PURPOSE
The Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS™) is an algorithm that can be used to classify lung nodules in patients with significant smoking histories. It is published in table format but can be implemented as a computer program. The aim of this study was to assess the efficiency and accuracy of the use of a computer program versus the table in categorizing lung nodules.
METHODS
The Lung-RADS algorithm was implemented as a computer program. Through the use of a survey tool, respondents were asked to categorize 13 simulated lung nodules using the computer program and the Lung-RADS table as published. Data were gathered regarding time to completion, accuracy of each nodule's categorization, users' subjective categorization confidence, and users' perceived efficiency using each method.
RESULTS
The use of a computer program to categorize lung nodules resulted in significantly increased interpretation speed (80.8 ± 37.7 vs 156 ± 105 seconds, P < .0001), lung nodule classification accuracy (99.6% vs 76.5%, P < .0001), and perceived confidence and efficiency compared with the use of the table. There were no significant differences in accuracy when comparing thoracic radiologists with the remainder of the group.
CONCLUSIONS
Radiologists were both more efficient and more accurate in lung nodule categorization when using computerized decision support tools. The authors propose that other institutions use computerized implementations of Lung-RADS in the interests of both efficiency and patient outcomes through proper management. Furthermore, they suggest the ACR design future iterations of the Lung-RADS algorithm with computerized decision support in mind.
[1]
Matthew B Morgan,et al.
Just-in-time radiologist decision support: the importance of PACS-integrated workflow.
,
2011,
Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.
[2]
J Raymond Geis,et al.
IT infrastructure in the era of imaging 3.0.
,
2014,
Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.
[3]
M. Roizen.
Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening
,
2012
.
[4]
S. Lam,et al.
Probability of cancer in pulmonary nodules detected on first screening CT.
,
2013,
The New England journal of medicine.
[5]
Keith J Dreyer,et al.
The imaging 3.0 informatics scorecard.
,
2015,
Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.
[6]
Michael F. McNeeley,et al.
Design and implementation of handheld and desktop software for the structured reporting of hepatic masses using the LI-RADS schema.
,
2014,
Academic radiology.
[7]
O. Miettinen,et al.
CT screening for lung cancer: frequency and significance of part-solid and nonsolid nodules.
,
2002,
AJR. American journal of roentgenology.