Early and Sustained Supramarginal Gyrus Contributions to Phonological Processing

Reading is a difficult task that, at a minimum, requires recognizing a visual stimulus and linking it with its corresponding sound and meaning. Neurologically, this involves an anatomically distributed set of brain regions cooperating to solve the problem. It has been hypothesized that the supramarginal gyrus (SMG) contributes preferentially to phonological aspects of word processing and thus plays an important role in visual word recognition. Here, we used chronometric transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to investigate the functional specificity and timing of SMG involvement in reading visually presented words. Participants performed tasks designed to focus on either the phonological, semantic, or visual aspects of written words while double pulses of TMS (delivered 40 ms apart) were used to temporarily interfere with neural information processing in the left SMG at five different time windows. Stimulation at 80/120, 120/160, and 160/200 ms post-stimulus onset significantly slowed subjects’ reaction times in the phonological task. This inhibitory effect was specific to the phonological condition, with no effect of TMS in the semantic or visual tasks, consistent with claims that SMG contributes preferentially to phonological aspects of word processing. The fact that the effect began within 80–120 ms of the onset of the stimulus and continued for approximately 100 ms, indicates that phonological processing initiates early and is sustained over time. These findings are consistent with accounts of visual word recognition that posit parallel activation of orthographic, phonological, and semantic information that interact over time to settle into a distributed, but stable, representation of a word.

[1]  K. Müller,et al.  Functional architecture of verbal and tonal working memory: An FMRI study , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[2]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[3]  S. Rossi,et al.  Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[4]  M A Just,et al.  A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. , 1980, Psychological review.

[5]  Sophie K Scott,et al.  The neural response to changing semantic and perceptual complexity during language processing , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[6]  D. Long,et al.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A Neurochronometrics of Mind , 2004 .

[7]  Jason D Zevin,et al.  Dishabituation of the BOLD response to speech sounds , 2005, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[8]  C. Price,et al.  Functional Neuroanatomy of the Semantic System: Divisible by What? , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  Uri Eden,et al.  Biophysical foundations underlying TMS: Setting the stage for an effective use of neurostimulation in the cognitive neurosciences , 2009, Cortex.

[10]  B. Greenberg,et al.  What is transcranial magnetic stimulation? , 2003, The Harvard mental health letter.

[11]  E Borg,et al.  Acoustic trauma in extracranial magnetic brain stimulation. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Speaking of which: dissecting the neurocognitive network of language production in picture naming. , 2011, Cerebral cortex.

[13]  Katherine L. Wheat,et al.  During Visual Word Recognition, Phonology Is Accessed within 100 ms and May Be Mediated by a Speech Production Code: Evidence from Magnetoencephalography , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  Jianfeng Yang,et al.  Left fusiform BOLD responses are inversely related to word-likeness in a one-back task , 2011, NeuroImage.

[15]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2014, Neuromethods.

[16]  Alan P. Rudell,et al.  Unmasking human visual perception with the magnetic coil and its relationship to hemispheric asymmetry , 1993, Brain Research.

[17]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Computing the meanings of words in reading: cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. , 2004, Psychological review.

[18]  Jelliffe Vergleichende Lokalisationslehre der Grosshirnrinde , 1910 .

[19]  Y. Chen,et al.  The time-course of single-word reading: Evidence from fast behavioral and brain responses , 2012, NeuroImage.

[20]  R. Passingham,et al.  The Attentional Role of the Left Parietal Cortex: The Distinct Lateralization and Localization of Motor Attention in the Human Brain , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[21]  C. Price,et al.  Phonological decisions require both the left and right supramarginal gyri , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Derek K. Jones,et al.  Perisylvian language networks of the human brain , 2005, Annals of neurology.

[23]  A. Mechelli,et al.  Reading and reading disturbance , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[24]  Christoph M. Michel,et al.  New insights into the stroop effect: Spatio-temporal analysis of electric brain activity , 2000, NeuroImage.

[25]  Lisa D. Sanders,et al.  Skilled readers begin processing sub-phonemic features by 80ms during visual word recognition: Evidence from ERPs , 2009, Biological Psychology.

