Multi-objective discrete optimization of laminated structures

Abstract The paper is dedicated to the multi-objective optimal design of laminated composite structures. In order to provide sound-engineering designs, a few alternative and/or conflicting objectives must be taken into account. It is reasonable to consider the multi-objective optimization as a sensible enrichment with respect to single objective optimization, since the solutions are enforced to result optimal at the same time with respect to different objectives. Multi-objective optimization methods gained in the last years a growing interest in engineering, due to the possibility to determine a design possessing at the same time optimality with respect to different conflicting requirements. This problem is approached and suitably solved by Evolution Strategies, a computational algorithm based on Darwinian theories, that allow to solve optimization problems without using gradient-based information on the objective functions and the constraints. The presence of multiple objectives has been taken into account coupling the algorithm with a cooperative game theoretic approach and, for sake of comparison, with other methods, such as weighted objectives or Trade-off. With the game theoretic approach, all objective functions have the same importance, and the optimal solution is found using a bargaining function. The ply orientations in the stacking sequence of the laminate are the assumed design variables, of discrete type, a common situation in engineering practice. The results obtained for two different typical laminate designs show the effectiveness of the proposed method.

[1]  Ingo Rechenberg,et al.  Case studies in evolutionary experimentation and computation , 2000 .

[2]  W. Vent,et al.  Rechenberg, Ingo, Evolutionsstrategie — Optimierung technischer Systeme nach Prinzipien der biologischen Evolution. 170 S. mit 36 Abb. Frommann‐Holzboog‐Verlag. Stuttgart 1973. Broschiert , 1975 .

[3]  Dongkon Lee MULTIOBJECTIVE DESIGN OF A MARINE VEHICLE WITH AID OF DESIGN KNOWLEDGE , 1997 .

[4]  P. Hajela,et al.  Genetic search strategies in multicriterion optimal design , 1991 .

[5]  Giuseppe Giambanco,et al.  A design algorithm for the optimization of laminated composite structures , 1999 .

[6]  A. Dhingra,et al.  Single and multiobjective structural optimization in discrete‐continuous variables using simulated annealing , 1995 .

[7]  Mark Walker,et al.  Multiobjective optimization of laminated plates for maximum prebuckling, buckling and postbuckling strength using continuous and discrete ply angles , 1996 .

[8]  Santiago Hernández,et al.  Computer Aided Optimum Design of Structures V , 2001 .

[9]  Dimitris A. Saravanos,et al.  Multiobjective shape and material optimization of composite structures including damping , 1990 .

[10]  Bo P. Wang,et al.  Optimum design of a composite structure with three types of manufacturing constraints , 1991 .

[11]  Antonio Borri,et al.  Multicriteria optimization of laminated composite material structures , 1993 .

[12]  Ingo Rechenberg,et al.  Evolutionsstrategie : Optimierung technischer Systeme nach Prinzipien der biologischen Evolution , 1973 .

[13]  E. Reissner,et al.  On transverse bending of plates, including the effect of transverse shear deformation☆ , 1975 .

[14]  A. Dhingra,et al.  A genetic algorithm approach to single and multiobjective structural optimization with discrete–continuous variables , 1994 .

[15]  S. Tsai,et al.  Introduction to composite materials , 1980 .

[16]  Juhani Koski,et al.  Multicriteria Design Optimization , 1990 .

[17]  Charles Gide,et al.  Cours d'économie politique , 1911 .

[18]  C. Bert,et al.  The behavior of structures composed of composite materials , 1986 .