Optional Se -Constructions in Romance: Syntactic Encoding of Conceptual Information

[1]  Jaume Mateu,et al.  Conflation and incorporation processes in resultative constructions , 2012 .

[2]  Louise McNally,et al.  Telicity, change, and state : a cross-categorial view of event structure , 2012 .

[3]  Jaume Mateu,et al.  Bare nominals and argument structure in Catalan and Spanish , 2011 .

[4]  D. Basilico.  The se clitic and its relationship to paths , 2010 .

[5]  L. Nash,et al.  A higher applicative : Evidence from French , 2010 .

[6]  Jaume Mateu,et al.  Verb-particle constructions in Romance: A lexical-syntactic account , 2010 .

[7]  Jonathan E. MacDonald,et al.  The Lack of Spanish non-argumental clitic doubling , 2010 .

[8]  Jason D. Haugen.  Hyponymous objects and Late Insertion , 2009 .

[9]  M. Labelle.  The French reflexive and reciprocal se , 2008 .

[10]  Francesco D'Introno,et al.  Aspectos Sintácticos y Semánticos del pronombre SE , 2007 .

[11]  Richard S. Kayne.  Prepositions as Probes , 2007 .

[12]  Raffaella Folli,et al.  Causation, Obligation, and Argument Structure: On the Nature of Little v , 2007, Linguistic Inquiry.

[13]  T. Shopen,et al.  Language typology and syntactic description , 2013 .

[14]  Malka Rappaport Hovav,et al.  Towards a Uniform Theory of Valence-changing Operations , 2007 .

[15]  R. Folli,et al.  Benefactives aren't goals in Italian , 2006 .

[16]  Mara Frascarelli,et al.  PHASES OF INTERPRETATION , 2006 .

[17]  Florian Schäfer,et al.  The properties of anticausatives crosslinguistically , 2006 .

[18]  Andrew McIntyre,et al.  The interpretation of German datives and English have , 2006 .

[19]  T. Reinhart,et al.  The Lexicon-Syntax Parameter: Reflexivization and Other Arity Operations , 2005, Linguistic Inquiry.

[20]  L. Hellan,et al.  ARE REFLEXIVE CONSTRUCTIONS TRANSITIVE OR INTRANSITIVE ? EVIDENCE FROM GERMAN AND ROMANCE , 2005 .

[21]  Francesca Masini,et al.  Multi-word expressions between syntax and the lexicon : The case of Italian verb-particle constructions , 2005 .

[22]  Gillian Ramchand,et al.  Prepositions and Results in Italian and English: an Analysis from Event Decomposition , 2005 .

[23]  David Embick,et al.  On the Structure of Resultative Participles in English , 2004, Linguistic Inquiry.

[24]  Kyle Johnson,et al.  Double Objects Again , 2004, Linguistic Inquiry.

[25]  Jonathan E. MacDonald.  Spanish Reflexive Pronouns: A Null Preposition Hypothesis , 2004 .

[26]  J. Fontanals.  Argument structure: relational construal at the syntax-semantics interface , 2003 .

[27]  E. Anagnostopoulou.  The syntax of ditransitives : evidence from clitics , 2003 .

[28]  Maria Cristina Cuervo,et al.  Datives at large , 2003 .

[29]  V. Hacquard,et al.  On obligatory obligation: the composition of Italian causatives , 2003 .

[30]  Dieter Vermandere.  A unified analysis of French and Italian en / ne , 2002 .

[31]  Heidi Harley,et al.  Possession and the double object construction , 2002 .

[32]  K Abels,et al.  *[P clitic]! – Why? , 2001 .

[33]  Regine Eckardt.  Reanalysing selbst , 2001 .

[34]  A. Sorace.  Gradients in Auxiliary Selection with Intransitive Verbs. , 2000 .

[35]  Montserrat Sanz.  Events and Predication: A new approach to syntactic processing in English and Spanish , 2000 .

[36]  E. Aparicio,et al.  El operador aspectual "se" , 2000 .

[37]  A. Carnie,et al.  You ' re having me on ! : aspects of have , 2000 .

[38]  Beth Levin,et al.  Objecthood: An event structure perspective , 1999 .

[39]  La predicación: los complementos predicativos , 1999 .

[40]  Arnim von Stechow,et al.  Fast 'Almost' and the Visibility Parameter for Functional Adverbs , 1999, J. Semant..

[41]  Heidi Harley,et al.  State-of-the-Article: Distributed Morphology , 1999 .

[42]  Randy J. LaPolla,et al.  Syntax: Structure, Meaning, and Function , 1999 .

[43]  Arnim von Stechow,et al.  The Different Readings of Wieder 'Again': A Structural Account , 1996, J. Semant..

[44]  A. Kratzer.  Severing the External Argument from its Verb , 1996 .

[45]  Violeta Demonte,et al.  Dative alternation in Spanish , 1995 .

[46]  B. Levin.  Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface , 1994 .

[47]  Chiyo Nishida,et al.  The Spanish reflexive clitic se as an aspectual class marker , 1994 .

[48]  A. Marantz.  Implications of asymmetries in double object constructions , 1993 .

[49]  Morris Halle,et al.  Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection , 1993 .

[50]  Sam Mchombo.  Theoretical aspects of Bantu grammar , 1993 .

[51]  Bonet i Alsina,et al.  Morphology after syntax : pronominal clitics in romance , 1991 .

[52]  A. Cardinaletti,et al.  Partitive ne and the QP-hypothesis. A Case study , 1991 .

[53]  Arce Arenales,et al.  Semantic structure and syntactic function : the case of Spanish se , 1990 .

[54]  G. Cinque.  On si Constructions and the Theory of Arb , 1988 .

[55]  M. R. Manzini.  On Italian SI , 1986 .

[56]  Luigi Burzio,et al.  Italian Syntax: A Government-Binding Approach , 1986 .

[57]  M. Baltin,et al.  The Mental representation of grammatical relations , 1985 .

[58]  L. Talmy.  Lexicalisation patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms , 1985 .

[59]  M. Suñer.  Syntax and semantics of Spanish presentational sentence-types , 1982 .

[60]  Murray B. Emeneau,et al.  Defining a Linguistic Area: South Asia , 1978 .

[61]  Richard S. Kayne,et al.  French Syntax: The Transformational Cycle , 1975 .