Multi-objective decision-making methods for optimising CO2 decisions in the automotive industry

Abstract Multi-objective optimisation (MOOP) methods are used heavily to support decision-makers in addressing problems with conflicting objectives. With global CO2 emission legislation becoming stringent, automotive OEMs face a challenge to balance conflicting commercial and environmental objectives simultaneously. Automotive OEMs seek to maximise profits by stimulating global sales volumes whilst also minimising CO2 management costs. MOOP methods can quantify CO2 management costs to optimise decisions in response to the increasingly regulated business environment. Whilst automotive OEMs are modelling the dynamic knock-on effects of pursuing multiple objectives, there is also a need to formulate their decision objectives, decision criteria and decision options to be considered as part of CO2 management decisions first. A systematic literature review offers a detailed account of how automotive OEMs can optimise CO2 management decisions. The multiple decision objectives, decision criteria and CO2 management decision options considered by automotive OEMs are first categorised. The systematic literature review reveals that evaluating decision criteria such as the vehicle fleet portfolio, customer demand, market requirements and financial cost can assist automotive OEMs select the optimal CO2 management decision in a given scenario. Next, reconfiguring vehicle features, investing in technology, restricting sales and paying CO2 tariffs are identified as the most common CO2 management decisions taken by automotive OEMs. Then MOOP methods are critiqued for their suitability, before a novel decision support model, which adopts an automotive OEMs’ perspective for mitigating CO2 management costs is proposed. It is found that interactive and objective decision making approaches such as MOOP opposed to classical Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods can more precisely quantify the commercial implications of the stricter global CO2 emission legislation now imposed on automotive OEMs. If automotive OEMs adopt the proposed model, they can effectively model future CO2 management scenarios and pre-emptively prevent counter-productive decisions by minimising CO2 management costs.

[1]  F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi,et al.  Extension of TOPSIS for decision-making problems with interval data: Interval efficiency , 2009, Math. Comput. Model..

[2]  S. Zionts,et al.  An Interactive Multiple Objective Linear Programming Method for a Class of Underlying Nonlinear Utility Functions , 1983 .

[3]  Peter Erskine Wells,et al.  The Automotive Industry in an Era of Eco-Austerity: Creating an Industry As If the Planet Mattered , 2010 .

[4]  Zheng Wan,et al.  China’s electric car frustrations , 2015 .

[5]  Lay Eng Teoh,et al.  A bi-objective dynamic programming approach for airline green fleet planning , 2014 .

[6]  Chih-Hao Yang,et al.  An optimization portfolio decision model of life cycle activity-based costing with carbon footprint constraints for hybrid green power strategies , 2018, Comput. Oper. Res..

[7]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Carbon footprint of global passenger cars: Scenarios through 2050 , 2016 .

[8]  R. Söderberg,et al.  Taxation and Transparency: How Policy Decisions Impact Product Quality and Sustainability , 2015 .

[9]  M. M. Noor,et al.  International regulation of vehicle emissions control rules and its influence on academic engine development experimental study and vehicle manufacturing , 2019, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering.

[10]  Thomas Spengler,et al.  The influence of emission thresholds and retrofit options on airline fleet planning: An optimization approach , 2018 .

[11]  Bernard Roy,et al.  Aide multicritère à la décision : méthodes et cas , 1993 .

[12]  Biagio Ciuffo,et al.  Comparative Evaluation of the Effect of Various Technologies on Light-duty Vehicle CO2 Emissions over NEDC and WLTP☆ , 2016 .

[13]  Mohammed A. Omar,et al.  Life cycle assessment-based selection for a sustainable lightweight body-in-white design , 2012 .

[14]  Richard Burke,et al.  A novel use of multivariate statistics to diagnose test-to-test variation in complex measurement systems , 2018 .

[15]  Shengxiang Yang,et al.  Evolutionary dynamic optimization: A survey of the state of the art , 2012, Swarm Evol. Comput..

[16]  Ling Xu,et al.  Evaluation of sustainable acid rain control options utilizing a fuzzy TOPSIS multi-criteria decision analysis model frame work , 2017 .

[17]  Anibal T. de Almeida,et al.  Impact of the electricity mix and use profile in the life-cycle assessment of electric vehicles , 2013 .

