Leader-Member Exchange Theory and Research: Accomplishments and Future Challenges

In the Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) theory of leadership, the quality of the exchange relationship between a leader and a particular member of a work unit, team or organization is the basic unit of analysis (dyad). In this article, we try to answer the question whether research on the various aspects of the exchange processes between leaders and their subordinates is consistent with the theoretical underpinnings of LMX theory. Our focus is on the similarities and differences between the theoretical assumptions of LMX theory and the way the core concepts are elaborated in empirical studies. Although LMX theory has resulted in a number of useful accomplishments, both theoretical and practical, it still faces a number of challenges. The main challenges are to carry out a thorough and consistent refinement of the measuring instruments used, and to gain more insight into the mutual behaviours, attributions, and evaluations which facilitate or inhibit the development of high-quality working relationships.

[1]  G. Graen,et al.  Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. , 1987 .

[2]  G. Graen,et al.  Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective , 1995 .

[3]  Chester A. Schriesheim,et al.  Exploring work unit context and leader–member exchange: a multi-level perspective , 2000 .

[4]  T. Scandura.  Rethinking leader-member exchange: An organizational justice perspective , 1999 .

[5]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[6]  R. J. House,et al.  The Social Scientific Study of Leadership: Quo Vadis? , 1997 .

[7]  Anne S. Tsui,et al.  Relational demography: The missing link in vertical dyad linkage. , 1995 .

[8]  George B. Graen,et al.  Role assimilation processes in a complex organization. , 1973 .

[9]  G. Graen,et al.  The effects of leader–member exchange and job design on productivity and satisfaction: Testing a dual attachment model. , 1982 .

[10]  Fred Dansereau,et al.  The Effect of Adding Items to Scales: An Illustrative Case of LMX , 2001 .

[11]  Jacqueline A-M. Coyle-Shapiro,et al.  Consequences of the psychological contract for the employment relationship: a large scale survey , 2000 .

[12]  Steve W. J. Kozlowski,et al.  Integration of climate and leadership: Examination of a neglected issue. , 1989 .

[13]  A. S. Phillips,et al.  Leader-follower exchange quality: the role of personal and interpersonal attributes. , 1994, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[14]  Neal M. Ashkanasy,et al.  Value Congruence in Leader-Member Exchange , 1997 .

[15]  Ronald J. Deluga,et al.  The relationship of subordinate upward influencing behaviour, satisfaction and perceived superior effectiveness with leader—member exchanges , 1991 .

[16]  F. Schoorman,et al.  A model of relational leadership: The integration of trust and leader–member exchange , 2000 .

[17]  P. Hersey,et al.  Life cycle theory of leadership. , 1979 .

[18]  K. Klein,et al.  Levels Issues in Theory Development, Data Collection, and Analysis , 1994 .

[19]  R. Stogdill.  Personal factors associated with leadership; a survey of the literature. , 1948, The Journal of psychology.

[20]  R. Burke,et al.  Leadership in organizations , 2006 .

[21]  W. Pierce,et al.  Social Concepts and Judgments: A Semantic Differential Analysis of the Concepts Feminist, Man, and Woman , 2003 .

[22]  Frank R. Hunsicker.  Contingency Approaches to Leadership , 1976 .

[23]  John M. Maslyn,et al.  Multidimensionafity of Leader-Member Exchange: An Empirical Assessment through Scale Development , 1998 .

[24]  G. Graen,et al.  A Role-Making Model of Leadership in Formal Organizations: A Developmental Approach , 1975 .

[25]  J. M. Kittross.  The measurement of meaning , 1959 .

[26]  R. J. House,et al.  Path-goal theory of leadership: Lessons, legacy, and a reformulated theory , 1996 .

[27]  J. Meindl.  Managing to Be Fair: An Exploration of Values, Motives, and Leadership , 1989 .

[28]  G. Graen.  Role-making processes within complex organizations , 1976 .

[29]  Gail T. Fairhurst,et al.  Social structure in leader‐member interaction , 1989 .

