The mechanism distinguishability problem in biochemical kinetics: the single-enzyme, single-substrate reaction as a case study.

A theoretical analysis of the distinguishability problem of two rival models of the single enzyme-single substrate reaction, the Michaelis-Menten and Henri mechanisms, is presented. We also outline a general approach for analysing the structural indistinguishability between two mechanisms. The approach involves constructing, if possible, a smooth mapping between the two candidate models. Evans et al. [N.D. Evans, M.J. Chappell, M.J. Chapman, K.R. Godfrey, Structural indistinguishability between uncontrolled (autonomous) nonlinear analytic systems, Automatica 40 (2004) 1947-1953] have shown that if, in addition, either of the mechanisms satisfies a particular criterion then such a transformation always exists when the models are indistinguishable from their experimentally observable outputs. The approach is applied to the single enzyme-single substrate reaction mechanism. In principle, mechanisms can be distinguished using this analysis, but we show that our ability to distinguish mechanistic models depends both on the precise measurements made, and on our knowledge of the system prior to performing the kinetics experiments.

[1]  C. Walter,et al.  Steady-state applications in enzyme kinetics , 1965 .

[2]  S. Fukuzumi,et al.  Transition-state barrier for electrophilic reactions. Solvation of charge-transfer ion pairs as the unifying factor in alkene addition and aromatic substitution with bromine , 1982 .

[3]  R. Bellman,et al.  On structural identifiability , 1970 .

[4]  Foundation stones of biochemistry: By T. R. C. Boyde. Pp. 316. Voile et Aviron, Hong Kong (or 23 Hartington Grove, Cambridge). 1980. £10.00 , 1982 .

[5]  Keith R. Godfrey,et al.  Structural indistinguishability between uncontrolled (autonomous) nonlinear analytic systems , 2004, Autom..

[6]  Chemical relaxation of cyclic enzyme systems. V. The Michaelis and Henri schemes. , 1971, Journal of theoretical biology.

[7]  Irving R. Epstein,et al.  An Introduction to Nonlinear Chemical Dynamics: Oscillations, Waves, Patterns, and Chaos , 1998 .

[8]  P. Maini,et al.  A Century of Enzyme Kinetics: Reliability of the K M and v v max Estimates , 2003 .

[9]  H. W. Wiley LOIS GÉNÉRALES DE L'ACTION DES DIASTASES. , 1903 .

[10]  A. Fersht Structure and mechanism in protein science , 1998 .

[11]  Marc R. Roussel,et al.  Geometry of the steady-state approximation: Perturbation and accelerated convergence methods , 1990 .

[12]  Marc R. Roussel,et al.  Accurate steady-state approximations : implications for kinetics experiments and mechanism , 1991 .

[13]  D. Chipman,et al.  Models for nicotinamide coenzymes. Isotope effect discrepancies in the reaction of dihydronicotinamides with trifluoroacetophenone are due to adduct formation , 1980 .

[14]  P. McSharry,et al.  Mathematical and computational techniques to deduce complex biochemical reaction mechanisms. , 2004, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[15]  Santiago Schnell,et al.  Mechanism Equivalence in Enzyme–Substrate Reactions: Distributed Differential Delay in Enzyme Kinetics , 2004 .

[16]  James H. Espenson,et al.  Chemical kinetics and reaction mechanisms , 1981 .

[17]  R. Penrose On best approximate solutions of linear matrix equations , 1956, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[18]  Bengt Nölting,et al.  Protein Folding Kinetics: Biophysical Methods , 1999 .

[19]  K. Hiromi Kinetics of fast enzyme reactions: Theory and practice , 1979 .

[20]  R. Viale Similarities and differences in the kinetics of the Michaelis scheme and the Henri scheme. , 1970, Journal of theoretical biology.

[21]  Brian G. Cox,et al.  Modern Liquid Phase Kinetics , 1994 .

[22]  Péter Érdi,et al.  Mathematical models of chemical reactions , 1989 .

[23]  Dunford Hb,et al.  Studies on Horseradish Peroxidase IX. KINETICS OF THE OXIDATION OF p-CRESOL BY COMPOUND II , 1972 .

[24]  P. Maini,et al.  Enzyme kinetics at high enzyme concentration , 2000, Bulletin of mathematical biology.