[26]  Nancy K. Squires,et al.  Phonological Processing and the Role of Strategy in Silent Reading: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Evidence , 1996, Brain and Language.

[27]  J. Pernier,et al.  ERP Manifestations of Processing Printed Words at Different Psycholinguistic Levels: Time Course and Scalp Distribution , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: the CDP+ model of reading aloud. , 2007, Psychological review.

[29]  S E Shaywitz,et al.  Neurobiological studies of reading and reading disability. , 2001, Journal of communication disorders.

[30]  Christian Beckmann,et al.  The Visual Word Form System in Context , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  P. Matthews,et al.  Semantic Processing in the Left Inferior Prefrontal Cortex: A Combined Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[32]  Kristi A. Kiyonaga,et al.  The time course of orthographic and phonological code activation. , 1993, Psychological science.

[33]  Chi-Hung Juan,et al.  Feedback to V1: a reverse hierarchy in vision , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[34]  Morten L. Kringelbach,et al.  Visual word recognition: the first half second , 2004, NeuroImage.

[35]  C. Price The anatomy of language: a review of 100 fMRI studies published in 2009 , 2010, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[36]  Richard Passingham,et al.  The Inferior Frontal Gyrus and Phonological Processing: An Investigation using rTMS , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[37]  Urs Maurer,et al.  Auditory Selective Attention to Speech Modulates Activity in the Visual Word Form Area , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[38]  James R. Booth,et al.  Development of Brain Mechanisms for Processing Orthographic and Phonologic Representations , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[39]  S. Petersen,et al.  A procedure for identifying regions preferentially activated by attention to semantic and phonological relations using functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[40]  Giulio Tononi,et al.  Evaluating the role of prefrontal and parietal cortices in memory-guided response with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[41]  G. Yovel,et al.  TMS Evidence for the Involvement of the Right Occipital Face Area in Early Face Processing , 2007, Current Biology.

[42]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Connection patterns distinguish 3 regions of human parietal cortex. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[43]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[44]  Alan Cowey,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation and cognitive neuroscience , 2000, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[45]  Joseph T. Devlin,et al.  Investigating Occipito-temporal Contributions to Reading with TMS , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[46]  Synnöve Carlson,et al.  Multisensory Integration of Sounds and Vibrotactile Stimuli in Processing Streams for “What” and “Where” , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[47]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Differential activation of right and left posterior sylvian regions by semantic and phonological tasks: a positron-emission tomography study in normal human subjects , 1994, Neuroscience Letters.

[48]  John F Connolly,et al.  Determining the role of phonology in silent reading using event-related brain potentials. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[49]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The TRACE model of speech perception , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[50]  Cathy J. Price,et al.  Top-down modulation of ventral occipito-temporal responses during visual word recognition , 2011, NeuroImage.

[51]  Matthew M Botvinick,et al.  Short-term memory for serial order: a recurrent neural network model. , 2006, Psychological review.

[52]  T Landis,et al.  Spatio-temporal analysis of electric brain activity during semantic and phonological word processing. , 1998, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[53]  Alan Cowey,et al.  Plasticity revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation of early visual cortex , 2000, Neuroreport.

[54]  Treebank Penn,et al.  Linguistic Data Consortium , 1999 .

[55]  D. Poeppel,et al.  The cortical organization of speech processing , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[56]  G. J. Romanes,et al.  The Neocortex of Macaca mulatta , 1948 .

[57]  R. Ulrich,et al.  Effects of truncation on reaction time analysis. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[58]  J. Rauschecker,et al.  Maps and streams in the auditory cortex: nonhuman primates illuminate human speech processing , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[59]  Russell A. Poldrack,et al.  In praise of tedious anatomy , 2007, NeuroImage.

[60]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. , 1996, Psychological review.

[61]  P. Skudlarski,et al.  Disruption of posterior brain systems for reading in children with developmental dyslexia , 2002, Biological Psychiatry.