[18]  Biagio Ciuffo,et al.  Fuel consumption and CO2 emissions of passenger cars over the New Worldwide Harmonized Test Protocol , 2016 .

[19]  Masato Inoue,et al.  Disassembly system modeling and design with parts selection for cost, recycling and CO2 saving rates using multi criteria optimization , 2016 .

[20]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Multi-objective Optimisation Using Evolutionary Algorithms: An Introduction , 2011, Multi-objective Evolutionary Optimisation for Product Design and Manufacturing.

[21]  Morteza Saberi,et al.  Are MCDM methods useful? A critical review of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Analytic Network Process (ANP) , 2019, Cogent Engineering.

[22]  Yong Chen,et al.  Analytic network process: Academic insights and perspectives analysis , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[23]  Valentina Ferretti,et al.  From stakeholders analysis to cognitive mapping and Multi-Attribute Value Theory: An integrated approach for policy support , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[24]  Kannan Govindan,et al.  ELECTRE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[25]  Hassan Monsef,et al.  Comparison of evolutionary multi objective optimization algorithms in optimum design of water distribution network , 2019, Ain Shams Engineering Journal.

[26]  María Teresa Lamata,et al.  On rank reversal and TOPSIS method , 2012, Math. Comput. Model..

[27]  E. David Ford,et al.  Informed multi-objective decision-making in environmental management using Pareto optimality , 2007 .

[28]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  A Pareto Approach to Aligning Public and Private Objectives in Vehicle Design , 2008, DAC 2008.

[29]  Francisco Guijarro,et al.  Measuring the social responsibility of European companies: a goal programming approach , 2019, Int. Trans. Oper. Res..

[30]  Reza Baradaran Kazemzadeh,et al.  PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[31]  Mathew Werber,et al.  Batteries: Lower cost than gasoline? , 2009 .

[32]  Erwin Schmid,et al.  Cost and well-to-wheel implications of the vehicle fleet CO2 emission regulation in the European Union , 2014 .

[33]  Stephen Russell.  Estimating and Reporting the Comparative Emissions Impacts of Products , 2019 .

[34]  Jing Yan,et al.  Best available techniques assessment for coal gasification to promote cleaner production based on the ELECTRE-II method , 2016 .

[35]  Bo Hu,et al.  Progress and recent trends in 48 V hybridisation and e-boosting technology on passenger vehicles – a review , 2018 .

[36]  Thomas H. Bradley,et al.  Analysis of corporate average fuel economy regulation compliance scenarios inclusive of plug in hybrid vehicles , 2014 .

[37]  Matthias Ehrgott,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys , 2005 .

[38]  Essam Shehab,et al.  Detailed cost estimating in the automotive industry: Data and information requirements , 2011 .

[39]  Luis C. Dias,et al.  Simple procedures of choice in multicriteria problems without precise information about the alternatives' values , 2010, Comput. Oper. Res..

[40]  Pantelis Capros,et al.  The role of carbon standards on passenger cars towards the reduction of GHG emissions in EU: A model-based scenario analysis , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Electric Vehicle Conference (IEVC).

[41]  Jorge M. Montagna,et al.  Goal programming application for the decision support in the daily production planning of sawmills , 2019, Forest Policy and Economics.

[42]  Dean Tomazic,et al.  Impact of the Future Fuel Economy Targets on Powertrain, Driveline and Vehicle NVH Development , 2017 .

[43]  Biagio Ciuffo,et al.  A simulation-based methodology for quantifying European passenger car fleet CO2 emissions , 2017 .

[44]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications , 1992, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[45]  J. P. King,et al.  Statistical and analytical comparison of multi-criteria decision-making techniques under fuzzy environment , 2016 .

[46]  Cinzia Colapinto,et al.  Multi-criteria decision analysis with goal programming in engineering, management and social sciences: a state-of-the art review , 2015, Annals of Operations Research.

[47]  Guzay Pasaoglu,et al.  Potential vehicle fleet CO2 reductions and cost implications for various vehicle technology deployment scenarios in Europe , 2012 .

