Fully Automatic System for Accurate Localisation and Analysis of Cephalometric Landmarks in Lateral Cephalograms

Cephalometric tracing is a standard analysis tool for orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a fully automatic landmark annotation (FALA) system for finding cephalometric landmarks in lateral cephalograms and its application to the classification of skeletal malformations. Digital cephalograms of 400 subjects (age range: 7–76 years) were available. All cephalograms had been manually traced by two experienced orthodontists with 19 cephalometric landmarks, and eight clinical parameters had been calculated for each subject. A FALA system to locate the 19 landmarks in lateral cephalograms was developed. The system was evaluated via comparison to the manual tracings, and the automatically located landmarks were used for classification of the clinical parameters. The system achieved an average point-to-point error of 1.2 mm, and 84.7% of landmarks were located within the clinically accepted precision range of 2.0 mm. The automatic landmark localisation performance was within the inter-observer variability between two clinical experts. The automatic classification achieved an average classification accuracy of 83.4% which was comparable to an experienced orthodontist. The FALA system rapidly and accurately locates and analyses cephalometric landmarks in lateral cephalograms, and has the potential to significantly improve the clinical work flow in orthodontic treatment.

[1]  John K. Tsotsos,et al.  Knowledge-based landmarking of cephalograms. , 1986, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[2]  Sheldon Baumrind,et al.  The reliability of head film measurements , 1971 .

[3]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active Shape Models-Their Training and Application , 1995, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[4]  Y. Kim,et al.  Anteroposterior dysplasia indicator: an adjunct to cephalometric differential diagnosis. , 1978, American journal of orthodontics.

[5]  C. Steiner.  Cephalometrics for you and me , 1953 .

[6]  Guoyan Zheng,et al.  Fully-Automatic Landmark detection in Skull X-Ray images , 2014 .

[7]  R S Nanda,et al.  Cephalometric study of the dentofacial complex of North Indians. , 1969, The Angle orthodontist.

[8]  K. N. Dollman,et al.  - 1 , 1743 .

[9]  Y. Kim,et al.  Overbite depth indicator with particular reference to anterior open-bite. , 1974, American journal of orthodontics.

[10]  W. Downs,et al.  Variations in facial relationships; their significance in treatment and prognosis. , 1948, American journal of orthodontics.

[11]  Paul A. Viola,et al.  Rapid object detection using a boosted cascade of simple features , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2001.

[12]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[13]  Stephen A. Schendel,et al.  Introduction to Radiographic Cephalometry , 1986 .

[14]  C H TWEED,et al.  The Frankfort-mandibular plane angle in orthodontic diagnosis, classification, treatment planning, and prognosis. , 1946, American journal of orthodontics and oral surgery.

[15]  Thomas G. Dietterich.  What is machine learning? , 2020, Archives of Disease in Childhood.

[16]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  A benchmark for comparison of dental radiography analysis algorithms , 2016, Medical Image Anal..

[17]  Juergen Gall,et al.  Class-specific Hough forests for object detection , 2009, 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[18]  Guoyan Zheng,et al.  Fully Automatic Cephalometric X-Ray Landmark Detection Using Random Forest Regression and Sparse shape composition , 2014 .

[19]  Mariano Alcañiz Raya,et al.  Automatic Localization of Cephalometric Landmarks , 2001, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[20]  Paul A. Bromiley,et al.  Robust and Accurate Shape Model Matching Using Random Forest Regression-Voting , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[21]  Michel Desvignes,et al.  First steps toward automatic location of landmarks on X-ray images , 2000, Proceedings 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. ICPR-2000.

[22]  Saeed Sadri,et al.  Discrimination of Bony Structures in Cephalograms for Automatic Landmark Detection , 2008, CSICC.

[23]  Majid Ahmadi,et al.  Automatic Identification and Localization of Craniofacial Landmarks Using Multi Layer Neural Network , 2003, MICCAI.

[24]  J A McNamara,et al.  A method of cephalometric evaluation. , 1984, American journal of orthodontics.

[25]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Fully Automatic Segmentation of the Proximal Femur Using Random Forest Regression Voting , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[26]  C J Taylor,et al.  A blackboard architecture for automating cephalometric analysis. , 1991, Medical informatics = Medecine et informatique.

[27]  P Hammond,et al.  An evaluation of active shape models for the automatic identification of cephalometric landmarks. , 2000, European journal of orthodontics.

[28]  G. Hamarneh,et al.  Automatic Globally-Optimal Pictorial Structures with Random Decision Forest Based Likelihoods For Cephalometric X-Ray Landmark Detection , 2014 .

[29]  Bulat Ibragimov,et al.  Computerized Cephalometry by Game Theory with Shape-and Appearance-Based Landmark Refinement , 2016 .

[30]  Bulat Ibragimov.  Automatic Cephalometric X-Ray Landmark Detection by Applying Game Theory and Random Forests , 2014 .

[31]  S Baumrind,et al.  The reliability of head film measurements. 1. Landmark identification. , 1971, American journal of orthodontics.

[32]  Robert W. Lucky,et al.  The Grand Challenge , 1993 .

[33]  Reinhilde Jacobs,et al.  Cephalometric landmark variability among orthodontists and dentomaxillofacial radiologists: a comparative study , 2015, Imaging science in dentistry.

[34]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Fully Automatic Cephalometric Evaluation using Random Forest Regression-Voting , 2015, ISBI 2015.

[35]  D N Davis,et al.  Assessment of an automated cephalometric analysis system. , 1996, European journal of orthodontics.

[36]  Chengwen Chu,et al.  Evaluation and Comparison of Anatomical Landmark Detection Methods for Cephalometric X-Ray Images: A Grand Challenge , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[37]  Evon M. O. Abu-Taieh,et al.  Comparative Study , 2020, Definitions.