SocialBrands: Visual analysis of public perceptions of brands on social media

Public perceptions of a brand is critical to its performance. While social media has demonstrated a huge potential to shape public perceptions of brands, existing tools are not intuitive and explanatory for domain users to use as they fail to provide a comprehensive analysis framework for perceptions of brands. In this paper, we present SocialBrands, a novel visual analysis tool for brand managers to understand public perceptions of brands on social media. Social-Brands leverages brand personality framework in marketing literature and social computing approaches to compute the personality of brands from three driving factors (user imagery, employee imagery, and official announcement) on social media, and construct an evidence network explaining the association between brand personality and driving factors. These computational results are then integrated with new interactive visualizations to help brand managers understand personality traits and their driving factors. We demonstrate the usefulness and effectiveness of SocialBrands through a series of user studies with brand managers in an enterprise context. Design lessons are also derived from our studies.

[1]  J. Stasko,et al.  Focus+context display and navigation techniques for enhancing radial, space-filling hierarchy visualizations , 2000, IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization 2000. INFOVIS 2000. Proceedings.

[2]  Michelle X. Zhou,et al.  KnowMe and ShareMe: understanding automatically discovered personality traits from social media and user sharing preferences , 2014, CHI.

[3]  Michael S. Bernstein,et al.  Twitinfo: aggregating and visualizing microblogs for event exploration , 2011, CHI.

[4]  Jonathan Harris,et al.  We feel fine and searching the emotional web , 2011, WSDM '11.

[5]  Jalal Mahmud,et al.  Predicting Attitude and Actions of Twitter Users , 2016, IUI.

[6]  Dieter Schmalstieg,et al.  Context-Preserving Visual Links , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[7]  Yang Wang,et al.  VeilMe: An Interactive Visualization Tool for Privacy Configuration of Using Personality Traits , 2015, CHI.

[8]  Brian T. Parker,et al.  A comparison of brand personality and brand user‐imagery congruence , 2009 .

[9]  Kristin A. Cook,et al.  Illuminating the Path: The Research and Development Agenda for Visual Analytics , 2005 .

[10]  J. Aaker,et al.  Dimensions of Brand Personality , 1997 .

[11]  Xiaohua Sun,et al.  Whisper: Tracing the Spatiotemporal Process of Information Diffusion in Real Time , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[12]  Fei Wang,et al.  PEARL: An interactive visual analytic tool for understanding personal emotion style derived from social media , 2014, 2014 IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST).

[13]  Jean-Daniel Fekete,et al.  Visual Sedimentation , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[14]  Tal Yarkoni Personality in 100,000 Words: A large-scale analysis of personality and word use among bloggers. , 2010, Journal of research in personality.

[15]  Haibin Liu,et al.  Predicting Perceived Brand Personality with Social Media , 2016, ICWSM.

[16]  Yale Song,et al.  #FluxFlow: Visual Analysis of Anomalous Information Spreading on Social Media , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[17]  Roger Lamb,et al.  The Dictionary of personality and social psychology , 1986 .

[18]  M. Kosinski,et al.  Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Wayne D. Hoyer,et al.  Implementing an intended brand personality: a dyadic perspective , 2012 .

[20]  Daniel A. Keim,et al.  Visual Analytics: Definition, Process, and Challenges , 2008, Information Visualization.

[21]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[22]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Do You Know the Way to SNA?: A Process Model for Analyzing and Visualizing Social Media Network Data , 2012, 2012 International Conference on Social Informatics.

[23]  Martin Wattenberg,et al.  Google+Ripples: a native visualization of information flow , 2013, WWW '13.

[24]  Yingcai Wu,et al.  Visual Analysis of Topic Competition on Social Media , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[25]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  Useful junk?: the effects of visual embellishment on comprehension and memorability of charts , 2010, CHI.

[26]  Tamara Munzner,et al.  Visualization Analysis and Design , 2014, A.K. Peters visualization series.

[27]  M. Sheelagh T. Carpendale,et al.  A Visual Backchannel for Large-Scale Events , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[28]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods , 2010 .

[29]  Marie-Aude Aufaure,et al.  A Buzz and E-Reputation Monitoring Tool for Twitter Based on Galois Lattices , 2011, ICCS.

[30]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Latent Dirichlet Allocation , 2001, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[31]  Xiaotong Liu,et al.  CompactMap: A mental map preserving visual interface for streaming text data , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Big Data.

[32]  J. Kapferer The New Strategic Brand Management : Advanced Insights and Strategic Thinking Ed. 5 , 2012 .

[33]  J. Venn,et al.  . On the diagrammatic and mechanical representation of propositions and reasonings , 2022 .

[34]  William Ribarsky,et al.  Less After-the-Fact: Investigative visual analysis of events from streaming twitter , 2013, 2013 IEEE Symposium on Large-Scale Data Analysis and Visualization (LDAV).

[35]  Srinivasan Parthasarathy,et al.  GalaxyExplorer: Influence-Driven Visual Exploration of Context-Specific Social Media Interactions , 2015, WWW.