Mechanically unfolding the small, topologically simple protein L.

beta-sheet proteins are generally more able to resist mechanical deformation than alpha-helical proteins. Experiments measuring the mechanical resistance of beta-sheet proteins extended by their termini led to the hypothesis that parallel, directly hydrogen-bonded terminal beta-strands provide the greatest mechanical strength. Here we test this hypothesis by measuring the mechanical properties of protein L, a domain with a topology predicted to be mechanically strong, but with no known mechanical function. A pentamer of this small, topologically simple protein is resistant to mechanical deformation over a wide range of extension rates. Molecular dynamics simulations show the energy landscape for protein L is highly restricted for mechanical unfolding and that this protein unfolds by the shearing apart of two structural units in a mechanism similar to that proposed for ubiquitin, which belongs to the same structural class as protein L, but unfolds at a significantly higher force. These data suggest that the mechanism of mechanical unfolding is conserved in proteins within the same fold family and demonstrate that although the topology and presence of a hydrogen-bonded clamp are of central importance in determining mechanical strength, hydrophobic interactions also play an important role in modulating the mechanical resistance of these similar proteins.

[1]  E. Evans,et al.  Sensitive force technique to probe molecular adhesion and structural linkages at biological interfaces. , 1995, Biophysical journal.

[2]  Jaime Prilusky,et al.  Automated analysis of interatomic contacts in proteins , 1999, Bioinform..

[3]  P. Kraulis A program to produce both detailed and schematic plots of protein structures , 1991 .

[4]  M. Karplus,et al.  Effective energy function for proteins in solution , 1999, Proteins.

[5]  D. Makarov,et al.  Ubiquitin-like Protein Domains Show High Resistance to Mechanical Unfolding Similar to That of the I27 Domain in Titin: Evidence from Simulations , 2004 .

[6]  Bojan Zagrovic,et al.  Solvent viscosity dependence of the folding rate of a small protein: Distributed computing study , 2003, J. Comput. Chem..

[7]  Michelle L. Scalley,et al.  Characterization of the free energy spectrum of peptostreptococcal protein L. , 1997, Folding & design.

[8]  A. Ikai,et al.  Mechanical unfolding of a2‐macroglobulin molecules with atomic force microscope , 1996 .

[9]  K. Schulten,et al.  Steered molecular dynamics simulations of force‐induced protein domain unfolding , 1999, Proteins.

[10]  G. I. Bell Models for the specific adhesion of cells to cells. , 1978, Science.

[11]  S. Radford,et al.  The effect of core destabilization on the mechanical resistance of I27. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[12]  L. Björck,et al.  Three-dimensional solution structure of an immunoglobulin light chain-binding domain of protein L. Comparison with the IgG-binding domains of protein G. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[13]  M. Rief,et al.  Single molecule force spectroscopy of spectrin repeats: low unfolding forces in helix bundles. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  A. Ikai,et al.  Unfolding mechanics of holo‐ and apocalmodulin studied by the atomic force microscope , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[15]  Hui Lu,et al.  The mechanical stability of ubiquitin is linkage dependent , 2003, Nature Structural Biology.

[16]  D. Baker,et al.  Contact order, transition state placement and the refolding rates of single domain proteins. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  E A Merritt,et al.  Raster3D Version 2.0. A program for photorealistic molecular graphics. , 1994, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[18]  Sheena E Radford,et al.  Mechanically unfolding proteins: The effect of unfolding history and the supramolecular scaffold , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[19]  D. Speicher,et al.  Forced unfolding modulated by disulfide bonds in the Ig domains of a cell adhesion molecule. , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  A. Oberhauser,et al.  Multiple conformations of PEVK proteins detected by single-molecule techniques , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  W. Kabsch,et al.  Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen‐bonded and geometrical features , 1983, Biopolymers.

[22]  The mechanical properties of human angiostatin can be modulated by means of its disulfide bonds: a single-molecule force-spectroscopy study. , 2002, Angewandte Chemie.

[23]  P K Hansma,et al.  Stepwise unfolding of titin under force-clamp atomic force microscopy. , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  E. Paci,et al.  Mechanical unfolding of a titin Ig domain: structure of transition state revealed by combining atomic force microscopy, protein engineering and molecular dynamics simulations. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[25]  Emanuele Paci,et al.  Pulling geometry defines the mechanical resistance of a β-sheet protein , 2003, Nature Structural Biology.

[26]  Hendrik Dietz,et al.  Exploring the energy landscape of GFP by single-molecule mechanical experiments. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  L. Björck Protein L. A novel bacterial cell wall protein with affinity for Ig L chains. , 1988, Journal of Immunology.

[28]  Matthias Rief,et al.  Sensing specific molecular interactions with the atomic force microscope , 1995 .