[30]  D. D. Steiner,et al.  The Role of the Initial Interaction in Leader-Member Exchange , 1990 .

[31]  Benson Rosen,et al.  The Leader-Member Exchange as a Link between Managerial Trust and Employee Empowerment , 2001 .

[32]  David D. Van Fleet,et al.  Theory and research on leadership in organizations. , 1992 .

[33]  George B. Graen,et al.  A Field Experimental Test of the Moderating Effects of Growth Need Strength on Productivity , 1986 .

[34]  D. Duchon,et al.  Vertical dyad linkage: A longitudinal assessment of antecedents, measures, and consequences. , 1986 .

[35]  T. Mitchell,et al.  Attributional processes of leaders in leader–member interactions. , 1979 .

[36]  Ellen A. Ensher,et al.  The Effects of Leader and Subordinate Characteristics in the Development of Leader–Member Exchange Quality1 , 1999 .

[37]  Aditi Mankad,et al.  Effective Leadership in Salient Groups: Revisiting Leader-Member Exchange Theory From the Perspective of the Social Identity Theory of Leadership , 2005, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[38]  Charlotte R. Gerstner,et al.  Meta-Analytic Review of Leader-Member Exchange Theory: Correlates and Construct Issues , 1997 .

[39]  R. Liden,et al.  Leader-Member Exchange Model of Leadership: A Critique and Further Development , 1986 .

[40]  Kenneth H. Blanchard,et al.  Great ideas revisited , 1996 .

[41]  Patricia M. Sias,et al.  Differential Superior-Subordinate Relations, Perceptions of Fairness, and Coworker Communication , 1995 .

[42]  Joni A. Graen,et al.  Global organizing designs , 2005 .

[43]  Kyle Lewis,et al.  Integrating Justice and Social Exchange: The Differing Effects of Fair Procedures and Treatment on Work Relationships , 2000 .

[44]  G. Graen,et al.  Moderating effects of initial leader–member exchange status on the effects of a leadership intervention. , 1984 .

[45]  George B. Graen,et al.  When managers decide not to decide autocratically: An investigation of leader–member exchange and decision influence. , 1986 .

[46]  W. E. Mcclane,et al.  Implications of Member Role Differentiation , 1991 .

[47]  Kenneth J. Harris,et al.  Too Much of a Good Thing: The Curvilinear Effect of Leader-Member Exchange on Stress , 2006, The Journal of social psychology.

[48]  R. J. House,et al.  A Path-Goal Theory of Leader Effectiveness , 1971 .

[49]  Birgit Schyns,et al.  Dyadic leadership and Organizational Outcomes- Different Results of Different instruments? , 2004 .

[50]  A. Schneider.  The Ideal Type of Authority in the United States and Germany , 2004 .

[51]  G. Graen,et al.  Dysfunctional leadership styles , 1972 .

[52]  Gerald R. Ferris,et al.  Influence tactics, affect, and exchange quality in supervisor-subordinate interactions: A laboratory experiment and field study. , 1990 .

[53]  D. Rousseau,et al.  Mutuality and reciprocity in the psychological contracts of employees and employers. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[54]  Ronald J. Deluga,et al.  The Role of Subordinate Performance and Ingratiation in Leader-Member Exchanges , 1994 .

[55]  Raymond T. Sparrowe,et al.  Leader-member exchange theory: The past and potential for the future. , 1997 .

[56]  Raymond T. Sparrowe,et al.  Developing Leader-Member Exchanges , 1994 .

[57]  Randall P. Settoon,et al.  Social Exchange in Organizations: Perceived Organizational Support, Leader-Member Exchange, and Employee Reciprocity , 1996 .

[58]  Carl E. Giese,et al.  Handbook of Leadership; a Survey of Theory and Research , 1974 .

[59]  J. Brockner,et al.  Predictors of survivors' job involvement following layoffs: A field study. , 1988 .

[60]  Edwin P. Hollander,et al.  Leadership and Social Exchange Processes , 1980 .

[61]  D. Baker,et al.  Leader Communication Style: A Test of Average Versus Vertical Dyad Linkage Models , 1985 .

