Use of sensory science as a practical commercial tool in the development of consumer-led processed meat products.

Abstract: This chapter explores the use of sensory science as a practical commercial tool in the development of consumer-led processed meat products. Consequently, the evolution of sensory-based methodologies and approaches used for processed meat product development (including in/out or pass/fail procedure; ratings for degree of difference from a standard; weighting of differences from control; descriptive analysis and flash profiling) is discussed, as well as the use of sensory-based instrumental methods. We also discuss the future opportunities for consumer sensory-based quality control, with an emphasis on the comprehensive holistic approach. This includes the integration of sensory and consumer methods across the processed meat production chain of development, which utilise advanced multivariate data analytical methodologies. Finally case studies are presented which describe how holistic sensory and consumer methods have been used for commercial product optimisation and development.

[1]  D. V. Byrne,et al.  Sensory based quality control utilising an electronic nose and GC-MS analyses to predict end-product quality from raw materials. , 2005, Meat science.

[2]  D. V. Byrne,et al.  Does the Mind Reflect the Mouth? Sensory Profiling and the Future , 2005, Critical reviews in food science and nutrition.

[3]  L. Skibsted,et al.  Warmed-over flavour in cooked sliced beef Chemical analysis in relation to sensory evaluation , 1992 .

[4]  Alejandra M Muñoz,et al.  Sensory évaluation in quality control: an overview, new developments and future opportunities , 2002 .

[5]  E. Köster The psychology of food choice: some often encountered fallacies , 2003 .

[6]  D. R. Peryam,et al.  Hedonic scale method of measuring food preferences. , 1957 .

[7]  M. C. Lanari,et al.  A review of dietary vitamin E supplementation for improvement of beef quality. , 1995, Journal of animal science.

[8]  Maurice G. O'Sullivan,et al.  A comparison of warmed-over flavour in pork by sensory analysis, GC/MS and the electronic nose. , 2003, Meat science.

[9]  Herbert Stone,et al.  Sensory Evaluation Practices , 1985 .

[10]  J. Delarue,et al.  Sensory mapping using Flash profile. Comparison with a conventional descriptive method for the evaluation of the flavour of fruit dairy products , 2004 .

[11]  R. Marino,et al.  New strategies for reducing the pork back-fat content in typical Italian salami. , 2009, Meat science.

[12]  J. Berdagué,et al.  Effects of starter cultures on the formation of flavour compounds in dry sausage. , 1993, Meat science.

[13]  Edgar Chambers,et al.  Statistical Designs and Panel Training/Experience for Sensory Analysis , 1981 .

[14]  D. V. Byrne,et al.  Descriptive sensory profiling and physical/chemical analyses of warmed-over flavour in pork patties from carriers and non-carriers of the RN(-) allele. , 2003, Meat science.

[15]  H. P. Dupuy,et al.  Chemical and sensory studies of antioxidant-treated beef , 1990 .

[16]  Morten Meilgaard,et al.  Sensory Evaluation Techniques , 2020 .

[17]  H. Macfie,et al.  DESIGNS TO BALANCE THE EFFECT OF ORDER OF PRESENTATION AND FIRST-ORDER CARRY-OVER EFFECTS IN HALL TESTS , 1989 .

[18]  P. Chinachoti Water mobility and its relation to functionality of sucrose-containing food systems , 1993 .

[19]  E. Chambers,et al.  Relating sensory measurements to consumer acceptance of meat products , 1993 .

[20]  G. Bertelsen,et al.  Effects of heat treatment on warmed-over flavour in ground beef during aerobic chill storage , 1993 .

[21]  Carolyn F. Ross,et al.  Sensory science at the human–machine interface , 2009 .

[22]  G. Grigioni,et al.  Warmed-over flavour analysis in low temperature-long time processed meat by an "electronic nose". , 2000, Meat science.

[23]  J. Swan,et al.  Effects of chopping time, meat source and storage temperature on the colour of New Zealand type fresh beef sausages. , 1998, Meat science.

[24]  J. M. Martin,et al.  Relationships between sensory descriptors, consumer acceptability and volatile flavor compounds of American dry-cured ham. , 2008, Meat science.

[25]  Christopher Lettl,et al.  User-oriented innovation in the food sector: Relevant streams of research and an agenda for future work , 2008 .

[26]  D. Cornforth,et al.  Consumer preferences for beef color and packaging did not affect eating satisfaction. , 2001, Meat science.

[27]  Barbara Siegmund,et al.  Changes of the volatile fraction of cooked chicken meat during chill storing: results obtained by the electronic nose in comparison to GC-MS and GC olfactometry , 1999 .

[28]  D. V. Byrne,et al.  Application of an electronic nose for measurements of boar taint in entire male pigs. , 2006, Meat science.

[29]  J. Kerry,et al.  Investigation of the effects of commercial carcass suspension (24 and 48 h) on meat quality in high oxygen modified atmosphere packed beef steaks during chill storage. , 2010 .

[30]  N. H. Mermelstein,et al.  Searching for sensory research excellence , 1996 .

[31]  D. V. Byrne,et al.  Sensory and chemical investigations on the effect of oven cooking on warmed-over flavour development in chicken meat. , 2002, Meat science.

[32]  H. J. Andersen,et al.  Monitoring of warmed-over flavour in pork using the electronic nose - correlation to sensory attributes and secondary lipid oxidation products. , 2008, Meat science.

