Reward expectation influences audiovisual spatial integration

In order to determine the spatial location of an object that is simultaneously seen and heard, the brain assigns higher weights to the sensory inputs that provide the most reliable information. For example, in the well-known ventriloquism effect, the perceived location of a sound is shifted toward the location of a concurrent but spatially misaligned visual stimulus. This perceptual illusion can be explained by the usually much higher spatial resolution of the visual system as compared to the auditory system. Recently, it has been demonstrated that this cross-modal binding process is not fully automatic, but can be modulated by emotional learning. Here we tested whether cross-modal binding is similarly affected by motivational factors, as exemplified by reward expectancy. Participants received a monetary reward for precise and accurate localization of brief auditory stimuli. Auditory stimuli were accompanied by task-irrelevant, spatially misaligned visual stimuli. Thus, the participants’ motivational goal of maximizing their reward was put in conflict with the spatial bias of auditory localization induced by the ventriloquist situation. Crucially, the amounts of expected reward differed between the two hemifields. As compared to the hemifield associated with a low reward, the ventriloquism effect was reduced in the high-reward hemifield. This finding suggests that reward expectations modulate cross-modal binding processes, possibly mediated via cognitive control mechanisms. The motivational significance of the stimulus material, thus, constitutes an important factor that needs to be considered in the study of top-down influences on multisensory integration.

[1]  L. Chelazzi,et al.  Visual Selective Attention and the Effects of Monetary Rewards , 2006, Psychological science.

[2]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis, 4th ed. , 2005 .

[3]  F. Windels,et al.  Neuronal activity , 2006, Molecular Neurobiology.

[4]  M. Mon-Williams,et al.  Motor Control and Learning , 2006 .

[5]  Luiz Pessoa,et al.  Reward Reduces Conflict by Enhancing Attentional Control and Biasing Visual Cortical Processing , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  Fabrizio Leo,et al.  Cross-modal localization in hemianopia: new insights on multisensory integration. , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[7]  P. Deltenre,et al.  Electrophysiology of spatial scene analysis: the mismatch negativity (MMN) is sensitive to the ventriloquism illusion , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[8]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Comprar Motor control and learning. A behavioral emphasis | Richard A. Schmidt | 9780736079617 | Human Kinetics , 2011 .

[9]  Yuka Sasaki,et al.  Greater Disruption Due to Failure of Inhibitory Control on an Ambiguous Distractor , 2006, Science.

[10]  L. Pessoa,et al.  Combined Effects of Attention and Motivation on Visual Task Performance: Transient and Sustained Motivational Effects , 2008, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[11]  Nelson A. M. Lemos,et al.  Neuronal Activity in the Primary Somatosensory Thalamocortical Loop Is Modulated by Reward Contingency during Tactile Discrimination , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  P. Bertelson,et al.  The ventriloquist effect does not depend on the direction of deliberate visual attention , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  Timothy D. Lee,et al.  Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis , 1982 .

[15]  Jon Driver,et al.  Reward Facilitates Tactile Judgments and Modulates Hemodynamic Responses in Human Primary Somatosensory Cortex , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  Ulrik R. Beierholm,et al.  Causal inference in perception , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  E. Rolls,et al.  The orbitofrontal cortex and beyond: From affect to decision-making , 2008, Progress in Neurobiology.

[18]  W. Schultz Multiple reward signals in the brain , 2000, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[19]  J. Lewald,et al.  Horizontal and vertical effects of eye-position on sound localization , 2006, Hearing Research.

[20]  Jörg Lewald,et al.  Visual and proprioceptive shifts in perceived egocentric direction induced by eye-position , 2000, Vision Research.

[21]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Neural Basis of the Ventriloquist Illusion , 2007, Current Biology.

[22]  Fabrizio Leo,et al.  Independent mechanisms for ventriloquism and multisensory integration as revealed by theta‐burst stimulation , 2010, The European journal of neuroscience.

[23]  R. Paz,et al.  Negative Valence Widens Generalization of Learning , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  Michael M Merzenich,et al.  Perceptual Learning Directs Auditory Cortical Map Reorganization through Top-Down Influences , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  Shihab A Shamma,et al.  Task reward structure shapes rapid receptive field plasticity in auditory cortex , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  Sound-Induced Flash Illusion is Resistant to Feedback Training , 2004, Brain Topography.

[27]  Marc O Ernst,et al.  Knowledge about a Common Source Can Promote Visual — Haptic Integration , 2007, Perception.

[28]  Aaron R. Seitz,et al.  Rewards Evoke Learning of Unconsciously Processed Visual Stimuli in Adult Humans , 2009, Neuron.

[29]  Y. Yen,et al.  Deactivation of Sensory-Specific Cortex by Cross-Modal Stimuli , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[30]  J. Maunsell Neuronal representations of cognitive state: reward or attention? , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[31]  L. M. Warner,et al.  The Neural Mechanisms for Minimizing Cross-Modal Distraction , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  D. Senkowski,et al.  The multifaceted interplay between attention and multisensory integration , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[33]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  Automatic visual bias of perceived auditory location , 1998 .

[34]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  Neural representation of visual objects: encoding and top-down activation , 2000, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[35]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Merging the senses into a robust percept , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[36]  R. Zatorre,et al.  Attention to simultaneous unrelated auditory and visual events: behavioral and neural correlates. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[37]  Stefano Fusi,et al.  Emotion, cognition, and mental state representation in amygdala and prefrontal cortex. , 2010, Annual review of neuroscience.