[62]  Robert P. Vecchio,et al.  Influences on the quality of supervisor–subordinate relations: The role of time‐pressure, organizational commitment, and locus of control , 1994 .

[63]  Raymond T. Sparrowe,et al.  Process and Structure in Leader-Member Exchange , 1997 .

[64]  Robert P. Vecchio,et al.  The vertical dyad linkage model of leadership: Problems and prospects , 1984 .

[65]  Fred Dansereau,et al.  Leadership and Empowerment: A Social Exchange Perspective , 1995 .

[66]  C. Osgood.  Studies on the generality of affective meaning systems. , 1962 .

[67]  Jaesub Lee,et al.  Leader-Member Exchange, Perceived Organizational Justice, and Cooperative Communication , 2001 .

[68]  Kai Lamertz,et al.  The social construction of fairness: social influence and sense making in organizations , 2002 .

[69]  Development of Leader-Member Exchange: A Longitudinal Test , 1996 .

[70]  Mary Uhl-Bien,et al.  Examining the Link Between Leader Member Exchange and Subordinate Performance: The Role of Task Analyzability and Variety as Moderators , 1992 .

[71]  Vincent R. Waldron,et al.  Achieving Communication Goals in Superior-Subordinate Relationships: The Multi-Functionality of Upward Maintenance Tactics. , 1991 .

[72]  F. Dansereau.  A dyadic approach to leadership: Creating and nurturing this approach under fire , 1995 .

[73]  Mark J. Martinko,et al.  The Leader/Member Attribution Process , 1987 .

[74]  G. Graen,et al.  Generalizability of the vertical dyad linkage model of leadership. , 1980 .

[75]  Robert C. Liden,et al.  A longitudinal study on the early development of leader-member exchanges. , 1993 .

[76]  G. Graen,et al.  Leadership behaviors as cues to performance evaluation. , 1973 .

[77]  S. Green,et al.  Both Sides Now: Supervisor and Subordinate Perspectives on Relationship Quality , 2002 .

[78]  M. Hogg,et al.  Leader-member relations and social identity , 2003 .

[79]  Jan de Leeuw,et al.  Introducing Multilevel Modeling , 1998 .

[80]  C. Schriesheim,et al.  Leader–member exchange (LMX) research: A comprehensive review of theory, measurement, and data-analytic practices. , 1999 .

[81]  Thomas J. Naughton,et al.  Individualized leadership: A new multiple-level approach , 1995 .

[82]  William J. Haga,et al.  A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process , 1975 .

[83]  Shelley D. Dionne,et al.  Neutralizing substitutes for leadership theory: leadership effects and common-source bias. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[84]  W. van Breukelen,et al.  Effects of LMX and Differential Treatment on Work Unit Commitment , 2002, Psychological reports.

[85]  David G. Bowers,et al.  Predicting Organizational Effectiveness with a Four-Factor Theory of Leadership , 1966 .

[86]  Stephen G. Green,et al.  Demographic and organizational influences on leader–member exchange and related work attitudes. , 1996 .

[87]  R. Jong,et al.  Leader Member Exchanges: Distinction Between Two Factors , 1993 .

[88]  R. R. Blake,et al.  The Managerial Grid , 1994 .

[89]  M. Taylor,et al.  Aren't there two parties in an employment relationship? Antecedents and consequences of organization–employee agreement on contract obligations and violations , 2003 .

[90]  G. Yukl,et al.  An evaluative essay on current conceptions of effective leadership , 1999 .

[91]  William L. Hays,et al.  Theory Testing in Organizational Behavior: The Varient Approach. , 1985 .

[92]  K. Weick.  FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[93]  Mary Uhl-Bien,et al.  Reciprocity in Manager-Subordinate Relationships: Components, Configurations, and Outcomes , 2003 .

[94]  George B. Graen,et al.  Role of leadership in the employee withdrawal process. , 1982 .

[95]  Neville T. Duarte,et al.  How do I like thee? Let me appraise the ways , 1993 .