Identification and calibration of the interaction matrix parameters for AO and MCAO systems

New tomographic Adaptive Optics (AO) concepts require a good knowledge of the system geometry and characteristics. These parameters are used to feed the tomographic reconstructors. In this paper we present a method to precisely identify the parameters required to construct an accurate synthetic set of models such as inuence functions, mis-registrations, directions of analysis or altitude of the DMs. The method is based on a multiparameter t of the interaction matrix. This identication method nds also its application in high contrast AO systems, such as SPHERE : in that case it is used as a diagnostic tool in order to precisely realign the system. The method has been tested and successfully implemented on HOMER, SPHERE and GeMS. Experimental results for these three systems are presented.

[1]  François Rigaut,et al.  Gemini South MCAO on-sky results , 2011 .

[2]  G Rousset,et al.  High-order adaptive optics requirements for direct detection of extrasolar planets: Application to the SPHERE instrument. , 2006, Optics express.

[3]  B. Macintosh,et al.  Spatially filtered wave-front sensor for high-order adaptive optics. , 2004, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[4]  L M Mugnier,et al.  Optimal wave-front reconstruction strategies for multiconjugate adaptive optics. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[5]  Francois Rigaut,et al.  Atmospheric turbulence profiling using multiple laser star wavefront sensors , 2012 .

[6]  A. Sevin,et al.  Tomography reconstruction using the Learn and Apply algorithm , 2010 .

[7]  S. Stroebele,et al.  Large DM AO systems: synthetic IM or calibration on sky? , 2006, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[8]  Pierre Baudoz,et al.  Integration, tests and laboratory performance of SAXO, the VLT-SPHERE extreme AO system , 2011 .

[9]  B L Ellerbroek,et al.  Real-time turbulence profiling with a pair of laser guide star Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensors for wide-field adaptive optics systems on large to extremely large telescopes. , 2010, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[10]  Serge Meimon,et al.  The Slope-Oriented Hadamard scheme for in-lab or on-sky interaction matrix calibration , 2011 .

[11]  David Mouillet,et al.  The SPHERE XAO system: design and performance , 2008, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[12]  C. Kulcsár,et al.  Wide field adaptive optics laboratory demonstration with closed-loop tomographic control. , 2010, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[13]  Thierry Fusco,et al.  Closed-loop tomographic control on HOMER wide-field AO bench: experimental results and identification issues , 2010, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[14]  J. Conan,et al.  Tomographic reconstruction for wide-field adaptive optics systems: Fourier domain analysis and fundamental limitations. , 2008, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[15]  G Rousset,et al.  Closed-loop experimental validation of the spatially filtered Shack-Hartmann concept. , 2005, Optics letters.

[16]  D. Marquardt An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters , 1963 .

[17]  Johann Kolb,et al.  Calibration and test tools for MCAO system : application to the ESO demonstrator MAD , 2005 .

[18]  D. Looze,et al.  Fast calibration of high-order adaptive optics systems. , 2004, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[19]  Sebastien Tordo Integration and alignment of adaptive optics systems: 10 years of experience at the VLT , 2010, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[20]  Michael D. Oliker Alignment techniques for DM, Lenslet, and WFS camera at the SOR , 1997, Optics & Photonics.

[21]  M. Lombini,et al.  The Gemini MCAO System GeMS: nearing the end of a lab-story , 2010, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.