[33]  R. Lawrie Meat: Current developments and future status. , 1977, Meat science.

[34]  T. A. Roberts,et al.  Beef quality assessed at European research centres. , 1984, Meat science.

[35]  Gail Vance Civille,et al.  A Standardized Lexicon of Meat WOF Descriptors , 1986 .

[36]  R. Singleton,et al.  Sensory Evaluation by Quantitative Descriptive Analysis , 2008 .

[37]  B. G. Lyon Development of Chicken Flavor Descriptive Attribute Terms Aided by Multivariate Statistical Procedures , 1987 .

[38]  Victoire Dairou,et al.  A Comparison of 14 Jams Characterized by Conventional Profile and a Quick Original Method, the Flash Profile , 2002 .

[39]  D. V. Byrne,et al.  Evaluation of pork colour: prediction of visual sensory quality of meat from instrumental and computer vision methods of colour analysis. , 2003, Meat science.

[40]  H. Cross,et al.  CONSUMER EVALUATION OF RESTRUCTURED BEEF STEAKS , 1976 .

[41]  D. V. Byrne,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF A SENSORY VOCABULARY FOR WARMED‐OVER FLAVOR: PART I. IN PORCINE MEAT , 1999 .

[42]  H. Kosaka,et al.  Antimutagenic activity of isoflavone from Pueraria lobata. , 2001, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[43]  Conor M. Delahunty,et al.  Sensory characterisation of cooked hams by untrained consumers using free-choice profiling , 1997 .

[44]  D. V. Byrne,et al.  The impact of sensory quality of pork on consumer preference. , 2007, Meat science.

[45]  Elvira Costell,et al.  A comparison of sensory methods in quality control , 2002 .

[46]  C. J. Findlay,et al.  Computers and the Internet in sensory quality control , 2002 .

[47]  A. M. Spanier,et al.  Changes in the content of lipid autoxidation and sulfur-containing compounds in cooked beef during storage , 1991 .

[48]  Emilía Martinsdóttir,et al.  Rapid Gas Sensor Measurements To Determine Spoilage of Capelin (Mallotus villosus) , 1997 .

[49]  Barbara J. Stewart-Knox,et al.  What separates the winners from the losers in new food product development , 2003 .

[50]  H. Rock,et al.  EFFECT OF ADDED SODIUM NITRITE AND SODIUM NITRATE ON SENSORY QUALITY AND NITROSAMINE FORMATION IN THURINGER SAUSAGE , 1975 .

[51]  Derek V. Byrne,et al.  Power of experimental designs, estimated by Monte Carlo simulation , 2000 .

[52]  R. Desrochers,et al.  Expanding the sensitivity of conventional analytical techniques in quality control using sensory technology , 2002 .

[53]  Garmt Dijksterhuis,et al.  Multivariate data analysis in sensory and consumer science: An overview of developments , 1995 .

[54]  J. Berdagué,et al.  Biochemical activities of Micrococcaceae and their effects on the aromatic profiles and odours of a dry sausage model , 1996 .

[55]  Per B. Brockhoff,et al.  Subtle differences in milk: comparison of an analytical and an affective test , 2003 .

[56]  A. Resurreccion,et al.  Sensory aspects of consumer choices for meat and meat products. , 2004, Meat science.

[57]  Marianne Gillette,et al.  The Sensory Quality System: a global quality control solution , 2002 .

[58]  Ingemar Lundström,et al.  Monitoring sausage fermentation using an electronic nose , 1998 .

[59]  E. Chambers,et al.  Consumer perception of sensory qualities in muscle foods , 1993 .

[60]  Suzanne Pecore,et al.  A consumer-focused QC/sensory program in the food industry , 2002 .

[61]  D. V. Byrne,et al.  Perceptual masking of boar taint in Swedish fermented sausages. , 2009, Meat science.

[62]  J E Haugen,et al.  Electronic nose and artificial neural network. , 1998, Meat science.

[63]  D. Troy,et al.  The Effects of Tapioca Starch, Oat Fibre and Whey Protein on the Physical and Sensory Properties of Low-fat Beef Burgers , 1998 .

[64]  Robert P. W. Duin,et al.  FUZZY SET THEORY APPLIED TO PRODUCT CLASSIFICATION BY A SENSORY PANEL , 1989 .

[65]  J. Mourot,et al.  Effect of a linseed diet on lipid composition, lipid peroxidation and consumer evaluation of French fresh and cooked pork meats. , 2009, Meat science.

[66]  D. V. Byrne,et al.  Sensory and chemical assessment of pork supplemented with iron and vitamin E. , 2003, Meat science.

[67]  H. Buchtová,et al.  Chemical, instrumental and sensory characteristics of cooked pork ham. , 2007, Meat science.

[68]  D. V. Byrne,et al.  Sensory and chemical analysis of cooked porcine meat patties in relation to warmed-over flavour and pre-slaughter stress. , 2001, Meat science.

[69]  D. V. Byrne,et al.  Sensory panel consistency during development of a vocabulary for warmed-over flavour , 2001 .

[70]  J. N Weller,et al.  The establishment and use of a QC analytical/ descriptive/ consumer measurement model for the routine evaluation of products at manufacturing facilities , 2002 .