Contemporary laparoscopic and open radical retropubic prostatectomy: pathologic outcomes and Kattan postoperative nomograms are equivalent.

[1]  M. Kattan,et al.  Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[2]  M. Kattan,et al.  Preoperative nomogram predicting the 10-year probability of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[3]  M. Kattan,et al.  Prognostic impact of positive surgical margins in surgically treated prostate cancer: multi-institutional assessment of 5831 patients. , 2005, Urology.

[4]  Michael W Kattan,et al.  Postoperative nomogram predicting the 10-year probability of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  P. Schellhammer,et al.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: evaluation of specimen pathologic features to critically assess and modify surgical technique. , 2005, Urology.

[6]  D. Teber,et al.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Heilbronn technique: oncological results in the first 500 patients. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[7]  R. Rabenalt,et al.  Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: oncological and functional results after 700 procedures. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[8]  M. Cooperberg,et al.  Prostate cancer 2004: insights from national disease registries. , 2004, Oncology.

[9]  I. Derweesh,et al.  Continuing trends in pathological stage migration in radical prostatectomy specimens. , 2004, Urologic oncology.

[10]  Kirsten L. Greene,et al.  Validation of the Kattan preoperative nomogram for prostate cancer recurrence using a community based cohort: results from cancer of the prostate strategic urological research endeavor (capsure). , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[11]  L. Gomella,et al.  Pathologic comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens. , 2003, Urology.

[12]  Dogu Teber,et al.  Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. , 2003, The Journal of urology.

[13]  Ashutosh Tewari,et al.  Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted anatomic prostatectomy: the Vattikuti Urology Institute experience. , 2002, Urology.

[14]  Ashutosh Tewari,et al.  Technique of da Vinci robot-assisted anatomic radical prostatectomy. , 2002, Urology.

[15]  Sam S. Chang,et al.  Pathological parameters of radical prostatectomy for clinical stages T1c versus T2 prostate adenocarcinoma: decreased pathological stage and increased detection of transition zone tumors. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[16]  Michael W Kattan,et al.  Cancer control with radical prostatectomy alone in 1,000 consecutive patients. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[17]  A. Partin,et al.  Long-term biochemical disease-free and cancer-specific survival following anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. The 15-year Johns Hopkins experience. , 2001, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[18]  B. Guillonneau,et al.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris technique. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[19]  B. Guillonneau,et al.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris experience. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[20]  M. Kattan,et al.  Postoperative nomogram for disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  W. Catalona,et al.  Cancer recurrence and survival rates after anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer: intermediate-term results. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[22]  M. Soloway,et al.  Incidence, etiology, location, prevention and treatment of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[23]  L R Kavoussi,et al.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short-term experience. , 1997, Urology.

[24]  D. Bostwick,et al.  Anatomic site-specific positive margins in organ-confined prostate cancer and its impact on outcome after radical prostatectomy. , 1997, Urology.

[25]  M. Kattan,et al.  Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. , 1995, The Journal of urology.

[26]  D. Henson,et al.  Practice protocol for the examination of specimens removed from patients with carcinoma of the prostate gland. A publication of the cancer committee, college of american pathologists. Task Force on the Examination of Specimens Removed From Patients With Prostate Cancer. , 1994, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.