[48]  Ramaiyan Velmurugan,et al.  The analytic network process for the pharmaceutical sector: Multi criteria decision making to select the suitable method for the preparation of nanoparticles , 2012, DARU Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences.

[49]  Frank Figge,et al.  Opportunity cost based analysis of corporate eco-efficiency: a methodology and its application to the CO2-efficiency of German companies. , 2010, Journal of environmental management.

[50]  Adam M Boies,et al.  How Well Do We Know the Future of CO2 Emissions? Projecting Fleet Emissions from Light Duty Vehicle Technology Drivers. , 2017, Environmental science & technology.

[51]  D. Rosenfeld,et al.  Comparison of advanced fuels—Which technology can win from the life cycle perspective? , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[52]  B. Roy.  THE OUTRANKING APPROACH AND THE FOUNDATIONS OF ELECTRE METHODS , 1991 .

[53]  Pascal Da Costa,et al.  Is Electric Vehicles Battery Recovery a Source of Cost or Profit , 2017 .

[54]  K. Narayana Rao,et al.  Multi-objective optimization approach for cost management during product design at the conceptual phase , 2014 .

[55]  Jillian Anable,et al.  Modeling the uptake of plug-in vehicles in a heterogeneous car market using a consumer segmentation approach , 2017 .

[56]  Wen-Hsien Tsai,et al.  Integrating information about the cost of carbon through activity-based costing , 2012 .

[57]  Evangelos Triantaphyllou,et al.  An examination of the effectiveness of multi-dimensional decision-making methods: A decision-making paradox , 1989, Decis. Support Syst..

[58]  Jicheng Liu,et al.  A VIKOR-based approach for assessing the service performance of electric vehicle sharing programs: A case study in Beijing , 2017 .

[59]  Fuquan Zhao,et al.  Comparative Study on Life Cycle CO2 Emissions from the Production of Electric and Conventional Vehicles in China , 2017 .

[60]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  Optimal Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicle Design and Allocation for Minimum Life Cycle Cost, Petroleum Consumption, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions , 2010 .

[61]  Bryan Maybee,et al.  Climate Policy Uncertainty and Power Generation Investments: A Real Options-CVaR Portfolio Optimization Approach☆ , 2015 .

[62]  Biagio Ciuffo,et al.  The development and validation of a vehicle simulator for the introduction of Worldwide Harmonized test protocol in the European light duty vehicle CO2 certification process , 2018, Applied Energy.

[63]  Jayanath Ananda,et al.  A critical review of multi-criteria decision making methods with special reference to forest management and planning , 2009 .

[64]  Ali Mohaghar,et al.  An integrated group decision-making process for supplier selection and order allocation using multi-attribute utility theory and linear programming , 2008, J. Frankl. Inst..

[65]  Jagadish,et al.  Selection of Material for Optimal Design Using Multi-criteria Decision Making , 2014 .

[66]  Yannis Siskos,et al.  Intelligent multicriteria decision support: Overview and perspectives , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[67]  Peter Reichert,et al.  Identifying non-additive multi-attribute value functions based on uncertain indifference statements , 2019, Omega.

[68]  A. Nassehi,et al.  Balancing global customer needs and profitability using a novel business model for new model programmes in the automotive industry , 2016 .

[69]  Lisa Scholten,et al.  Tackling uncertainty in multi-criteria decision analysis - An application to water supply infrastructure planning , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[70]  Efthimios Zervas,et al.  Critique of the regulatory limitations of exhaust CO2 emissions from passenger cars in European union , 2011 .

[71]  C. Thiel,et al.  Cost and CO2 Aspects of Future Vehicle Options in Europe under New Energy Policy Scenarios , 2010 .

[72]  Mikiya Araki,et al.  Impact of powertrain electrification, vehicle size reduction and lightweight materials substitution on energy use, CO2 emissions and cost of a passenger light-duty vehicle fleet , 2015 .

[73]  E. Rubin,et al.  The cost of CO2 capture and storage , 2015 .

[74]  Roland Goetgeluk,et al.  The Measurement and Analysis of Housing Preference and Choice , 2011 .

[75]  Dylan Jones,et al.  Advances and New Orientations in Goal Programming , 2019, Multiple Criteria Decision Making.

