Incidence and Outcome of BRCA Mutations in Unselected Patients with Triple Receptor-Negative Breast Cancer

Purpose: To investigate the incidence of germline and somatic BRCA1/2 mutations in unselected patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and determine the prognostic significance of carrying a mutation. Methods: DNA was obtained from 77 TNBC and normal tissues. BRCA1/2 exons/flanking regions were sequenced from tumor and patients classified as mutant or wild type (WT). Sequencing was repeated from normal tissue to identify germline and somatic mutations. Patient characteristics were compared with chi-square. Survival was estimated by Kaplan–Meier method and compared with log-rank. Cox proportional hazards models were fit to determine the independent association of mutation status with outcome. Results: Median age was 51 years (27–83 years). Fifteen patients (19.5%) had BRCA mutations: 12 (15.6%) in BRCA1 (one somatic), and 3 (3.9%) in BRCA2. Patients with BRCA mutations tended to be younger than WT, (P = 0.005). Grade, histology, and stage were not associated with mutation status. At a median follow-up of 43 months (7–214 months), there were 33 (42.9%) recurrences and 35 (45.5%) deaths. Five-year recurrence-free survival estimates were 51.7% for WT versus 86.2% for patients with mutations, (P = 0.031); and 5-year overall survival estimates were 52.8% for WT versus 73.3% for patients with mutations (P = 0.225). After adjustment, patients with BRCA mutations had a significantly better RFS (HR: 0.19, 95% CI: 0.045–0.79, P = 0.016) compared with WT. Conclusions: In this unselected cohort of TNBC, we found a 19.5% incidence of BRCA mutations. Genetic testing should be discussed with patients with TNBC. Patients with TNBC with BRCA mutations had a significantly lower risk of relapse. Clin Cancer Res; 17(5); 1082–9. ©2011 AACR.

[1]  K. Gelmon,et al.  Oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and advanced breast cancer: a proof-of-concept trial , 2011 .

[2]  J. Kwon,et al.  Expanding the criteria for BRCA mutation testing in breast cancer survivors. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  G. Mills,et al.  Somatic mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 could expand the number of patients that benefit from poly (ADP ribose) polymerase inhibitors in ovarian cancer. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  Mark Robson,et al.  Oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and advanced breast cancer: a proof-of-concept trial , 2010, The Lancet.

[5]  A. Tutt,et al.  Oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and recurrent ovarian cancer: a proof-of-concept trial , 2010, The Lancet.

[6]  Anthony Rhodes,et al.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer. , 2010, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[7]  M. Federico,et al.  Favourable ten-year overall survival in a Caucasian population with high probability of hereditary breast cancer , 2010, BMC Cancer.

[8]  A. Ashworth,et al.  Inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in tumors from BRCA mutation carriers. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  P. Goodwin,et al.  Prognosis of BRCA-associated breast cancer: a summary of evidence , 2009, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[10]  Stephanie A Cohen,et al.  The prevalence of BRCA1 mutations among young women with triple-negative breast cancer , 2009, BMC Cancer.

[11]  Christopher I Amos,et al.  Clinical and pathologic characteristics of patients with BRCA-positive and BRCA-negative breast cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  Caroline Seynaeve,et al.  Distant disease-free interval, site of first relapse and post-relapse survival in BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated compared to sporadic breast cancer patients , 2008, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[13]  S. Schnitt,et al.  Prevalence of BRCA1 mutations in triple negative breast cancer (BC). , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  C. Perou,et al.  Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. , 2006, JAMA.

[15]  Alan Ashworth,et al.  Targeting the DNA repair defect in BRCA mutant cells as a therapeutic strategy , 2005, Nature.

[16]  I. Bedrosian The prognostic implication of the basal-like (cyclin Ehigh/ p27low/p53+glomeruloid-microvascular-proliferation +) phenotype of BRCA1-related breast cancer , 2005 .

[17]  A. Ashworth,et al.  Hallmarks of 'BRCAness' in sporadic cancers , 2004, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[18]  William D. Foulkes,et al.  Re: Germline BRCA1 Mutations and a Basal Epithelial Phenotype in Breast Cancer , 2004 .

[19]  O. Olopade,et al.  Estrogen Receptor Status in BRCA1- and BRCA2-Related Breast Cancer , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.

[20]  L. Bégin,et al.  The Prognostic Implication of the Basal-Like (Cyclin Ehigh/p27low/p53+/Glomeruloid-Microvascular-Proliferation+) Phenotype of BRCA1-Related Breast Cancer , 2004, Cancer Research.

[21]  L. Bégin,et al.  Advances in Brief The Prognostic Implication of the Basal-Like ( Cyclin Ehigh / p 27 low / p 53 / Glomeruloid-Microvascular-Proliferation ) Phenotype of BRCA 1-Related Breast Cancer , 2004 .

[22]  L. Bégin,et al.  Germline BRCA1 mutations and a basal epithelial phenotype in breast cancer. , 2004, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[23]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  J. Sng,et al.  Pathological features and BRCA1 mutation screening in premenopausal breast cancer patients. , 2001, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[26]  D. Birnbaum,et al.  Major improvement in the efficacy of BRCA1 mutation screening using morphoclinical features of breast cancer. , 2000, Cancer research.

[27]  L. Tsui,et al.  A suggested nomenclature for designating mutations , 1993, Human mutation.