Public Knowledge of and Attitudes to Science: Alternative Measures That May End the “Science War”

Research on the public understanding of science has measured knowledge as acquaintance with scientific facts and methods and attitudes as evaluations of societal consequences of science and technology. The authors propose alternative concepts and measures: knowledge of the workings of scientific institutions and attitudes to the nature of science. The viability, reliability, and validity of the new measures are demonstrated on British and Bulgarian data. The instrument consists of twenty items and takes ten to fifteen minutes to apply. Differences in the representation of science are reported between the British and Bulgarian young elite, between the elite and the public in Bulgaria, between natural and social science students, and between beginners and advanced students in Britain. The use of these measures will extend the scope of science indicator measures used by the European Commission and the National Science Foundation, help the assessment of the socialization in university training, and may even contribute to the peace process in the “science wars.”

[1]  L. Wolpert,et al.  The Unnatural Nature of Science , 1993, The Lancet.

[2]  David J. Bartholomew,et al.  The Statistical Approach to Social Measurement , 1996 .

[3]  Martin W. Bauer,et al.  EUROPEAN PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF SCIENCE , 1994 .

[4]  C. O'muircheartaigh,et al.  Measuring scientific interest: the effect of knowledge questions on interest ratings , 1993 .

[5]  J. Durant,et al.  The public understanding of science , 1989, Nature.

[6]  J. Durant,et al.  The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain , 1995 .

[7]  Jiansheng Zhang,et al.  A survey of public scientific literacy in China , 1993 .

[8]  Stephen Cole,et al.  Social Stratification in Science , 1974 .

[9]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Questions and answers in attitude surveys , 1982 .

[10]  Barney G. Glaser,et al.  Organizational Scientists: Their Professional Careers , 1964 .

[11]  Hauptbannführer K. W. Heinrich Hartmann.  Jugend und Technik , 1944 .

[12]  D. Price,et al.  Collaboration in an invisible college. , 1966, The American psychologist.

[13]  Jon D. Miller.  The measurement of civic scientific literacy , 1998 .

[14]  Stephen B. Withey,et al.  Public Opinion about Science and Scientists , 1959 .

[15]  E. Einsiedel,et al.  MENTAL MAPS OF SCIENCE: KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES AMONG CANADIAN ADULTS , 1994 .

[16]  D. Price.  Money and Influence: The Links of Science to Public Policy. , 1974 .

[17]  B. Wynne,et al.  Misunderstanding science? : the public reconstruction of science and technology , 1996 .

[18]  Niklas Luhmann,et al.  Die Wissenschaft Der Gesellschaft , 1992 .

[19]  C. Midden,et al.  Cognitive Structures in the Perception of Modern Technologies , 1990 .

[20]  M. Bauer,et al.  Mapping variety in public understanding of science , 1993 .

[21]  Fredrica Rudell,et al.  THE POLLS—A ReviewAN EVALUATION OF “PUBLIC ATTITUDES TOWARD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY” IN SCIENCE INDICATORS: THE 1985 REPORT , 1988 .

[22]  M. Bauer.  Socio-demographic correlates of DK-responses in knowledge surveys: self-attributed ignorance of science , 1996 .

[23]  H. Echols.  Scientific Community , 1972, Nature.