How much data are needed to resolve a difficult phylogeny?: case study in Lamiales.
暂无分享,去创建一个
D. Harris | P. Rudall | A. Wortley | R. Scotland | Robert W Scotland | Paula J Rudall | Alexandra H Wortley | David J Harris
[1] E. Pahlich,et al. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue , 1980 .
[2] D. Soltis,et al. Phylogenetic Analysis of Asterids Based on Sequences of Four Genes , 2001 .
[3] Claude W. dePamphilis,et al. The evolution of parasitism in Scrophulariaceae/Orobanchaceae: plastid gene sequences refute an evolutionary transition series. , 1999 .
[4] M. Miyamoto,et al. Phylogenetic Analysis of DNA Sequences , 1991 .
[5] L. Prendini,et al. Species or supraspecific taxa as terminals in cladistic analysis? Groundplans versus exemplars revisited. , 2001, Systematic biology.
[6] Junhyong Kim,et al. Large-scale phylogenies and measuring the performance of phylogenetic estimators. , 1998, Systematic biology.
[7] Apgii. An update of the angiosperm phylogeny group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants : APGII , 2003 .
[8] J. Huelsenbeck. Performance of Phylogenetic Methods in Simulation , 1995 .
[9] A. Schwarzbach,et al. Phylogenetic Relationships of the Mangrove Family Avicenniaceae Based on Chloroplast and Nuclear Ribosomal DNA Sequences , 2009 .
[10] H. Shaffer,et al. Troubleshooting Molecular Phylogenetic Analyses , 2002 .
[11] Terry Gaasterland,et al. The analysis of 100 genes supports the grouping of three highly divergent amoebae: Dictyostelium, Entamoeba, and Mastigamoeba , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[12] M Fishbein,et al. Phylogeny of Saxifragales (angiosperms, eudicots): analysis of a rapid, ancient radiation. , 2001, Systematic biology.
[13] Donald H. Colless,et al. Congruence Between Morphometric and Allozyme Data for Menidia Species: A Reappraisal , 1980 .
[14] B. Hall,et al. Phylogenetic relationships among ascomycetes: evidence from an RNA polymerse II subunit. , 1999, Molecular biology and evolution.
[15] M. Källersjö,et al. Phylogenetics of asterids based on 3 coding and 3 non-coding chloroplast DNA markers and the utility of non-coding DNA at higher taxonomic levels. , 2002, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[16] Phylogenetic relationships of the enigmatic angiosperm family Podostemaceae inferred from 18S rDNA and rbcL sequence data. , 1999, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[17] W. Atchley,et al. Separation of phylogenetic and functional associations in biological sequences by using the parametric bootstrap. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[18] Y. Yamazaki,et al. Whole chloroplast genome comparison of rice, maize, and wheat: implications for chloroplast gene diversification and phylogeny of cereals. , 2002, Molecular biology and evolution.
[19] D. Hillis. Approaches for Assessing Phylogenetic Accuracy , 1995 .
[20] Michael J Sanderson,et al. The challenge of constructing large phylogenetic trees. , 2003, Trends in plant science.
[21] D. Soltis,et al. Relationships within Cornales and circumscription of Cornaceae-matK and rbcL sequence data and effects of outgroups and long branches. , 2002, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[22] Anne Chenuil,et al. Can the Cambrian explosion be inferred through molecular phylogeny , 1994 .
[23] C. Neinhuis,et al. Angiosperm phylogeny based on matK sequence information. , 2003, American journal of botany.
[24] C. dePamphilis,et al. Disintegration of the scrophulariaceae. , 2001, American journal of botany.
[25] Lester C. Loschky,et al. What Is the Relationship , 1994 .
[26] W. Brown,et al. EVOLUTION OF ANIMAL MITOCHONDRIAL DNA: RELEVANCE FOR POPULATION BIOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS , 1987 .
[27] D. Yeates. GROUNDPLANS AND EXEMPLARS: PATHS TO THE TREE OF LIFE , 1995, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[28] V. Goremykin,et al. Analysis of the Amborella trichopoda chloroplast genome sequence suggests that amborella is not a basal angiosperm. , 2003, Molecular biology and evolution.
[29] H Philippe,et al. How many nucleotides are required to resolve a phylogenetic problem? The use of a new statistical method applicable to available sequences. , 1994, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[30] D. Maddison. The discovery and importance of multiple islands of most , 1991 .
[31] D. Hillis,et al. Taxonomic sampling, phylogenetic accuracy, and investigator bias. , 1998, Systematic biology.
[32] K. Harada,et al. Phylogenetic Relationships of Diploxylon Pines (Subgenus Pinus) Based on Plastid Sequence Data , 2002, International Journal of Plant Sciences.
[33] J. Lundberg,et al. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants : APG II THE ANGIOSPERM PHYLOGENY GROUP * , 2003 .
