A cluster randomized controlled trial of child-focused psychiatric consultation and a school systems-focused intervention to reduce aggression.

BACKGROUND While school-based anti-bullying programs are widely used, there have been few controlled trials of effectiveness. This study compared the effect of manualized School Psychiatric Consultation (SPC), CAPSLE (a systems and mentalization focused whole school intervention), and treatment-as-usual (TAU) in reducing aggression and victimization among elementary school children. METHOD Participants were 1,345 third to fifth graders in nine elementary schools in a medium-sized Midwestern city who took part in a cluster-level randomized controlled trial with stratified restricted allocation, to assess efficacy after two years of active intervention and effectiveness after one year of minimal input maintenance intervention. Outcome measures included peer and self-reports of bullying, bystanding, and mentalizing behavior and classroom behavioral observations of disruptive and off-task behavior. RESULTS CAPSLE moderated the developmental trend of increasing peer-reported victimization (p < .01), aggression (p < .05), self-reported aggression (p < .05) and aggressive bystanding (p < .05), compared to TAU schools. CAPSLE also moderated a decline in empathy and an increase in the percent of children victimized compared to SPC (p < .01) and TAU conditions (p < .01). Results for self-reported victimization, helpful bystanding, and beliefs in the legitimacy of aggression did not suggest significantly different changes among the study conditions over time. CAPSLE produced a significant decrease in off-task (p < .001) and disruptive classroom behaviors (p < .01), while behavioral change was not observed in SPC and TAU schools. Superiority with respect to TAU for victimization (p < .05), aggression (p < .01), and helpful (p < .05) and aggressive bystanding (p < .01) were maintained in the follow-up year. CONCLUSIONS A teacher-implemented school-wide intervention that does not focus on disturbed children substantially reduced aggression and improved classroom behavior.

[1]  P. Fonagy,et al.  Teacher Adherence and Its Relation to Teacher Attitudes and Student Outcomes in an Elementary School-Based Violence Prevention Program , 2008 .

[2]  J. Coid,et al.  Early Prevention of Adult Antisocial Behaviour , 2007 .

[3]  Daniel J. Bauer,et al.  Computational Tools for Probing Interactions in Multiple Linear Regression, Multilevel Modeling, and Latent Curve Analysis , 2006 .

[4]  R. Blair.  Responding to the emotions of others: Dissociating forms of empathy through the study of typical and psychiatric populations , 2005, Consciousness and Cognition.

[5]  T. Little,et al.  Creating a peaceful school learning environment: the impact of an antibullying program on educational attainment in elementary schools. , 2005, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.

[6]  P. Fonagy,et al.  Negative Affect in Victimized Children: The Roles of Social Withdrawal, Peer Rejection, and Attitudes Toward Bullying , 2004, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[7]  Internalizing Problems in Students Involved in Bullying and Victimization: Implications for Intervention , 2004 .

[8]  D. Espelage,et al.  Bullying in American schools : a social-ecological perspective on prevention and intervention , 2004 .

[9]  Peter K. Smith,et al.  Interventions to Reduce School Bullying , 2003, Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie.

[10]  P. Fonagy.  Towards a developmental understanding of violence , 2003, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[11]  Joseph E. Zins,et al.  Enhancing school-based prevention and youth development through coordinated social, emotional, and academic learning. , 2003, The American psychologist.

[12]  M. Shafii,et al.  School Violence, Depression, and Suicide , 2003 .

[13]  P. Scheidt,et al.  Relationships between bullying and violence among US youth. , 2003, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[14]  James H Derzon,et al.  The effects of school-based intervention programs on aggressive behavior: a meta-analysis. , 2003, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[15]  D. Gough,et al.  School-based violence prevention programs: systematic review of secondary prevention trials. , 2002, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[16]  J. Schafer,et al.  Missing data: our view of the state of the art. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[17]  G. Ladd,et al.  Identifying victims of peer aggression from early to middle childhood: analysis of cross-informant data for concordance, estimation of relational adjustment, prevalence of victimization, and characteristics of identified victims. , 2002, Psychological assessment.

[18]  Pete Smith,et al.  Bullying and ‘Theory of Mind’: A Critique of the ‘Social Skills Deficit’ View of Anti‐Social Behaviour , 2001 .

[19]  J. Schafer,et al.  A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures. , 2001, Psychological methods.

[20]  H. Stern,et al.  The use of multiple imputation for the analysis of missing data. , 2001, Psychological methods.

[21]  David B. Wilson,et al.  School-Based Prevention of Problem Behaviors: A Meta-Analysis , 2001 .

[22]  P Fonagy,et al.  Creating a peaceful school learning environment: a controlled study of an elementary school intervention to reduce violence. , 2001, The American journal of psychiatry.

[23]  I. Berkovitz.  Evaluations of outcome in mental health consultation in schools. , 2001, Child and adolescent psychiatric clinics of North America.

[24]  K. Kumpulainen,et al.  Children involved in bullying at elementary school age: their psychiatric symptoms and deviance in adolescence. An epidemiological sample. , 2000, Child abuse & neglect.

[25]  Gregory Camilli,et al.  Application of a Method of Estimating DIF for Polytomous Test Items , 1999 .

[26]  Pete Smith,et al.  Social cognition and bullying: Social inadequacy or skilled manipulation? , 1999 .

[27]  S. Hershberger,et al.  Peer victimization and attitudes about violence during early adolescence. , 1999, Journal of clinical child psychology.

[28]  Judith D. Singer,et al.  Using SAS PROC MIXED to Fit Multilevel Models, Hierarchical Models, and Individual Growth Models , 1998 .

[29]  J. Jennings,et al.  A program of comprehensive school-based mental health services in a large urban public school district: The Dallas model , 1998 .

[30]  N. Crick,et al.  Relational and overt forms of peer victimization: a multiinformant approach. , 1998, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[31]  Ann S. Masten,et al.  The development of competence in favorable and unfavorable environments: Lessons from successful children: Major themes , 1998 .

[32]  A. Masten,et al.  The development of competence in favorable and unfavorable environments. Lessons from research on successful children. , 1998, The American psychologist.

[33]  D. Olweus,et al.  Bullying at School: Knowledge Base and an Effective Intervention Program a , 1996 .

[34]  D. Rubin.  Multiple Imputation After 18+ Years , 1996 .

[35]  Peter K. Smith,et al.  Theories of Theories of Mind , 1996 .

[36]  Peter K. Smith.  Theories of theories of mind: Language and the evolution of mind-reading , 1996 .

[37]  S. Twemlow,et al.  A clinical and interactionist perspective on the bully-victim-bystander relationship. , 1996, Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic.

[38]  Peter K. Smith,et al.  School Bullying: Insights and Perspectives , 1994 .

[39]  Peter K. Smith,et al.  Tackling Bullying in Your School : A practical handbook for teachers , 1994 .

[40]  J. Lochman.  Cognitive-behavioral intervention with aggressive boys: three-year follow-up and preventive effects. , 1992, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[41]  D. G. Perry,et al.  Victims of Peer Aggression. , 1988 .

[42]  S. Raudenbush,et al.  Application of Hierarchical Linear Models to Assessing Change , 1987 .

[43]  R. Milich,et al.  Validation of inattention/overactivity and aggression ratings with classroom observations. , 1985, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.