[62]  Hartwig R. Siebner,et al.  The right posterior inferior frontal gyrus contributes to phonological word decisions in the healthy brain: Evidence from dual-site TMS , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[63]  J. Obleser,et al.  Expectancy constraints in degraded speech modulate the language comprehension network. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[64]  Sean L. Hill,et al.  Modeling the effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on cortical circuits. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[65]  James R. Booth,et al.  Effective brain connectivity in children with reading difficulties during phonological processing , 2008, Brain and Language.

[66]  C. Schroeder,et al.  A spatiotemporal profile of visual system activation revealed by current source density analysis in the awake macaque. , 1998, Cerebral cortex.

[67]  M. Posner,et al.  Establishing a time‐line of word recognition: evidence from eye movements and event‐related potentials , 1998, Neuroreport.

[68]  Nadim Joni Shah,et al.  Probabilistic fibre tract analysis of cytoarchitectonically defined human inferior parietal lobule areas reveals similarities to macaques , 2011, NeuroImage.

[69]  E Corthout,et al.  Timing of activity in early visual cortex as revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[70]  K. Rayner,et al.  Measuring word recognition in reading: eye movements and event-related potentials , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[71]  E. Wassermann Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5-7, 1996. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[72]  P. T. Fox,et al.  Positron emission tomographic studies of the cortical anatomy of single-word processing , 1988, Nature.

[73]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  The neural correlates of the verbal component of working memory , 1993, Nature.

[74]  Joseph T. Devlin,et al.  Supramarginal gyrus involvement in visual word recognition , 2009, Cortex.

[75]  Gary E. Raney,et al.  Eye movement control in reading: a comparison of two types of models. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[76]  J. Ashby,et al.  Prosodic phonological representations early in visual word recognition. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[77]  K. Hasan,et al.  Diffusion tensor quantification of the relations between microstructural and macrostructural indices of white matter and reading , 2011, Human brain mapping.

[78]  Gereon R. Fink,et al.  Supramodal Representation of Objects and Actions in the Human Inferior Temporal and Ventral Premotor Cortex , 2004, Cortex.

[79]  Costanza Papagno,et al.  The Neural Correlates of Phonological Short-term Memory: A Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[80]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Event-related potentials in phonological matching tasks , 1984, Brain and Language.

[81]  Asaid Khateb,et al.  Variability of fMRI activation during a phonological and semantic language task in healthy subjects , 2004, Human brain mapping.

[82]  K. Watkins,et al.  Stimulating language: insights from TMS. , 2007, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[83]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images , 2001, Medical Image Anal..

[84]  Rajeev D. S. Raizada,et al.  Selective Amplification of Stimulus Differences during Categorical Processing of Speech , 2007, Neuron.

[85]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.

[86]  Emily B. Myers,et al.  An event-related fMRI investigation of phonological–lexical competition , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[87]  Annette Kinder,et al.  Receiver operating characteristics in the lexical decision task: evidence for a simple signal-detection process simulated by the multiple read-out model. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[88]  Joseph T Devlin,et al.  How Does Learning to Read Affect Speech Perception? , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[89]  A. Nobre,et al.  Dissociating Linguistic Processes in the Left Inferior Frontal Cortex with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2022 .

[90]  F. Pulvermüller,et al.  Effects of word length and frequency on the human event-related potential , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[91]  C. Price,et al.  The Interactive Account of ventral occipitotemporal contributions to reading , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[92]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Testing an assumption of the E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control during reading: using event-related potentials to examine the familiarity check. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[93]  M Coltheart,et al.  DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. , 2001, Psychological review.

[94]  A. Pollatsek,et al.  The time course of orthography and phonology: ERP correlates of masked priming effects in Spanish. , 2009, Psychophysiology.

[95]  Emily B. Myers,et al.  An event-related fMRI investigation of phonological-lexical competition , 2004, Brain and Language.

[96]  W H Ehrenstein,et al.  Spatial coordinates of human auditory working memory. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[97]  D. Pandya,et al.  Distinct Parietal and Temporal Pathways to the Homologues of Broca's Area in the Monkey , 2009, PLoS biology.

[98]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Segregating Semantic from Phonological Processes during Reading , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[99]  Bradley R. Buchsbaum,et al.  The Search for the Phonological Store: From Loop to Convolution , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.