Research Participants' Perspectives on Genotype-Driven Research Recruitment

Genotype-driven recruitment is a potentially powerful approach for studying human genetic variation but presents ethical challenges. We conducted in-depth interviews with research participants in six studies where such recruitment occurred. Nearly all responded favorably to the acceptability of recontact for research recruitment, and genotype-driven recruitment was viewed as a positive sign of scientific advancement. Reactions to questions about the disclosure of individual genetic research results varied. Common themes included explaining the purpose of recontact, informing decisions about further participation, reciprocity, “information is valuable,” and the possibility of benefit, as well as concerns about undue distress and misunderstanding. Our findings suggest contact about additional research may be least concerning if it involves a known element (e.g., trusted researchers). Also, for genotype-driven recruitment, it may be appropriate to set a lower bar for disclosure of individual results than the clinical utility threshold recommended more generally.

[1]  Eleanor McLellan,et al.  Codebook Development for Team-Based Qualitative Analysis , 1998 .

[2]  E. Emanuel,et al.  The debate over research on stored biological samples: what do sources think? , 2002, Archives of internal medicine.

[3]  Jeremy Sugarman,et al.  Ethical issues in identifying and recruiting participants for familial genetic research , 2004, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[4]  Gail P Jarvik,et al.  Reporting genetic results in research studies: Summary and recommendations of an NHLBI working group , 2006, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[5]  P. Blackshear,et al.  The Environmental Polymorphisms Registry: a DNA resource to study genetic susceptibility loci , 2008, Human Genetics.

[6]  Kathy Hudson,et al.  Subjects matter: a survey of public opinions about a large genetic cohort study , 2008, Genetics in Medicine.

[7]  Amy L McGuire,et al.  Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater: enabling a bottom-up approach in genome-wide association studies. , 2008, Genome research.

[8]  Gail Geller,et al.  Public Expectations for Return of Results from Large-Cohort Genetic Research , 2008, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.

[9]  Robert Cook-Deegan,et al.  Disclosure of APOE genotype for risk of Alzheimer's disease. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  Wendy A. Wolf,et al.  Assessing the understanding of biobank participants , 2009, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[11]  L. Beskow,et al.  Prospective Biorepository Participants' Perspectives on Access to Research Results , 2009, Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE.

[12]  George Church,et al.  Ethical and Practical Guidelines for Reporting Genetic Research Results to Study Participants: Updated Guidelines from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Working Group , 2010, Circulation. Cardiovascular genetics.

[13]  G. Koppelman,et al.  Communication of biobanks' research results: What do (potential) participants want? , 2010, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[14]  David B Goldstein,et al.  Ethical challenges in genotype-driven research recruitment. , 2010, Genome research.

[15]  G. Henderson,et al.  The Meaning of Genetic Research Results: Reflections from Individuals with and without a Known Genetic Disorder , 2011, Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE.

[16]  Epilepsy Patient-Participants and Genetic Research Results as “Answers” , 2011, Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE.

[17]  S. Fullerton,et al.  Parent Perspectives on Pediatric Genetic Research and Implications for Genotype-Driven Research Recruitment , 2011, Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE.

[18]  Stephanie M. Fullerton,et al.  Offering aggregate results to participants in genomic research: opportunities and challenges , 2012, Genetics in Medicine.

[19]  L. Beskow,et al.  IRB chairs' perspectives on genotype-driven research recruitment. , 2012, IRB.