[76]  Matthias Ehrgott,et al.  Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis , 2016 .

[77]  Valentinas Podvezko,et al.  The Recalculation of the Weights of Criteria in MCDM Methods Using the Bayes Approach , 2018, Symmetry.

[78]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  A review of multi-criteria decision-making applications to solve energy management problems: Two decades from 1995 to 2015 , 2017 .

[79]  S. Jalilov.  Value of Clean Water Resources: Estimating the Water Quality Improvement in Metro Manila, Philippines , 2017 .

[80]  Volker H. Hoffmann,et al.  Strategizing in an Unpredictable Climate: Exploring Corporate Strategies to Cope with Regulatory Uncertainty , 2011 .

[81]  Richard Folkson,et al.  Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicle Technologies for Improved Environmental Performance , 2014 .

[82]  C. B. E. Costa,et al.  MACBETH — An Interactive Path Towards the Construction of Cardinal Value Functions , 1994 .

[83]  Qingfu Zhang,et al.  Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: A survey of the state of the art , 2011, Swarm Evol. Comput..

[84]  Ian N. Durbach,et al.  Modeling uncertainty in multi-criteria decision analysis , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[85]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  Alternative Fuel Vehicle Adoption Increases Fleet Gasoline Consumption and Greenhouse Gas Emissions under United States Corporate Average Fuel Economy Policy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[86]  Kerry Kirwan,et al.  A comprehensive framework for automotive sustainability assessment , 2016 .

[87]  Silva Carla,et al.  従来型ガソリン軽自動車の燃料消費と排出量を低減する”低コスト”戦略の解析とシミュレーション , 2009 .

[88]  Mehrdad Tamiz,et al.  Goal programming for decision making: An overview of the current state-of-the-art , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[89]  Xiaoshuan Zhang,et al.  Carbon Footprint Constrained Profit Maximization of Table Grapes Cold Chain , 2018, Agronomy.

[90]  B. Ciuffo,et al.  Models and scientific tools for regulatory purposes: The case of CO2 emissions from light duty vehicles in Europe , 2017 .

[91]  Xiuli Liu,et al.  Assessing the eco-efficiency of a circular economy system in China's coal mining areas: Emergy and data envelopment analysis , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[92]  R. W. Saaty,et al.  The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used , 1987 .

[93]  Sushil Kumar,et al.  Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[94]  John B. Heywood,et al.  The Trade-off between Automobile Acceleration Performance, Weight, and Fuel Consumption , 2008 .

[95]  Andreas Sumper,et al.  Pareto Optimal Reconfiguration of Power Distribution Systems Using a Genetic Algorithm Based on NSGA-II , 2013 .

[96]  E. Helmers,et al.  Fully electric and plug-in hybrid cars - An analysis of learning rates, user costs, and costs for mitigating CO2 and air pollutant emissions , 2019, Journal of cleaner production.

[97]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  A Study of Fuel Efficiency and Emission Policy Impact on Optimal Vehicle Design Decisions , 2004 .

[98]  Michele Germani,et al.  Design for Manufacturing and Assembly vs. Design to Cost: Toward a Multi-objective Approach for Decision-making Strategies During Conceptual Design of Complex Products , 2016 .

[99]  Chongfeng Ren,et al.  Integrated multi-objective stochastic fuzzy programming and AHP method for agricultural water and land optimization allocation under multiple uncertainties , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[100]  Zishuo Huang,et al.  A goal programming based model system for community energy plan , 2017 .

[101]  Jing J. Liang,et al.  A survey on multi-objective evolutionary algorithms for the solution of the environmental/economic dispatch problems , 2018, Swarm Evol. Comput..

[102]  A. Joshi,et al.  Review of Vehicle Engine Efficiency and Emissions , 2017, SAE Technical Paper Series.

[103]  Dylan Jones,et al.  An extended goal programming methodology for analysis of a network encompassing multiple objectives and stakeholders , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[104]  Alessio Ishizaka,et al.  Multi-criteria Decision Analysis: Methods and Software , 2013 .

[105]  Dirk Bosteels,et al.  An Assessment of Emissions from Light-Duty Vehicles using PEMS and Chassis Dynamometer Testing , 2014 .

