technology: The Innovative Recombination of Technological Capability , 1997 .

[50]  Mohammad Gharesifard,et al.  To share or not to share: Drivers and barriers for sharing data via online amateur weather networks , 2016 .

[51]  R. Mansell,et al.  Knowledge Societies: Information Technology for Sustainable Development , 1998 .

[52]  J. Bargh,et al.  The psychology of action : linking cognition and motivation to behavior , 1999 .