An Initial Investigation of Factors Affecting Multi-Task Performance

Abstract : This report presents the results of the first in a series of investigations designed to increase fundamental knowledge and understanding of the factors affecting multi-task performance in a military environment. The primary objective of this laboratory experiment was to measure and quantify the effects of individual differences on human performance in a multi-task environment. The secondary objective was to observe the effects of previous computer experience and practice and to determine which relationships, if any, exist between personality and self-efficacy traits and multi-task performance. In this study, each of 76 civilian and military participants completed a battery of questionnaires designed to gather information about individual differences. Included were a demographics questionnaire that solicited information regarding age, gender, vision and hearing, military service, and computer use and experience; the Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire Form III which identifies five components of personality in five subscales including activity, aggression-hostility, sociability, neuroticism-anxiety, and impulsive risktaking; the polychronicity scale which measures the extent to which individuals prefer working on several tasks at once as opposed to working on only one task at a time; and the Situational Self-Efficacy (SSE) scale which measures the participants level of confidence in their ability to do a task well. After completion of the questionnaires, multi-task performance was measured using SYNWORK (Synthetic Work Environment), a computer-based synthetic work environment that runs on a personal computer or a laptop (Elsmore, 1994). Participants were required to work simultaneously on four distinct tasks that were presented on a computer screen: Sternberg memory, three-column addition, visual tracking, and signal discrimination. These tasks required continuous attention and involved memory, arithmetic processing, and visual and auditory monitoring.

[1]  B. Brocke,et al.  Biopsychological bases and behavioral correlates of sensation seeking: contributions to a multilevel validation , 1999 .

[2]  M. Zuckerman,et al.  A comparison of three structural models for personality: the big three , 1993 .

[3]  Henk G. Schmidt,et al.  Computer experience and computer anxiety , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[4]  Jerome H. Remick Co.,et al.  I'll Try Anything Once , 1911 .

[5]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Stress and human performance , 1996 .

[6]  T. Salthouse,et al.  Influence of Experience on Age Differences in Cognitive Functioning , 1990, Human factors.

[7]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychology Review.

[8]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency , 2024, Psihologìâ ì suspìlʹstvo.

[9]  V E Coon,et al.  Interpretation of differential deficits: the case of aging and mental arithmetic. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  R. Jayasuriya,et al.  A review of the construct of computer experience , 1999 .

[11]  R. W. Rogers,et al.  The Self-Efficacy Scale: Construction and Validation , 1982 .

[12]  M. Zuckerman,et al.  Sensation seeking and selective attention: focused and divided attention on a dichotic listening task. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  Arthur D. Fisk,et al.  Age-Related Performance in a Multiple-Task Environment , 1999, Hum. Factors.

[14]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSIS , 1991 .

[15]  John Todman,et al.  Effects of qualitative differences in initial and subsequent computer experience on computer anxiety , 2004, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[16]  Timothy F. Elsmore,et al.  SYNWORK1: A PC-based tool for assessment of performance in a simulated work environment , 1994 .

[17]  Allen C. Bluedorn,et al.  Polychronicity and the Inventory of Polychronic Values (IPV): The development of an instrument to measure a fundamental dimension of organizational culture , 1999 .

[18]  Linda T. Fatkin,et al.  Stress perceptions of soldiers participating in training at the Chemical Defense Training Facility: The mediating effects of motivation, experience, and confidence level. Final report , 1994 .

[19]  J. Mcdowd,et al.  The effects of age and extended practice on divided attention performance. , 1986, Journal of gerontology.

[20]  D. Schroeder,et al.  Use of Personality Assessment Measures in the Selection of Air Traffic Control Specialists , 2003 .

[21]  Elizabeth Boyle,et al.  The relationship between personality, approach to learning and academic performance , 2004 .

[22]  S. McKelvie,et al.  Is the Neuroticism Scale of the Eysenck Personality Inventory contaminated by response bias , 2004 .

[23]  J. E. Korteling,et al.  Effects of Aging, Skill Modification, and Demand Alternation on Multiple- Task Performance , 1994, Human factors.

[24]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[25]  T. Salthouse,et al.  Effects of adult age and working memory on reasoning and spatial abilities. , 1989, Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition.

[26]  J Sauer,et al.  Multiple-task performance on a computer-simulated life support system during a space mission simulation. , 1999, Acta astronautica.

[27]  Denise Potosky,et al.  A field study of computer efficacy beliefs as an outcome of training: the role of computer playfulness, computer knowledge, and performance during training , 2002, Comput. Hum. Behav..