Model‐based blind estimation of kinetic parameters in dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)‐MRI

A method to simultaneously estimate the arterial input function (AIF) and pharmacokinetic model parameters from dynamic contrast‐enhanced (DCE)‐MRI data was developed. This algorithm uses a parameterized functional form to model the AIF and k‐means clustering to classify tissue time‐concentration measurements into a set of characteristic curves. An iterative blind estimation algorithm alternately estimated parameters for the input function and the pharmacokinetic model. Computer simulations were used to investigate the algorithm's sensitivity to noise and initial estimates. In 12 patients with sarcomas, pharmacokinetic parameter estimates were compared with “truth” obtained from model regression using a measured AIF. When arterial voxels were included in the blind estimation algorithm, the resulting AIF was similar to the measured input function. The “true” Ktrans values in tumor regions were not significantly different than the estimated values, 0.99 ± 0.41 and 0.86 ± 0.40 min−1, respectively, P = 0.27. “True” kep values also matched closely, 0.70 ± 0.24 and 0.65 ± 0.25 min−1, P = 0.08. When only tissue curves free of significant vascular contribution are used (vp < 0.05), the resulting AIF showed substantial delay and dispersion consistent with a more local AIF such as has been observed in dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging in the brain. Magn Reson Med, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  C. Higgins,et al.  Inversion recovery EPI of bolus transit in rat myocardium using intravascular and extravascular gadolinium‐based MR contrast media: Dose effects on peak signal enhancement , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  D. Parker,et al.  Uncertainty and bias in contrast concentration measurements using spoiled gradient echo pulse sequences , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  V. Haughton,et al.  Automatic calculation of the arterial input function for cerebral perfusion imaging with MR imaging. , 2003, Radiology.

[4]  Fernando Calamante,et al.  Bolus dispersion issues related to the quantification of perfusion MRI data , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[5]  Magalie Viallon,et al.  Quantification of myocardial blood flow and blood flow reserve in the presence of arterial dispersion: A simulation study , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  David Dagan Feng,et al.  Simultaneous estimation of physiological parameters and the input function - in vivo PET data , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[7]  Glen R Morrell,et al.  Uncertainty in T1 mapping using the variable flip angle method with two flip angles , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  L. K. Hansen,et al.  Defining a local arterial input function for perfusion MRI using independent component analysis , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  Wan-Chi Siu,et al.  A technique for extracting physiological parameters and the required input function simultaneously from PET image measurements: theory and simulation study , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[10]  Richard Frayne,et al.  The impact of partial‐volume effects in dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance perfusion imaging , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  Wei Huang,et al.  Feasibility of using limited‐population‐based arterial input function for pharmacokinetic modeling of osteosarcoma dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI data , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  Gregory S Karczmar,et al.  Estimating the arterial input function using two reference tissues in dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI studies: Fundamental concepts and simulations , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  M. Knopp,et al.  Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast‐enhanced t1‐weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: Standardized quantities and symbols , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[14]  A. Jackson,et al.  Experimentally‐derived functional form for a population‐averaged high‐temporal‐resolution arterial input function for dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  Hai-Ling Margaret Cheng,et al.  Investigation and optimization of parameter accuracy in dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI , 2008, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[16]  Rong Zhou,et al.  Simultaneous measurement of arterial input function and tumor pharmacokinetics in mice by dynamic contrast enhanced imaging: Effects of transcytolemmal water exchange , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  Gregory S Karczmar,et al.  Multiple reference tissue method for contrast agent arterial input function estimation , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  Kenya Murase,et al.  Efficient method for calculating kinetic parameters using T1‐weighted dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  D. D. Billheimer,et al.  Repeatability of a reference region model for analysis of murine DCE‐MRI data at 7T , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[20]  Edward V. R. Di Bella,et al.  Estimation of kinetic parameters without input functions: analysis of three methods for multichannel blind identification , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  J. Gore,et al.  Quantitative pharmacokinetic analysis of DCE-MRI data without an arterial input function: a reference region model. , 2005, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[22]  Thomas E Yankeelov,et al.  Comparison of a reference region model with direct measurement of an AIF in the analysis of DCE‐MRI data , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.