Stakeholder analysis in higher education

The issue of stakeholder identification and management is relatively well understood in the literature for private sector organisations (Christopher et al 2002, Rutterford et al 2006), and its importance is increasing across all developed countries (Maassen 2000, Wit and Verhoeven 2000, Peters 1996, Kettle 2002). However, whilst stakeholder theory has been advanced in commercial arenas (Donaldson and Preston 1995), there is less research in the public and non‐profit areas (Bryson 2004), particularly with regard to universities. Stakeholder identification and management are important disciplines in terms of effective management (Mitchell et al 1997) ‘making decisions’ and planning strategy (Bryson 2004), identifying problems to be solved (Freeman 1984), and ultimately knowing who may exert their influence over the organisation (Mitchell et al 1997). Identifying and understanding the stakeholders of relevance to an organisation, and their influence or interest, is therefore of key importance to managers and policy‐makers. The aim of this paper is to investigate this gap in the literature, namely specific understanding of stakeholders and the nature of stakeholder management for universities. In this context the study focuses on the identification and prioritisation of stakeholders for a UK university, a process that may be ‘key to the success of public sector organisations’ (Bryson 2004). Whilst stakeholder identification and classification is a familiar concept, its application to the particular context of a UK university is less explored, and this paper aims to drive more effective university stakeholder management through ‘improving management, creating public value and advancing the common good’ (Bryson 2004). The paper employs a case study approach that focuses on the University of Portsmouth, a large, modern UK university.

[1]  Peter M. Chisnall,et al.  Marketing Research , 1992 .

[2]  G. Grisetti,et al.  Further Reading , 1984, IEEE Spectrum.

[3]  Mark H. Moore,et al.  Creating Public Value , 2017 .

[4]  Nicholas J. Ashill,et al.  Mapping and assessing the key management issues influencing UK public healthcare purchaser‐provider cooperation , 2006 .

[5]  Martin Christopher,et al.  Relationship Marketing: Creating Stakeholder Value , 2002 .

[6]  A. Bryman,et al.  Business Research Methods , 2004 .

[7]  M. Reed Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review , 2008 .

[8]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[9]  J. Eastman,et al.  Insurance Sales Agents and the Internet: The Relationship Between Opinion Leadership, Subjective Knowledge, and Internet Attitudes , 2002 .

[10]  B. Guy Peters,et al.  The Future of Governing: Four Emerging Models , 1996 .

[11]  C. Oliver STRATEGIC RESPONSES TO INSTITUTIONAL PROCESSES , 1991 .

[12]  Tim Rowley Moving Beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences , 1997 .

[13]  I. Parker Facts and figures. , 1973, The Probe.

[14]  Jef Verhoeven,et al.  Stakeholders in Universities and Colleges in Flanders , 2000 .

[15]  R. Burby Making Plans that Matter: Citizen Involvement and Government Action , 2003 .

[16]  Cathy A. Enz,et al.  Graduate-level education: a survey of stakeholders. , 1993 .

[17]  Richard Whittington,et al.  Exploring Corporate Strategy , 1988 .

[18]  B. Menguc,et al.  Stakeholder Multiplicity: Toward an Understanding of the Interactions between Stakeholders , 2006 .

[19]  R. Margerum Collaborative Planning , 2002 .

[20]  P. Liamputtong Qualitative Research Methods , 2005 .

[21]  L. Preston,et al.  The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications , 1995 .

[22]  R. Freeman Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , 2010 .

[23]  R. Stake The art of case study research , 1995 .

[24]  M. Clarkson A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance , 1995 .

[25]  D. C. Sutton Making strategy: the journey of strategic management , 2001 .

[26]  Ronald K. Mitchell,et al.  Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts , 1997 .

[27]  Anil Graves,et al.  Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[28]  Donald F. Kettl,et al.  The Transformation of Governance: Public Administration for Twenty-First Century America , 2002 .

[29]  B. Jones,et al.  Agendas and instability in American politics , 1993 .

[30]  The pursuit of value through qualitative market research , 1999 .

[31]  Jan Schilling On the Pragmatics of Qualitative Assessment , 2006 .

[32]  Peter Shanahan,et al.  Quality in university student administration: stakeholder conceptions , 2004 .

[33]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[34]  P. Maassen The Changing Roles of Stakeholders in Dutch University Governance , 2000 .

[35]  Jan Schilling On the Pragmatics of Qualitative Assessment Designing the Process for Content Analysis , 2006 .

[36]  C. Eden,et al.  Making Strategy: The Journey of Strategic Management , 1998 .

[37]  Evert Gummesson,et al.  Qualitative research in marketing , 2005 .

[38]  Mari Brookes,et al.  Higher education: marketing in a quasi‐commercial service industry , 2003 .

[39]  M. Polonsky A stakeholder theory approach to designing environmental marketing strategy , 1995 .

[40]  Kenneth L. Kraft,et al.  The perceived role of ethics and social responsibility: A scale development , 1996 .

[41]  Richard D. F. Harris The Impact of the University of Portsmouth on the Local Economy , 1997 .

[42]  Sankar Sen,et al.  Withholding Consumption: A Social Dilemma Perspective on Consumer Boycotts , 2001 .

[43]  L. Gomes,et al.  Depicting the arena in which Brazilian local government authorities make decisions , 2009 .

[44]  J. Bryson What to do when Stakeholders matter , 2004 .