Analysis and experimental study of patch tube mechanical properties based on screen pipe hydroforming patch technology

Hydroforming patch technology for damaged screen pipes is designed based on tube hydroforming technology, and the methods for determining the forming pressure range and forming defects are selected according to the forming process. The hydroforming patch model for screen pipes is established according to the technical demand parameters for screen pipe repair. From the mechanical properties of the material and digital–analog comparison analysis of the material formability, it is found that the determiners for formability (such as forming pressure, thinning rate, and springback) of 321 stainless steel (SS321) are better than those of 304L stainless steel (SS304L), and the patch tube materials meeting the technical requirements were selected. A test bench for the formability of patch tubes was built to verify the forming pressure of patch tubes with different thicknesses and the distribution of wall thickness after forming. The results show that the hydroforming patch technology is feasible and can realize the firm and close fit between the patch tube and screen pipe; moreover, SS321 can meet the material requirements of the patch tube.

[1]  S. Yuan,et al.  Analysis of thickness variation and stress state in hydroforming of complex T-shaped tubular part of nickel-based superalloy , 2021, Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering.

[2]  Hanxiang Wang,et al.  Theoretical analysis of pressure-bearing performance on compression packer in low permeability reservoirs , 2021 .

[3]  Kaikai Xu.  Silicon electro-optic micro-modulator fabricated in standard CMOS technology as components for all silicon monolithic integrated optoelectronic systems , 2021, Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering.

[4]  S. Kyriakides,et al.  Hydraulic expansion of lined pipe for offshore pipeline applications , 2021 .

[5]  Xiaohua Zhu,et al.  Prevention study on defective solid expandable tubular fracture , 2021, Engineering Failure Analysis.

[6]  Lin Li,et al.  Process analysis of biconvex tube hydroforming based on loading path optimization by response surface method , 2021, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[7]  Peng Ji,et al.  Study on the Erosion of Screen Pipe Caused by Sand-Laden Slurry , 2020 .

[8]  Shengjun Huang,et al.  Solid expandable tubular forming behavior based on twin shear stress yield criterion: Analytical, numerical simulation and experiment , 2020 .

[9]  A. K. Manshad,et al.  Optimization of perforated liner parameters in horizontal oil wells , 2020, Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology.

[10]  Xiaohua Zhu,et al.  Design and analysis of sealed suspension module based on solid expandable tubular repair technology , 2020 .

[11]  S. Nejadi,et al.  Effect of Slot Width and Density on Slotted Liner Performance in SAGD Operations , 2020, Energies.

[12]  Qiangzhong Xiao,et al.  A new laboratory protocol to study the plugging and sand control performance of sand control screens , 2020 .

[13]  Xinjiang Yan,et al.  Comprehensive experimental study on the sand retention media of pre-filled sand control screens , 2019, Particulate Science and Technology.

[14]  Yuanfang Cheng,et al.  Experimental study of sand control in a natural gas hydrate reservoir in the South China sea , 2019, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.

[15]  T. Christopher,et al.  Process Parameter Correlation in Low Pressure Hydro Forming of 6063-O Aluminium Tubes , 2019, Mechanics.

[16]  Feng Ying-ying,et al.  Loading path optimization of T tube in hydroforming process using response surface method , 2018, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[17]  Liu Naizhen,et al.  Subsection Optimization Method Research of Slotted Screen Liner Parameters for Horizontal Wells , 2018, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science.

[18]  Xianzhi Song,et al.  An integrated workflow to design screen/slotted liners in geothermal wells , 2018 .

[19]  Haitao Zhou,et al.  The effect of extrusion conditions on the properties and textures of AZ31B alloy , 2017 .

[20]  Shugen Xu,et al.  Experimental study of mechanical properties and residual stresses of expandable tubulars with a thread joint , 2017 .

[21]  F. Ozturk,et al.  Analysis of Contact Pressure of Mechanically Lined Corrosion Resistant Alloy Pipe by Hydraulic Expansion Process , 2017 .

[22]  L. Yang,et al.  Deformation behaviours of SS304 tubes in pulsating hydroforming processes , 2016 .

[23]  Liuan Wang,et al.  Hydroforming simulation and experiment of clad T-shapes , 2016 .

[24]  A. Bouzid,et al.  Analytical modeling of tube-to-tubesheet joints subjected to plastic deformation and creep , 2016 .

[25]  Gang Liu,et al.  Analysis on critical conditions of sidewall wrinkling for hydroforming of thin-walled Tee-joint , 2015 .

[26]  S. Kyriakides,et al.  Liner wrinkling and collapse of girth-welded bi-material pipe under bending , 2015 .

[27]  S. Yuan,et al.  Experimental verification of the influence of normal stress on the formability of thin-walled 5A02 aluminum alloy tubes , 2014 .

[28]  Abdelkhalak El-Hami,et al.  Global sensitivity analysis and multi-objective optimisation of loading path in tube hydroforming process based on metamodelling techniques , 2014 .

[29]  Seung Han Yang,et al.  Analysis of forming limit in tube hydroforming , 2013 .

[30]  Omar S. Al-Abri,et al.  Structural behavior of solid expandable tubular undergoes radial expansion process – Analytical, numerical, and experimental approaches , 2013 .

[31]  M. Keidar,et al.  Cold atmospheric plasma for the ablative treatment of neuroblastoma. , 2013, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[32]  Alfred Rotimi Akisanya,et al.  Cold hydraulic expansion of oil well tubulars , 2011 .

[33]  S. Jacques,et al.  Corrosion resistance of stainless steel pipes in soil , 2011 .