[38]  L. Pessoa How do emotion and motivation direct executive control? , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[39]  C. Spence,et al.  Spatial attention and audiovisual interactions in apparent motion. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  M. Wallace,et al.  Visual Localization Ability Influences Cross-Modal Bias , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[41]  R. Dolan,et al.  Influence of Dopaminergically Mediated Reward on Somatosensory Decision-Making , 2009, PLoS biology.

[42]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Perceptual load influences auditory space perception in the ventriloquist aftereffect , 2011, Cognition.

[43]  Masataka Watanabe,et al.  Role of anticipated reward in cognitive behavioral control , 2007, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[44]  Mario Maiworm,et al.  When emotional valence modulates audiovisual integration , 2012, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[45]  Kazuyuki Aihara,et al.  Bayesian Inference Explains Perception of Unity and Ventriloquism Aftereffect: Identification of Common Sources of Audiovisual Stimuli , 2007, Neural Computation.

[46]  T. Bachmann,et al.  Cognitive contributions to the perception of spatial and temporal events (Advances in Psychology, Vol. 129) , 1999 .

[47]  Brigitte Röder,et al.  Tactile capture of auditory localization: an event‐related potential study , 2010, The European journal of neuroscience.

[48]  Daniel C. Krawczyk,et al.  Reward modulation of prefrontal and visual association cortex during an incentive working memory task , 2007, Brain Research.

[49]  Ilana B. Witten,et al.  Why Seeing Is Believing: Merging Auditory and Visual Worlds , 2005, Neuron.

[50]  P. Bertelson,et al.  The psychology of multimodal perception , 2004 .

[51]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Causal Inference in Multisensory Perception , 2007, PloS one.

[52]  Marty G. Woldorff,et al.  Multisensory conflict modulates the spread of visual attention across a multisensory object , 2010, NeuroImage.

[53]  Paul J. Laurienti,et al.  Modality-specific selective attention attenuates multisensory integration , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[54]  Winfried Schlee,et al.  Top-Down Modulation of the Auditory Steady-State Response in a Task-Switch Paradigm , 2008, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[55]  G. Recanzone Interactions of auditory and visual stimuli in space and time , 2009, Hearing Research.

[56]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[57]  Rony Paz,et al.  Auditory aversive learning increases discrimination thresholds , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[58]  M. Kringelbach The human orbitofrontal cortex: linking reward to hedonic experience , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[59]  E. Rolls,et al.  The Orbitofrontal Cortex , 2019 .

[60]  J. Vroomen,et al.  Intersensory binding across space and time: A tutorial review , 2013, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[61]  Jean Vroomen,et al.  Illusory sound shifts induced by the ventriloquist illusion evoke the mismatch negativity , 2004, Neuroscience Letters.

[62]  P. Berkes,et al.  Statistically Optimal Perception and Learning: from Behavior to Neural Representations , 2022 .

[63]  Mario Maiworm,et al.  Integrative processing of perception and reward in an auditory localization paradigm. , 2011, Experimental psychology.

[64]  R. Welch Chapter 15 Meaning, attention, and the “unity assumption” in the intersensory bias of spatial and temporal perceptions , 1999 .

[65]  Lizabeth M Romanski,et al.  Representation and integration of auditory and visual stimuli in the primate ventral lateral prefrontal cortex. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[66]  W. Schultz Behavioral theories and the neurophysiology of reward. , 2006, Annual review of psychology.

[67]  John T Serences,et al.  Value-Based Modulations in Human Visual Cortex , 2008, Neuron.

[68]  R. Paz,et al.  Monetary Loss Alters Perceptual Thresholds and Compromises Future Decisions via Amygdala and Prefrontal Networks , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[69]  Maria Concetta Morrone,et al.  Influence of saccadic adaptation on spatial localization: comparison of verbal and pointing reports. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[70]  T. Stanford,et al.  Multisensory integration: current issues from the perspective of the single neuron , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[71]  D. Gitelman,et al.  Monetary incentives enhance processing in brain regions mediating top-down control of attention. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[72]  P. Vuilleumier,et al.  How brains beware: neural mechanisms of emotional attention , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[73]  C. Spence,et al.  Review: The New Handbook of Multisensory Processing: Sensory Ecology, Behaviour, and Evolution , 2013 .

[74]  Brigitte Röder,et al.  Spatial Remapping in the Audio-tactile Ventriloquism Effect: A TMS Investigation on the Role of the Ventral Intraparietal Area , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[75]  R. Campbell,et al.  Audiovisual Integration of Speech Falters under High Attention Demands , 2005, Current Biology.

[76]  D. Burr,et al.  The Ventriloquist Effect Results from Near-Optimal Bimodal Integration , 2004, Current Biology.

[77]  D. H. Warren,et al.  Immediate perceptual response to intersensory discrepancy. , 1980, Psychological bulletin.

[78]  P. Bertelson,et al.  The ventriloquist effect does not depend on the direction of automatic visual attention , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[79]  Béatrice de Gelder,et al.  Ventriloquism in patients with unilateral visual neglect , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[80]  C. Spence,et al.  Crossmodal Space and Crossmodal Attention , 2004 .