The Market for Technology

[1]  G. Stigler.  The Division of Labor is Limited by the Extent of the Market , 1951, Journal of Political Economy.

[2]  K. Arrow.  Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention , 1962 .

[3]  Steven Cheung.  Private Property Rights and Sharecropping , 1968, Journal of Political Economy.

[4]  George A. Akerlof.  The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism , 1970 .

[5]  D. Ford,et al.  Taking technology to market , 1981 .

[6]  D. Mowery.  The relationship between intrafirm and contractual forms of industrial research in American manufacturing, 1900-1940 , 1983 .

[7]  N. Gallini.  Deterrence by Market Sharing: A Strategic Incentive for Licensing , 1984 .

[8]  D. Mowery.  Firm Structure, Government Policy, and the Organization of Industrial Research: Great Britain and the United States, 1900–1950 , 1984, Business History Review.

[9]  O. Williamson.  The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting , 1985 .

[10]  C. Shapiro,et al.  How to License Intangible Property , 1986 .

[11]  Y. Tauman,et al.  Fees Versus Royalties and the Private Value of a Patent , 1986 .

[12]  Andrea Shepard.  Licensing to Enhance Demand for New Technologies , 1987 .

[13]  S. Winter.  Knowledge and Competence as Strategic Assets , 1987 .

[14]  E. Hippel.  Cooperation between Rivals: Informal Know-How Trading , 1987 .

[15]  M. Lieberman.  Patents, learning by doing, and market structure in the chemical processing industries , 1987 .

[16]  M. Lieberman.  The learning curve, technology barriers to entry, and competitive survival in the chemical processing industries , 1989 .

[17]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[18]  R. Nelson,et al.  On the Complex Economics of Patent Scope , 1990 .

[19]  K. Rockett.  Choosing the Competition and Patent Licensing , 1990 .

[20]  A. Arora,et al.  COMPLEMENTARITY AND EXTERNAL LINKAGES: THE STRATEGIES OF THE LARGE FIRMS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY* , 1990 .

[21]  Brian D. Wright,et al.  Technology Transfer under Asymmetric Information , 1990 .

[22]  N. Rosenberg.  Why do firms do basic research (with their own money) , 1990 .

[23]  G. Pisano.  The R&D Boundaries of the Firm: An Empirical Analysis , 1990 .

[24]  S. Scotchmer,et al.  Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Cumulative Research and the Patent Law , 1991 .

[25]  M. Kamien.  Chapter 11 Patent licensing , 1992 .

[26]  A. Beggs.  The licensing of patents under asymmetric information , 1992 .

[27]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  The Anatomy of Industry R&D Intensity Distributions , 1992 .

[28]  J. Tirole,et al.  The Management of Innovation , 1994 .

[29]  J. Hagedoorn.  Inter-firm R&D partnerships: an overview of major trends and patterns since 1960 , 2002 .

[30]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[31]  P. David,et al.  Toward a new economics of science , 1994 .

[32]  A. Arora,et al.  The changing technology of technological change: general and abstract knowledge and the division of , 1994 .

[33]  James J. Anton,et al.  Expropriation and Inventions: Appropriable Rents in the Absence of Property Rights , 1994 .

[34]  A. Arora,et al.  Evaluating technological information and utilizing it: Scientific knowledge, technological capability, and external linkages in biotechnology , 1994 .

[35]  A. Arora.  Licensing Tacit Knowledge: Intellectual Property Rights And The Market For Know-How , 1995 .

[36]  G. Winder.  Before the Corporation and Mass Production: The Licensing Regime in the Manufacture of North American Harvesting Machinery, 1830–1910 , 1995 .

[37]  Inés Macho-Stadler,et al.  The Role of Information in Licensing Contract Design , 1996 .

[38]  Svein Ulset.  R&D outsourcing and contractual governance: An empirical study of commercial R&D projects , 1996 .

[39]  R. Zeckhauser.  The challenge of contracting for technological information. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  S. Klepper.  Entry, Exit, Growth, and Innovation over the Product Life Cycle , 1996 .