[106]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  The Selection of Wagons for the Internal Transport of a Logistics Company: A Novel Approach Based on Rough BWM and Rough SAW Methods , 2017, Symmetry.

[107]  Johan Springael,et al.  PROMETHEE and AHP: The design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis.: Strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[108]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[109]  David J. Singer,et al.  Strategic life cycle decision-making for the management of complex Systems subject to uncertain environmental policy , 2013 .

[110]  Febri Haswan.  Application of Simple Additive Weighting Method to Determine Outstanding School Principals , 2019 .

[111]  Michele Germani,et al.  Life Cycle Model and Metrics in Shipbuilding: How to Use them in the Preliminary Design Phases , 2018 .

[112]  Marc Ross,et al.  Analysis and simulation of “low-cost” strategies to reduce fuel consumption and emissions in conventional gasoline light-duty vehicles , 2009 .

[113]  B. Talukder,et al.  The PROMETHEE Framework for Comparing the Sustainability of Agricultural Systems , 2018, Resources.

[114]  Juan Miguel Rodríguez López,et al.  Corporate investments and environmental regulation: The role of regulatory uncertainty, regulation-induced uncertainty, and investment history , 2017 .

[115]  C. Türe,et al.  An assessment of using Aluminum and Magnesium on CO2 emission in European passenger cars , 2020 .

[116]  W. Tsai,et al.  Carbon Emissions Cost Analysis with Activity-Based Costing , 2018, Sustainability.

[117]  Ning Ai,et al.  Sustainability assessment of universities as small-scale urban systems: A comparative analysis using Fisher Information and Data Envelopment Analysis , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[118]  Salvatore Greco,et al.  An Overview of ELECTRE Methods and their Recent Extensions , 2013 .

[119]  T. Stewart,et al.  A comparison of simplified value function approaches for treating uncertainty in multi-criteria decision analysis , 2012 .

[120]  P. Pavinato,et al.  Phosphate Sources and Their Placement Affecting Soil Phosphorus Pools in Sugarcane , 2018, Agronomy.

[121]  Saeed Reza Mohandes,et al.  Barriers to green roof installation: An integrated fuzzy-based MCDM approach , 2020 .

[122]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  Perceptual Attributes in Product Design: Fuel Economy and Silhouette-Based Perceived Environmental Friendliness Tradeoffs in Automotive Vehicle Design , 2012 .

[123]  Makena Coffman,et al.  Electric vehicles revisited: a review of factors that affect adoption , 2017 .

[124]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Optimal Estimation of Executive Compensation by Linear Programming , 1955 .

[125]  Konstantinos Aravossis,et al.  Decision making in renewable energy investments: A review , 2016 .

[126]  C. Zopounidis,et al.  Multi‐criteria decision aid in financial decision making: methodologies and literature review , 2002 .

[127]  Rameshwar Dubey,et al.  Supplier sustainability performance evaluation using the analytic network process , 2020 .

[128]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Multiattribute Utility Theory: Recent Accomplishments and What Lies Ahead , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[129]  Jonn Axsen,et al.  Picking Winners: Modelling the Costs of Technology-specific Climate Policy in the U.S. Passenger Vehicle Sector , 2017 .

[130]  Salvatore Greco,et al.  Multiple criteria sorting with a set of additive value functions , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[131]  Saad Mekhilef,et al.  A review on global fuel economy standards, labels and technologies in the transportation sector , 2011 .

[132]  Alessio Ishizaka,et al.  Selecting the best statistical distribution with PROMETHEE and GAIA , 2011, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[133]  Xiaohan Yu,et al.  PROMETHEE for prioritized criteria , 2019, Soft Computing.

[134]  İhsan Kaya,et al.  A comprehensive review of fuzzy multi criteria decision making methodologies for energy policy making , 2019, Energy Strategy Reviews.

[135]  Donald E. Grierson,et al.  Comparison among five evolutionary-based optimization algorithms , 2005, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[136]  Jean Pierre Brans,et al.  HOW TO SELECT AND HOW TO RANK PROJECTS: THE PROMETHEE METHOD , 1986 .

[137]  T. Saaty,et al.  Fundamentals of the analytic network process — Dependence and feedback in decision-making with a single network , 2004 .