[29]  Mariano Carrion-Vazquez,et al.  The mechanical hierarchies of fibronectin observed with single-molecule AFM. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[30]  A. Ikai,et al.  Unfolding mechanics of multiple OspA substructures investigated with single molecule force spectroscopy. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[31]  A G Murzin,et al.  SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[32]  Jian-Min Yuan,et al.  Reversible mechanical unfolding of single ubiquitin molecules. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[33]  V. Daggett,et al.  Can non-mechanical proteins withstand force? Stretching barnase by atomic force microscopy and molecular dynamics simulation. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[34]  R. Merkel,et al.  Energy landscapes of receptor–ligand bonds explored with dynamic force spectroscopy , 1999, Nature.

[35]  Angelika A Noegel,et al.  A mechanical unfolding intermediate in an actin-crosslinking protein , 2004, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[36]  Jane Clarke,et al.  Hidden complexity in the mechanical properties of titin , 2003, Nature.

[37]  D Baker,et al.  Kinetics of folding of the IgG binding domain of peptostreptococcal protein L. , 1997, Biochemistry.

[38]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Native topology determines force-induced unfolding pathways in globular proteins. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  Klaus Schulten,et al.  Mechanical unfolding intermediates in titin modules , 1999, Nature.

[40]  Kevin W Plaxco,et al.  Protein folding: Defining a “standard” set of experimental conditions and a preliminary kinetic data set of two‐state proteins , 2005, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[41]  M Karplus,et al.  Forced unfolding of fibronectin type 3 modules: an analysis by biased molecular dynamics simulations. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[42]  Matthias Rief,et al.  The myosin coiled-coil is a truly elastic protein structure , 2002, Nature materials.

[43]  Jane Clarke,et al.  Mechanical unfolding of a titin Ig domain: structure of unfolding intermediate revealed by combining AFM, molecular dynamics simulations, NMR and protein engineering. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[44]  E. Evans Probing the relation between force--lifetime--and chemistry in single molecular bonds. , 2001, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[45]  H Li,et al.  Atomic force microscopy reveals the mechanical design of a modular protein. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  Hongbin Li,et al.  The unfolding kinetics of ubiquitin captured with single-molecule force-clamp techniques. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  Ferry Kienberger,et al.  A molecular switch between alternative conformational states in the complex of Ran and importin β1 , 2003, Nature Structural Biology.

[48]  G. Rodin,et al.  Relationship between the mechanical properties and topology of cross-linked polymer molecules: Parallel strands maximize the strength of model polymers and protein domains , 2003 .

[49]  Julio M Fernandez,et al.  Mechanical design of the first proximal Ig domain of human cardiac titin revealed by single molecule force spectroscopy. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[50]  P. Hansma,et al.  Kinetic Monte Carlo simulation of titin unfolding , 2001 .

[51]  D Baker,et al.  Biological Crystallography Structures of the B1 Domain of Protein L from Peptostreptococcus Magnus with a Tyrosine to Tryptophan Substitution , 2022 .

[52]  Vincent T. Moy,et al.  Molecular Basis for the Dynamic Strength of the Integrin α4β1/VCAM-1 Interaction , 2004 .

[53]  A. Oberhauser,et al.  Mechanical design of proteins studied by single-molecule force spectroscopy and protein engineering. , 2000, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[54]  Wolfgang A. Linke,et al.  Reverse engineering of the giant muscle protein titin , 2002, Nature.

[55]  J. Toca-Herrera,et al.  A simple method for probing the mechanical unfolding pathway of proteins in detail , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[56]  K. Schulten,et al.  Steered molecular dynamics and mechanical functions of proteins. , 2001, Current opinion in structural biology.

[57]  S. Radford,et al.  Force mode atomic force microscopy as a tool for protein folding studies , 2003 .

[58]  M. Graille,et al.  Immunoglobulin-binding domains: Protein L from Peptostreptococcus magnus. , 2003, Biochemical Society transactions.

[59]  J. Clarke,et al.  Mechanical and chemical unfolding of a single protein: a comparison. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[60]  A. Fersht,et al.  Transition-state structure as a unifying basis in protein-folding mechanisms: contact order, chain topology, stability, and the extended nucleus mechanism. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[61]  I R Vetter,et al.  Solid-state synthesis and mechanical unfolding of polymers of T4 lysozyme. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[62]  M. Saraste,et al.  States and transitions during forced unfolding of a single spectrin repeat , 2000, FEBS letters.

[63]  S. Bottomley,et al.  Complex between Peptostreptococcus magnus protein L and a human antibody reveals structural convergence in the interaction modes of Fab binding proteins. , 2001, Structure.

[64]  Evan Evans,et al.  Chemically distinct transition states govern rapid dissociation of single L-selectin bonds under force , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[65]  Hector H. Huang,et al.  Mechanical unfolding intermediates observed by single-molecule force spectroscopy in a fibronectin type III module. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[66]  D Baker,et al.  A breakdown of symmetry in the folding transition state of protein L. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.