[41]  A. Arora.  Contracting for tacit knowledge: the provision of technical services in technology licensing contracts , 1996 .

[42]  Kenneth L. Sokoloff,et al.  Long-term change in the organization of inventive activity. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  T. Bresnahan,et al.  The Division of Inventive Labor and The Extent of The Market , 1997 .

[44]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Antitrust Issues in the Licensing of Intellectual Property: The Nine No-No's Meet the Nineties , 1997 .

[45]  Kenneth L. Sokoloff,et al.  Inventors, Firms, and the Market for Technology in the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries , 1997 .

[46]  A. Gambardella,et al.  Does technological convergence imply convergence in markets? Evidence from the electronics industry , 1998 .

[47]  J. Gans,et al.  Incumbency and R&D Incentives: Licensing the Gale of Creative Destruction , 1999 .

[48]  E. Brousseau,et al.  Technology licensing contracts features and diversity , 1998 .

[49]  M. Heller,et al.  Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research , 1998, Science.

[50]  Samuel Kortum,et al.  What is behind the recent surge in patenting , 1999 .

[51]  Carl Shapiro,et al.  Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard Setting , 2000, Innovation Policy and the Economy.

[52]  Focused Firms and the Incentive to Innovate , 2000 .

[53]  David H. Hsu,et al.  When Does Start-Up Innovation Spur the Gale of Creative Destruction? , 2000 .

[54]  Alessandro Nuvolari,et al.  Collective Invention during the British Industrial Revolution The Case of the Cornish Pumping Engine , 2004 .

[55]  F. Cesaroni.  Technology Strategies in the Knowledge Economy: The Licensing Activity of Himont , 2003 .

[56]  K. Pavitt,et al.  Knowledge Specialization, Organizational Coupling, and the Boundaries of the Firm: Why Do Firms Know More than They Make? , 2001 .

[57]  Kenneth L. Sokoloff,et al.  Market Trade in Patents and the Rise of a Class of Specialized Inventors in the 19th-Century United States , 2001 .

[58]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Proofs and Prototypes for Sale: The Licensing of University Inventions , 2001 .

[59]  A. Arora,et al.  Specialized technology suppliers, international spillovers and investment: evidence from the chemical industry , 2001 .

[60]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980 , 2001 .

[61]  Pamela J. D. Smith.  How do foreign patent rights affect U.S. exports, affiliate sales, and licenses? , 2001 .

[62]  K. Maskus,et al.  Intellectual property rights and licensing: An econometric investigation , 2001 .

[63]  Rosemarie H. Ziedonis,et al.  The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the U , 2001 .

[64]  James J. Anton,et al.  The Sale of Ideas: Strategic Disclosure, Property Rights, and Contracting , 2002 .

[65]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  R&D spillovers, patents and the incentives to innovate in Japan and the United States , 2002 .

[66]  R. Veugelers,et al.  R&D Cooperation and Spillovers: Some Empirical Evidence , 1998 .

[67]  Jerry G. Thursby,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Who Is Selling the Ivory Tower? Sources of Growth in University Licensing , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[68]  A. Arora,et al.  Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy , 2002 .

[69]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  Working Through the Patent Problem , 2003, Science.

[70]  T. Khanna,et al.  The Structure of Licensing Contracts , 2003 .

[71]  Marco S. Giarratana.  The birth of a new industry: entry by start-ups and the drivers of firm growth: The case of encryption software , 2004 .

[72]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[73]  Matthew J. Higgins,et al.  The outsourcing of R&D through acquisitions in the pharmaceutical industry , 2006 .

[74]  R. Merges,et al.  The Control of Technology Alliances: An Empirical Analysis of the Biotechnology Industry , 2003 .

[75]  A. Arora,et al.  Licensing the market for technology , 2003 .

[76]  K. Maskus,et al.  Transfer of Technology to Developing Countries: Unilateral and Multilateral Policy Options , 2004 .

[77]  Andrea Fosfuri.  Determinants of international activity: evidence from the chemical processing industry , 2004 .

