Multinational Corporations and Emissions Trading: Strategic Responses to New Institutional Constraints

Although the Kyoto Protocol intended to implement emissions trading globally, this has so far been impossible. As a result, particularly Multinational Corporations (MNCs) currently face a wide variety of emissions trading schemes that differ in scope and enforcement, thus creating divergent levels of institutional constraints across locations. This article sheds light on the implications of these new constraints for MNCs, and also explores their responses to emissions trading schemes in terms of (perceived) opportunities to (re)shape the institution. Findings on strategic responses of Global 500 companies expose the constraints of particularly the EU emissions trading scheme, as well as the opportunities being explored or already exploited in various ways in this scheme and other emerging ones. Based on these findings the article proposes a framework that discerns four scenarios in which MNCs can find themselves: institutional conformist, institutional evader, institutional entrepreneur and institutional arbitrageur.

[1]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[2]  Michael Grubb,et al.  The Kyoto Protocol: A Guide and Assessment , 1999 .

[3]  Kristi Jackson,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo , 2007 .

[4]  K. Neuhoff,et al.  CO2 cost pass-through and windfall profits in the power sector , 2006 .

[5]  J. Pinkse.  Corporate intentions to participate in emission trading , 2007 .

[6]  W. Pizer,et al.  GREENHOUSE GAS TRADING IN EUROPE: The New Grand Policy Experiment , 2004 .

[7]  Karen Clay,et al.  THE CHOICE-WITHIN-CONSTRAINTS NEW INSTITUTIONALISM AND IMPLICATIONS FOR SOCIOLOGY , 2000 .

[8]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[9]  B. Rabe,et al.  Second Generation Climate Policies in the American States: Proliferation, Diffusion, and Regionalization , 2006 .

[10]  M. Djelic,et al.  Theoretical Building Blocks for a Research Agenda Linking Globalization and Institutions , 2003 .

[11]  N. Fligstein,et al.  Social Skill and Institutional Theory , 1997 .

[12]  Atle Christer Christiansen,et al.  The EU as a frontrunner on greenhouse gas emissions trading: how did it happen and will the EU succeed? , 2003 .

[13]  A. Kolk,et al.  Multinationals' Political Activities on Climate Change , 2007 .

[14]  David L. Levy,et al.  Strategic Responses to Global Climate Change: Conflicting Pressures on Multinationals in the Oil Industry , 2002, Business and Politics.

[15]  Laura Haar,et al.  Policy-making under uncertainty: Commentary upon the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme , 2006 .

[16]  Paul DiMaggio.  Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory , 1988 .

[17]  Peter Markussen,et al.  Industry lobbying and the political economy of GHG trade in the European Union , 2005 .

[18]  A. Denny Ellerman,et al.  Over-Allocation or Abatement? A Preliminary Analysis of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme Based on the 2005 Emissions Data , 2006 .

[19]  John Child,et al.  The Dynamic between Firms' Environmental Strategies and Institutional Constraints in Emerging Economies: Evidence from China and Taiwan , 2005 .

[20]  Cynthia Hardy,et al.  The Emergence of New Global Institutions: A Discursive Perspective , 2006 .

[21]  Brian S. Silverman,et al.  Introduction: The new institutionalism in strategic management , 2000 .

[22]  W. Creed,et al.  Institutional Contradictions, Praxis, and Institutional Change: A Dialectical Perspective , 2002 .

[23]  Silvia Dorado,et al.  Institutional Entrepreneurship, Partaking, and Convening , 2005 .

[24]  Mark C. Suchman.  Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches , 1995 .

[25]  Kirsten H. Engel.  Mitigating Global Climate Change in the United States: A Regional Approach , 2006 .

[26]  Richard L. Ottinger,et al.  Compendium of Sustainable Energy Laws: Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 Establishing a Scheme for Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowance Trading Within the Community and Amending Council Directive 96/61/EC , 2005 .

[27]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[28]  C. Oliver.  STRATEGIC RESPONSES TO INSTITUTIONAL PROCESSES , 1991 .

[29]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Institutional Entrepreneurship in Mature Fields: The Big Five Accounting Firms , 2006 .

[30]  N. Fligstein,et al.  Fields, Power and Social Skill: a Critical Analysis of the New Institutionalisms , 1999 .

[31]  C. Hardy,et al.  Institutional Entrepreneurship in Emerging Fields: HIV/AIDS Treatment Advocacy in Canada , 2004 .