Entry Deterrence in the Ready-to-Eat Breakfast Cereal Industry

This paper presents an analysis of the ready-to-eat breakfast cereal industry based on and related to the current antitrust case involving its leading producers. A spatial competition comparison framework is employed, with brands assumed relatively immobile. It is argued that the industry's conduct, in which price competition is avoided and rivalry focuses on new brand introductions, tends to deter entry and protect profits. Entry into a new segment of the market in the 1970s is discussed. Relevant welfare-theoretic issues are analyzed, and it is argued that the remedy proposed by the FTC is likely to improve performance.

[1]  H. Hotelling.  Stability in Competition , 1929 .

[2]  H. Singer,et al.  Some Notes on Duopoly and Spatial Competition , 1937, Journal of Political Economy.

[3]  M. A. Copeland.  Competing Products and Monopolistic Competition , 1940 .

[4]  A. Smithies.  Optimum Location in Spatial Competition , 1941, Journal of Political Economy.

[5]  Edward H. Chamberlin.  The Product as an Economic Variable , 1953 .

[6]  L. E. Fouraker,et al.  The Theory of Monopolistic Competition , 1933 .

[7]  E. Chamberlin,et al.  Towards a More General Theory of Value. , 1958 .

[8]  G. Tullock.  OPTIMALITY WITH MONOPOLISTIC COMPETITION , 1965 .

[9]  K. Lancaster.  A New Approach to Consumer Theory , 1966, Journal of Political Economy.

[10]  Paul A. Samuelson.  The Monopolistic Competition Revolution , 1967 .

[11]  William J. Baumol,et al.  Calculation of Optimal Product and Retailer Characteristics: The Abstract Product Approach , 1967, Journal of Political Economy.

[12]  L. Telser.  On the Regulation of Industry: A Note , 1969, Journal of Political Economy.

[13]  M. Lovell.  PRODUCT DIFFERENTIATION AND MARKET STRUCTURE , 1970 .

[14]  F. Scherer,et al.  Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. , 1971 .

[15]  B. Yamey.  Predatory Price Cutting: Notes and Comments , 1972, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[16]  The optimal size of market areas , 1972 .

[17]  Y. Peles.  A Note on Equilibrium in Monopolistic Competition , 1974, Journal of Political Economy.

[18]  G. Archibald,et al.  The “New” Theory of Consumer Demand and Monopolistic Competition , 1975 .

[19]  A. Dixit,et al.  Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity , 1977 .

[20]  A. Spence.  Monopoly, Quality, and Regulation , 1975 .

[21]  R. Lipsey,et al.  The Principle of Minimum Differentiation Reconsidered: Some New Developments in the Theory of Spatial Competition , 1975 .

[22]  R. Rothschild.  A NOTE ON THE EFFECT OF SEQUENTIAL ENTRY ON CHOICE OF LOCATION , 1976 .

[23]  B. Eaton,et al.  FREE ENTRY IN ONE‐DIMENSIONAL MODELS: PURE PROFITS AND MULTIPLE EQUILIBRIA* , 1976 .

[24]  Donald Hay,et al.  Sequential Entry and Entry-Deterring Strategies in Spatial Competition , 1976 .

[25]  E. Prescott,et al.  Sequential location among firms with foresight , 1977 .

[26]  M. Porter,et al.  From Entry Barriers to Mobility Barriers: Conjectural Decisions and Contrived Deterrence to New Competition , 1977 .

[27]  R. Willig.  Welfare analysis of policies affecting prices and products , 1979 .