Thin Conductor Modelling Combined with a Hybrid Numerical Method to Evaluate the Transferred Potential from Isolated Grounding System

Grounding systems are essential parts of substations and power generation stations. The evaluation of transferred potentials from an active grounding system to other passive ones or to any near conductors is an important aspect to be considered, because transferred potentials may cause serious and fatal events. Moreover, it is an intrinsic issue of the Smart Grid where the ground systems of the power and ICT systems could be close to each other. Therefore, the estimation of the transferred potential is necessary at grounding system design stage for people safety and electric components safeguard. Numerical methods are the best choice to perform a truthful estimation, especially when large and complex grounding systems have to be designed. However, this task is complicated by the “unbounded” nature of the electromagnetic field and by the presence of components of extremely different size in the analysis domain. In this paper, an efficient hybrid finite element method is applied for the accurate and fast computation of transferred earth potentials from grounding systems. Moreover, the small dimensions of the components in the analysis domain are taken into account by the use of one-dimensional finite elements inserted in the tetrahedral mesh. It is worth mentioning the additional advantage of obtaining the electric potential on the earth surface without any post-processing operation.

[1]  F. Dawalibi,et al.  Transferred Earth Potentials in Power Systems , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[2]  David J. Bensted,et al.  Computer Analysis of Impedance Effects in Large Grounding Systems , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[3]  A. P. Meliopoulos,et al.  Analysis of ground potential gradients around power substations , 1990, Annual Technical Conference on Pulp and Paper Industry.

[4]  D. L. Garrett,et al.  A critical analysis of grounding practices for railroad tracks in electric utility stations , 1993 .

[5]  Salvatore Coco,et al.  Charge iteration: A procedure for the finite element computation of unbounded electrical fields , 1994 .

[6]  Mladen Trlep,et al.  The analysis of complex grounding systems by FEM , 1998 .

[7]  A. P. Sakis Meliopoulos,et al.  A COMPARISON OF IEC 479-1 AND IEEE STD 80 ON GROUNDING SAFETY CRITERIA , 1999 .

[8]  G. Borzi,et al.  An Overview Of The ELFIN Code For FiniteElement Research In Electrical Engineering , 1999 .

[9]  Nikos D. Hatziargyriou,et al.  Analysis of wind turbine grounding systems , 2000, 2000 10th Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference. Information Technology and Electrotechnology for the Mediterranean Countries. Proceedings. MeleCon 2000 (Cat. No.00CH37099).

[10]  Bojan Štumberger,et al.  The FEM-BEM analysis of complex grounding systems , 2003 .

[11]  Fermín Navarrina,et al.  Why do computer methods for grounding analysis produce anomalous results , 2003 .

[12]  J. A. Guemes,et al.  Method for calculating the ground resistance of grounding grids using FEM , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[13]  Fermín Navarrina,et al.  Boundary element formulation for the analysis of transferred potentials in electrical installations , 2004 .

[14]  Chien-Hsing Lee Safety assessment of bulk and traction supply substations in Taipei rail transit systems , 2004 .

[15]  I. Colominas,et al.  Analysis of transferred Earth potentials in grounding systems: a BEM numerical approach , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[16]  J.A. Guemes-Alonso,et al.  A practical approach for determining the ground resistance of grounding grids , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[17]  I. Colominas,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Transferred Potentials in Earthing Grids Considering Layered Soil Models , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[18]  S. Mangione,et al.  Safety Concerns on Ground Fault Application Transfer Phenomenon in HV Installations , 2007, 2007 IEEE Symposium on Product Compliance Engineering.

[19]  E. Dilettoso,et al.  A GMRES iterative solution of FEM‐BEM global systems in skin effect problems , 2008 .

[20]  S. Alfonzetti,et al.  A Non-Standard Family of Boundary Elements for the Hybrid FEM-BEM Method , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[21]  Hamid Zildzo,et al.  Numerical calculation of floating potentials for large earthing system , 2009, 2009 XXII International Symposium on Information, Communication and Automation Technologies.

[22]  Gao Lin,et al.  The scaled boundary finite element method applied to electromagnetic field problems , 2010 .

[23]  Albert R. Martin Safety issues and damage to equipment with both Smart Grid and home network connections , 2010, 2010 IEEE Symposium on Product Compliance Engineering Proceedings.

[24]  Giovanni Aiello,et al.  Improved Selection of the Integration Surface in the Hybrid FEM-DBCI Method , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[25]  V. C. Silva,et al.  Efficient Modeling of Thin Wires in a Lossy Medium by Finite Elements Applied to Grounding Systems , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[26]  Xiangyu Liu,et al.  Finite-difference analysis of the potential distribution around an L-shape building base under the measurement of grounding resistance , 2011, 2011 7th Asia-Pacific International Conference on Lightning.

[27]  Chih-Ju Chou,et al.  Assessment of Risks From Ground Fault Transfer on Closed-Loop HV Underground Distribution Systems With Cables Running in a Common Route , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[28]  Santi Agatino Rizzo,et al.  A comparison between hybrid methods: FEM-BEM versus FEM-DBCI , 2013 .

[29]  Fabio Freschi,et al.  Interferences phenomena between separate grounding systems , 2014 .

[30]  Luigi Martirano,et al.  Identification of Global Grounding Systems: The Global Zone of Influence , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[31]  Santi Agatino Rizzo,et al.  Efficient Analysis of Grounding Systems by Means of the Hybrid FEM–DBCI Method , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[32]  S. Paranthaman,et al.  Transferred Potential—A Hidden Killer of Many Linemen , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[33]  Enrico Pons,et al.  Global Earthing System: Can Buried Metallic Structures Significantly Modify the Ground Potential Profile? , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[34]  Manuel Casteleiro,et al.  Numerical Modeling of Grounding Systems for Aboveground and Underground Substations , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[35]  D. Garcia,et al.  Interaction Between Interconnected and Isolated Grounding Systems: A Case Study of Transferred Potentials , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[36]  Duane Leschert,et al.  Substation Grounding Transfer of Potential Case Studies , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[37]  Pedro Beirão,et al.  Influence of design parameters on the structural and fatigue behaviors of a floating point wave energy converter , 2017 .

[38]  Michela Longo,et al.  Particular grounding systems analysis using FEM models , 2018, 2018 18th International Conference on Harmonics and Quality of Power (ICHQP).

[39]  Jin Choi,et al.  Design Methods of Underwater Grounding Electrode Array by Considering Inter-Electrode Interference for Floating PVs , 2018 .

[40]  Elisa Francomano,et al.  On the distribution of lightning current among interconnected grounding systems in medium voltage grids , 2018 .

[41]  Gaetano Zizzo,et al.  On the Interconnections of HV–MV Stations to Global Grounding Systems , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[42]  M. Talaat,et al.  Simulation of the electric field and the GPR resulting from vertical-driven rods earthing system in a multi-layers earth structure , 2019, Measurement.