[138]  Walid Matar,et al.  Striking a balance between profit and carbon dioxide emissions in the Saudi cement industry , 2017 .

[139]  Paulo Cortez,et al.  Modern Optimization with R , 2014, Use R!.

[140]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[141]  Aqueeb Sohail Shaik,et al.  Plant layout optimisation with implementation of technical cleanliness in an automotive industry: a system dynamics approach , 2018 .

[142]  Rafael Bernardo Carmona-Benítez,et al.  An Econometric Dynamic Model to estimate passenger demand for air transport industry , 2017 .

[143]  Nigel P. Brandon,et al.  Assessing and comparing German and UK transition policies for electric mobility , 2015 .

[144]  Zhiwu Li,et al.  Selection of take-back pattern of vehicle reverse logistics in China via Grey-DEMATEL and Fuzzy-VIKOR combined method , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[145]  Roland Seebacher.  Mission CO2 Reduction , 2016 .

[146]  Salvatore Greco,et al.  Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[147]  C. Bandera,et al.  Value analysis as a decision support tool in cruise ship design , 2010 .

[148]  H. Dyckhoff,et al.  Is data envelopment analysis a suitable tool for performance measurement and benchmarking in non-production contexts? , 2018, Business Research.

[149]  Richard Burke,et al.  Chassis Dynamometer Testing: Addressing the Challenges of New Global Legislation , 2017 .

[150]  H. Vandenbussche,et al.  Antidumping protection hurts exporters: firm-level evidence , 2013, Review of World Economics.

[151]  The Economics of Attribute-Based Regulation: Theory and Evidence from Fuel Economy Standards , 2017 .

[152]  Nicolas Gillis,et al.  UTA-poly and UTA-splines: Additive value functions with polynomial marginals , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[153]  Patrick T. Hester,et al.  An Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods , 2013 .

[154]  Juan Manuel Carrasco Solís,et al.  A New Fast Peak Current Controller for Transient Voltage Faults for Power Converters , 2015 .

[156]  Carlos A. Bana e Costa,et al.  Using MACBETH with the Choquet Integral Fundamentals to Model Interdependencies between Elementary Concerns in the Context of Risk Management , 2014, ICORES.

[157]  Shengchao Zhou,et al.  Integrated data envelopment analysis methods for measuring technical, environmental, and eco-efficiencies , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[158]  Haslenda Hashim,et al.  Modelling and optimization of CO2 abatement strategies , 2014 .

[159]  Michel Beuthe,et al.  Comparative analysis of UTA multicriteria methods , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[160]  Jin Si,et al.  Assessment of building-integrated green technologies: A review and case study on applications of Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) method , 2016 .

[161]  Ivan Arsie,et al.  Development and on-board testing of an ADAS-based methodology to enhance cruise control features towards CO2 reduction , 2017, 2017 5th IEEE International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems (MT-ITS).

[162]  Hyo Seon Park,et al.  Design model for analysis of relationships among CO2 emissions, cost, and structural parameters in green building construction with composite columns , 2016 .

[163]  Jaeil Park,et al.  Cost-effective concept development using functional modeling guidelines , 2019, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing.

[164]  Marc Nalbach,et al.  CO 2 Emissions Reduction via 48V Active Engine-Off Coasting , 2016 .

[165]  J. S. Spreen,et al.  Supporting analysis on real-world light-duty vehicle CO2-emissions , 2016 .

[166]  Morteza Yazdani,et al.  A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[167]  Paulo Augusto Cauchick Miguel,et al.  Review, analysis and classification of the literature on QFD—Types of research, difficulties and benefits , 2008 .

[168]  A. Kolios,et al.  A Comparative Study of Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Methods under Stochastic Inputs , 2016 .

[169]  P. Nieuwenhuis,et al.  Shipping or local production? CO2 impact of a strategic decision: An automotive industry case study , 2012 .

[170]  Wei Cai,et al.  A sustainability evaluation method integrating the energy, economic and environment in remanufacturing systems , 2019 .

[171]  Dmitry Podkopaev,et al.  Simple additive weighting - A metamodel for multiple criteria decision analysis methods , 2016, Expert Syst. Appl..