[78]  Lee G. Branstetter,et al.  Do Stronger Intellectual Property Rights Increase International Technology Transfer? Empirical Evidence from U.S. Firm-Level Panel Data , 2004 .

[79]  Kenneth L. Sokoloff,et al.  Institutions and Democratic Invention in 19th-Century America: Evidence from "Great Inventors," 1790-1930 , 2004 .

[80]  R. Merges,et al.  Specialized supply firms, property rights and firm boundaries , 2004 .

[81]  M. Dowling,et al.  Licensing as a commercialisation strategy for new technology-based firms , 2004 .

[82]  Kenneth L. Sokoloff,et al.  The Decline of the Independent Inventor: A Schumpterian Story? , 2005 .

[83]  J. Cantwell,et al.  Creating Competition? Globalisation and the Emergence of New Technology Producers , 2005 .

[84]  E. Garnsey,et al.  Commercializing Generic Technology: The Case of Advanced Materials Ventures , 2005 .

[85]  Alfonso Gambardella,et al.  Proprietary vs. Public Domain Licensing of Software and Research Products , 2005 .

[86]  Ilan Guedj.  Ownership vs. Contract: How Vertical Integration Affects Investment Decisions in Pharmaceutical R&D , 2005 .

[87]  P. Danzon,et al.  Productivity in Pharmaceutical Biotechnology R&D: The Role of Experience and Alliances , 2003, Journal of health economics.

[88]  Sadao Nagaoka.  Determinants of high-royalty contracts and the impact of stronger protection of intellectual property rights in Japan , 2005 .

[89]  William B. Vogt,et al.  Is the Division of Labor Limited by the Extent of the Market?: Evidence from Chemical Industry , 2009 .

[90]  Andrea Fosfuri.  The Licensing Dilemma: Understanding the Determinants of the Rate of Technology Licensing , 2006 .

[91]  Mark A. Lemley,et al.  Patent Holdup and Royalty Stacking , 2006 .

[92]  A. McGahan,et al.  Profiting from Technological Innovation: The Effect of Competitor Patenting on Firm Value , 2006 .

[93]  S. Winter,et al.  Vertical Integration and Dis-integration of Computer Firms: A History Friendly Model of the Co-evolution of the Computer and Semiconductor Industries , 2008 .

[94]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[95]  A. McGahan,et al.  Profiting from technological innovation by others: The effect of competitor patenting on firm value , 2006 .

[96]  Ashish Arora,et al.  Patent Protection, Complementary Assets, and Firms' Incentives for Technology Licensing , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[97]  E. Brousseau,et al.  The Governance of Contracts: Empirical Evidence on Technology Licensing Agreements , 2006 .

[98]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  Where excludability matters: Material versus intellectual property in academic biomedical research , 2007 .

[99]  P. Mendi.  Trade in disembodied technology and total factor productivity in OECD countries , 2007 .

[100]  A. Arora,et al.  Chapter 4 Patents and the Market for Technology , 2007 .

[101]  G. Thoma.  Striving for a Large Market: Evidence from a General Purpose Technology in Action , 2008 .

[102]  A. Roth.  What Have We Learned from Market Design? , 2008 .

[103]  Avi Goldfarb,et al.  Understanding the Inputs into Innovation: Do Cities Substitute for Internal Firm Resources? , 2007, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[104]  Andrea Fosfuri,et al.  The Penguin Has Entered the Building: The Commercialization of Open Source Software Products , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[105]  E. Brousseau,et al.  Payment Schemes in Technology Licensing Agreements: A Transaction Cost Approach , 2008 .

[106]  K. Motohashi.  Licensing or not licensing? An empirical analysis of the strategic use of patents by Japanese firms , 2008 .

[107]  R. Caves,et al.  THE IMPERFECT MARKET FOR TECHNOLOGY LICENSES , 2009 .

[108]  Ashish Arora,et al.  A Breath of Fresh Air? Firm Type, Scale, Scope, and Selection Effects in Drug Development , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[109]  Institutional Change and Income Distribution in the Chinese Countryside , 2009 .

[110]  F. Lissoni,et al.  University Research and Public–Private Interaction , 2010 .