CT temporal subtraction: techniques and clinical applications.

Quant Imaging Med Surg 2021;11(6):2214-2223 | http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-20-1367 Computed tomography (CT) has been the main noninvasive diagnostic technique for evaluating lung lesions. Although multidetector CT (MDCT) enables simultaneous increased z-axis coverage and thinner slice collimation, large numbers of axial images are generated by MDCT, which leads to reviewer fatigue during interpretation (1). Human perceptual errors, therefore, currently seem to be one of the most significant limiting factors in the detection of small lung lesions (2). Bone is one of the most common sites for metastasis in cancer along with lung. Although CT is a routine imaging modality to survey many types of cancer, bone metastases are often missed at CT because of their subtle findings. Other modalities, such as bone scintigraphy and positron emission tomography (PET), are useful to detect bone metastasis, but they still must be identified at CT anatomically. In order to solve these problems, computer aided diagnosis (CAD) systems have attracted attention in recent years (3). Improvement of image interpretation speed and image analysis accuracy is expected by using the CAD system because it can reduce burden on interpreting physicians and reduce variation in diagnostic accuracy. Temporal subtraction (TS), which is one of the computeraided detection (CADe) techniques, can remove most of the normal structures, such as blood vessels, ribs, muscles, by performing subtraction calculation processing between the current and the previous images of the same subject (4). CTTS technique can enhance the subtle change between the CT images. Therefore, it has been developed for CADe of small or ground-glass lung nodules and small or faint bone metastases. In available CT-CAD system lesion candidates are usually indicated by symbol/mark on a computeroutput image, however, in the TS system observers refer to the subtraction image without symbol/mark and then judge whether a “lesion” exist or not. Therefore, diagnostic performance is heavily affected by the image quality of the subtraction image. To obtain a high-quality subtraction image without subtraction artifacts, image registration is a key technology. Up to date, there are many rigid and nonrigid image registration techniques. If the image warping is incorrect, normal structures remain as the artifacts on the subtraction image, and as a result the image quality can be degraded. Many image warping techniques have been developed based on 2-dimensional (2D) images using a chest radiography (5-7), and TS on plain radiograph have already been commercially available. In general, CT images which is obtained different time series have temporal changes such as shape, size and location. A TS image on thoracic CT, which is obtained by subtraction of a previous image from a current one, has a 3-dimensional (3D) structure and the deformation of the subject in the axial direction needs to be considered 3D registration technique is necessary. Since early 2000, several attempts have been made to develop an image warping technique based on 3D images using thoracic MDCT images (8,9). Although the quality of the subtraction images based on 3D was relatively good in general, misregistration still appeared as artifacts on the subtraction images. It is, however, necessary to employ a more complex 3D registration, since the TS image obtained from two successive CT scans can have noticeable Editorial

[1]  M. Giger,et al.  Digital image subtraction of temporally sequential chest images for detection of interval change. , 1994, Medical physics.

[2]  H MacMahon,et al.  Improvement in detection of pulmonary nodules: digital image processing and computer-aided diagnosis. , 2000, Radiographics.

[3]  Hany Farid,et al.  Elastic registration in the presence of intensity variations , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  T. Masumoto,et al.  Clinical usefulness of temporal subtraction CT in detecting vertebral bone metastases. , 2019, European journal of radiology.

[6]  Junji Shiraishi,et al.  Temporal subtraction method for lung nodule detection on successive thoracic CT soft-copy images. , 2014, Radiology.

[7]  Andrew P. Witkin,et al.  Uniqueness of the Gaussian Kernel for Scale-Space Filtering , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[8]  Kunio Doi,et al.  Application of temporal subtraction for detection of interval changes on chest radiographs: Improvement of subtraction images using automated initial image matching , 1999, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[9]  Yuanzhong Li,et al.  Thoracic Temporal Subtraction Three Dimensional Computed Tomography (3D-CT): Screening for Vertebral Metastases of Primary Lung Cancers , 2017, PloS one.

[10]  Qiang Li,et al.  High performance lung nodule detection schemes in CT using local and global information. , 2012, Medical physics.