[34] James F. Smith,et al. Tribal Relationships in the Gesneriaceae: Evidence from DNA Sequences of the Chloroplast Gene ndh F , 1997 .
[35] R. Olmstead,et al. PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF BIGNONIACEAE BASED ON THE CPDNA GENE SEQUENCES RBCL AND NDHF , 1999 .
[36] J. C. Regier,et al. More taxa or more characters revisited: combining data from nuclear protein-encoding genes for phylogenetic analyses of Noctuoidea (Insecta: Lepidoptera). , 2000, Systematic biology.
[37] R. Olmstead,et al. A simulation study of reduced tree-search effort in bootstrap resampling analysis. , 2000, Systematic biology.
[38] D. Hillis,et al. Molecular Versus Morphological Approaches to Systematics , 1987 .
[39] Hervé Philippe,et al. Early–branching or fast–evolving eukaryotes? An answer based on slowly evolving positions , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[40] S. Renner,et al. What Is the Relationship among Hernandiaceae, Lauraceae, and Monimiaceae, and Why Is This Question So Difficult to Answer? , 2000, International Journal of Plant Sciences.
[41] M. Källersjö,et al. Phylogenetic relationships in the order Ericales s.l.: analyses of molecular data from five genes from the plastid and mitochondrial genomes. , 2002, American journal of botany.
[42] Andrew Rambaut,et al. Seq-Gen: an application for the Monte Carlo simulation of DNA sequence evolution along phylogenetic trees , 1997, Comput. Appl. Biosci..
[43] S. Carroll,et al. Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies , 2003, Nature.
[44] F. Sperling,et al. Interaction of process partitions in phylogenetic analysis: an example from the swallowtail butterfly genus Papilio. , 1999, Molecular biology and evolution.
[45] David Posada,et al. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution , 1998, Bioinform..
[46] D. Hillis. Inferring complex phytogenies , 1996, Nature.
[47] Derrick J. Zwickl,et al. Increased taxon sampling is advantageous for phylogenetic inference. , 2002, Systematic biology.
[48] MOLECULAR AND MORPHOLOGICAL DATA PROVIDE PHYLOGENETIC RESOLUTION AT DIFFERENT HIERARCHICAL LEVELS IN ANDIRA , 1996 .
[49] R. Olmstead,et al. Redefining Phrymaceae: the placement of Mimulus, tribe Mimuleae, and Phryma. , 2002, American journal of botany.
[50] K. Winka,et al. Ribosomal DNA and resolution of branching order among the ascomycota: how many nucleotides are enough? , 2000, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[51] Z. Yang. On the best evolutionary rate for phylogenetic analysis. , 1998, Systematic biology.
[52] R. Olmstead,et al. Phylogeny of Poaceae subfamily Pooideae based on chloroplast ndhF gene sequences. , 1997, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[53] Derrick J. Zwickl,et al. Is sparse taxon sampling a problem for phylogenetic inference? , 2003, Systematic biology.
[54] D. Soltis,et al. Clarification of the relationship beteen Apiaceae and Araliaceae based on matK and rbcL sequence data. , 1997, American journal of botany.
[55] R. Olmstead,et al. Phylogeny inLabiatae s. l., inferred from cpDNA sequences , 1998, Plant Systematics and Evolution.
[56] Joaquin Dopazo,et al. Monte Carlo simulation in phylogenies: An application to test the constancy of evolutionary rates , 1994, Journal of Molecular Evolution.
[57] Joan D. Ferraris,et al. Molecular Zoology: Advances, Strategies, and Protocols , 1997 .
[58] Mark P. Simmons,et al. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. , 2000, Systematic biology.
[59] S. Graham,et al. Phylogenetic congruence and discordance among one morphological and three molecular data sets from Pontederiaceae. , 1998, Systematic biology.
[60] Richard G. Olmstead,et al. HIGHER-LEVEL SYSTEMATICS OF ACANTHACEAE DETERMINED BY CHLOROPLAST DNA SEQUENCES , 1995 .
[61] D. Soltis,et al. Inferring complex phylogenies using parsimony: an empirical approach using three large DNA data sets for angiosperms. , 1998, Systematic biology.
[62] D. Swofford. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), Version 4.0b10 , 2002 .
[63] M. Källersjö,et al. Maesaceae, a new primuloid family in the order Ericales s.l , 2000 .
[64] M. Chase,et al. Higher-level classification in the angiosperms: new insights from the perspective of DNA sequence data , 2000 .
[65] C. Bult,et al. TESTING SIGNIFICANCE OF INCONGRUENCE , 1994 .
[66] A. Graybeal,et al. Is it better to add taxa or characters to a difficult phylogenetic problem? , 1998, Systematic biology.
[67] Doolittle Wf. Phylogenetic Classification and the Universal Tree , 1999 .
[68] Elizabeth A. Kellogg,et al. An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants , 1998 .