Assessment of reasonable opportunities for direct air capture

This work explores the possibility of using CO2 captured directly from the atmosphere for several applications that require low to moderate purities. Comparisons of the minimum and real work for separating CO2 from air, natural gas combined cycle flue gas and pulverized coal combustion flue gas are proposed and discussed. Although it is widely accepted that the separation of CO2 from air to high purity is more energy-intensive than separating CO2 from more concentrated sources, this study presents select cases where the separation of CO2 from air to low and moderate purities is energetically equivalent with the work required for flue gas CO2 separation. These energetically-competitive cases are shown to be dependent on the percent capture and final CO2 purity desired. In particular, several technologies can be considered as CO2 utilization opportunities in which dilute CO2 may be an adequate feedstock. Specifically, this study is focused on enhanced oil recovery and microalgae cultivation technologies, which appear to be the most beneficial near-term applications for utilization of CO2 from direct air capture.

[1]  I. Stirling,et al.  Ecological Dynamics Across the Arctic Associated with Recent Climate Change , 2009, Science.

[2]  Bingtao Zhao,et al.  Process effect of microalgal-carbon dioxide fixation and biomass production: A review , 2014 .

[3]  Edward S. Rubin,et al.  Cost and performance of fossil fuel power plants with CO2 capture and storage , 2007 .

[4]  S Pacala,et al.  Stabilization Wedges: Solving the Climate Problem for the Next 50 Years with Current Technologies , 2004, Science.

[5]  Rick Chalaturnyk,et al.  IEA GHG Weyburn CO2 monitoring and storage project , 2005 .

[6]  A. B. Rao,et al.  A technical, economic, and environmental assessment of amine-based CO2 capture technology for power plant greenhouse gas control. , 2002 .

[7]  J. Pires,et al.  Atmospheric CO2 capture by algae: Negative carbon dioxide emission path. , 2016, Bioresource technology.

[8]  Hiroyo Matsumoto,et al.  Influence of CO2, SO2 and NO in flue gas on microalgae productivity , 1997 .

[9]  M. Dong,et al.  Comparative Effectiveness of CO2 Produced Gas, and Flue Gas for Enhanced Heavy-Oil Recovery , 1999 .

[10]  Adam R. Brandt,et al.  Impact of alkalinity sources on the life-cycle energy efficiency of mineral carbonation technologies , 2012 .

[11]  Nathan Lewis,et al.  Direct Air Capture of CO2 with Chemicals: A Technology Assessment for the APS Panel on Public Affairs , 2011 .

[12]  Sarah Brennan,et al.  The urgency of the development of CO2 capture from ambient air , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Adam R. Brandt,et al.  CO2 mitigation potential of mineral carbonation with industrial alkalinity sources in the United States. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  Manya Ranjan,et al.  Economic and energetic analysis of capturing CO2 from ambient air , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  K. Mohanty,et al.  CO2 biofixation and carbonic anhydrase activity in Scenedesmus obliquus SA1 cultivated in large scale open system. , 2014, Bioresource technology.

[16]  Edward S Rubin,et al.  A technical, economic, and environmental assessment of amine-based CO2 capture technology for power plant greenhouse gas control. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.