[11]  Temporal subtraction of computed tomography images improves detectability of bone metastases by radiology residents , 2019, European Radiology.

[12]  Lubomir M. Hadjiiski,et al.  Effect of CAD on radiologists' detection of lung nodules on thoracic CT scans: analysis of an observer performance study by nodule size. , 2009, Academic radiology.

[13]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Comparison of edge-based and ridge-based registration of CT and MR brain images , 1996, Medical Image Anal..

[14]  V.R.S Mani,et al.  Survey of Medical Image Registration , 2013 .

[15]  Susumu Mori,et al.  Temporal Subtraction of Serial CT Images with Large Deformation Diffeomorphic Metric Mapping in the Identification of Bone Metastases. , 2017, Radiology.

[16]  Mitko Veta,et al.  Deformable image registration using convolutional neural networks , 2018, Medical Imaging.

[17]  H Nakata,et al.  ROC analysis of detection of metastatic pulmonary nodules on digital chest radiographs with temporal subtraction. , 2001, Academic radiology.

[18]  Dinggang Shen,et al.  Scalable High-Performance Image Registration Framework by Unsupervised Deep Feature Representations Learning , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  Huimin Lu,et al.  Automatic classification of lung nodules on MDCT images with the temporal subtraction technique , 2017, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[20]  Hyoungseop Kim,et al.  CT temporal subtraction method for detection of sclerotic bone metastasis in the thoracolumbar spine. , 2018, European journal of radiology.

[21]  T. Hirose,et al.  Evaluation of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) software for the detection of lung nodules on multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT): JAFROC study for the improvement in radiologists' diagnostic accuracy. , 2008, Academic radiology.

[22]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  Large Deformation Diffeomorphic Metric Curve Mapping , 2008, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[23]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  Time sequence diffeomorphic metric mapping and parallel transport track time-dependent shape changes , 2009, NeuroImage.

[24]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[25]  Michael Unser,et al.  Fast B-spline Transforms for Continuous Image Representation and Interpolation , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[26]  M. Viergever,et al.  Medical image matching-a review with classification , 1993, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[27]  Margrit Betke,et al.  Chest CT: automated nodule detection and assessment of change over time--preliminary experience. , 2001, Radiology.

[28]  Vladimir Kolmogorov,et al.  An experimental comparison of min-cut/max- flow algorithms for energy minimization in vision , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[29]  CT temporal subtraction improves early detection of bone metastases compared to SPECT , 2019, European Radiology.

[30]  K Doi,et al.  Digital chest radiography: effect of temporal subtraction images on detection accuracy. , 1997, Radiology.

[31]  K. Doi,et al.  Computerized detection of lung nodules in thin-section CT images by use of selective enhancement filters and an automated rule-based classifier. , 2008, Academic Radiology.

[32]  H Takao,et al.  Evaluation of an automated system for temporal subtraction of thin-section thoracic CT. , 2007, The British journal of radiology.

[33]  Kunio Doi,et al.  Effect of temporal subtraction images on radiologists' detection of lung cancer on CT: results of the observer performance study with use of film computed tomography images. , 2004, Academic radiology.

[34]  Xinhua Zhuang,et al.  Image Analysis Using Mathematical Morphology , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[35]  Raj Shekhar,et al.  Automatic elastic image registration by interpolation of 3D rotations and translations from discrete rigid-body transformations , 2006, Medical Image Anal..

[36]  L. Berlin,et al.  Malpractice issues in radiology. Perceptual errors. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[37]  Hyoungseop Kim,et al.  Detection of lung carcinoma with predominant ground-glass opacity on CT using temporal subtraction method , 2018, European Radiology.

[38]  Kunio Doi,et al.  Development of a Voxel-Matching Technique for Substantial Reduction of Subtraction Artifacts in Temporal Subtraction Images Obtained from Thoracic MDCT , 2010, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[39]  Dimitris N. Metaxas,et al.  Hybrid Image Registration based on Configural Matching of Scale-Invariant Salient Region Features , 2004, 2004 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop.

[40]  Sébastien Ourselin,et al.  Weakly-supervised convolutional neural networks for multimodal image registration , 2018, Medical Image Anal..