Data Based Framework to Identify the Most Significant Performance Shaping Factors in Railway Operations

Human performance is a major contributor to railway incidents and accidents. The literature shows that it is operators, i.e. train drivers, signallers and controllers, who mainly affect the railway system in terms of safety. Numerous studies have investigated the influence of such operators on the railway system, but are usually based on studies from other domains and cannot be reliably applied to railway specific operations. This paper presents a framework to identify the most significant human performance factors, known as Performance Shaping Factors (PSFs), which influence the performance of railway operators. These Railway-Performance Shaping Factors (R-PSFs) are derived from an extensive literature review, together with an analysis of 479 railway operational incidents and accidents over the past 15 years worldwide. Subject Matter Experts in the railway domain subsequently validated the identified factors. Statistical analysis of the railway operational incidents and accidents is subsequently conducted, following data quality checks. Based upon the Pareto principle, 12 R-PSFs account for more than 90% of the accidents and incidents, regardless of the severity of the event. Results from the analyses indicate the contribution of each individual R-PSF to the occurrence of a railway incident or accident, and highlight the importance of specific R-PSFs either individually or in combination for features related to specific types of accidents and incidents. The findings of the analysis can be used to direct resources more efficiently towards the development of sound solutions for improving the performance of railway operators. In addition, based upon the R-PSFs, a checklist of human performance factors is developed which can be used for investigation purposes and to collect human performance measures in a consistent and logical manner. The proposed checklist and its usage can greatly improve safety management systems of railway organisations.

[1]  A. Agresti.  An introduction to categorical data analysis , 1997 .

[2]  Arnab Majumdar,et al.  Metro Railway Safety: Analysis of Accident Precursors , 2012 .

[3]  Iain Ferguson.  The ORR railway management maturity model and its use in benchmarking safety and securing continued improvement , 2012 .

[4]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[5]  George Lee,et al.  Human factors in railway operations , 2008 .

[6]  Arnab Majumdar,et al.  Impact of European Railway Traffic Management System on Human Performance in Railway Operations , 2013 .

[7]  Richard Y. Wang,et al.  Data quality assessment , 2002, CACM.

[8]  Miltos Kyriakidis,et al.  Developing a human performance railway operational index to enhance safety of railway operations , 2013 .

[9]  K. Müller,et al.  The effect of an irregular shift system on sleepiness at work in train drivers and railway traffic controllers , 2002, Journal of sleep research.

[10]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision making with the analytic network process , 2013 .

[11]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .

[12]  Andrew W Evans,et al.  Fatal train accidents on Europe's railways: 1980-2009. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  Malte Hammerl,et al.  Human factors in the railway system safety analysis process , 2009 .

[14]  J. N. Sørensen,et al.  Safety culture: a survey of the state-of-the-art , 2002, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[15]  G. R. J. Hockey,et al.  The railway as a socio-technical system: Human factors at the heart of successful rail engineering , 2007 .

[16]  Dongping Fang,et al.  The nature of safety culture: A survey of the state-of-the-art , 2007 .

[17]  Watts S. Humphrey,et al.  Managing the software process , 1989, The SEI series in software engineering.

[18]  Gordon Brackstone,et al.  Managing data quality in a statistical agency , 2003 .

[19]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Cognitive reliability and error analysis method , 1998 .

[20]  Gudela Grote,et al.  Development and Assessment of Taxonomy for Performance-Shaping Factors for Railway Operations , 2012 .

[21]  Jürgen G. Backhaus,et al.  The Pareto Principle , 1980 .

[22]  Arnab Majumdar,et al.  Impact of European Railway Traffic Management System on Human Performance in Railway Operations European Findings , 2013 .

[23]  Mark C. Paulk,et al.  The Capability Maturity Model: Guidelines for Improving the Software Process , 1994 .

[24]  B. Kirwan,et al.  SLIM-MAUD: an approach to assessing human error probabilities using structured expert judgment. Volume I. Overview of SLIM-MAUD , 1984 .

[25]  Scott Gunderson,et al.  A scenario-based approach for requirements engineering: Experience in a telecommunication software development project , 2005 .

[26]  Daniel E Maurino.  ICAO SUPPORTS PROACTIVE APPROACH TO MANAGING HUMAN FACTORS ISSUES RELATED TO ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY , 1998 .

[27]  F. Guldenmund.  The nature of safety culture: a review of theory and research , 2000 .

[28]  Aircraft Ships space travel Vehicles.  Swiss Federal Railways , 2011 .

[29]  Katrina M. Groth,et al.  A DATA-INFORMED MODEL OF PERFORMANCE SHAPING FACTORS FOR USE IN HUMAN RELIABILITY ANALYSIS , 2009 .

[30]  Balbir S. Dhillon.  Human Reliability and Error in Transportation Systems , 2007 .

[31]  W Gibson,et al.  Incident Factor Classification System , 2013 .

[32]  Luis G. Vargas,et al.  Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process: Economic, Political, Social and Technological Applications with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs and Risks , 2013 .