Subjects were asked to memorize a sequence of nine consonants which were grouped into three groups of three letters each (e.g., SBJ FQL ZNG). After learning the sequence, they were presented with single letters, letter pairs, or letter triples and asked to indicate if the probe item appeared in the memorized sequence. The latency results suggest that subjects engage in a linear self-terminating memory search in which the items from one chunk are retrieved from memory as the items from the immediately preceding chunk are being scanned. When the probe consisted of more than one item, the subjects were slowed in their comparison if the letters came from different chunks (e.g., JF vs. FQ in the above illustration), and the number of letters in the probe also influenced the reaction time. Neither of those effects were obtained if all the letters in the probe came from the same chunk, and that would seem to suggest that the probe items from the same chunk were compared in parallel to the letters in the memory item, while items from different chunks were compared serial.
[1]
K. Lashley.
The problem of serial order in behavior
,
1951
.
[2]
S. Sternberg.
Memory-scanning: mental processes revealed by reaction-time experiments.
,
1969,
American scientist.
[3]
G. Bower,et al.
Group structure, coding, and memory for digit series
,
1969
.
[4]
Neal F. Johnson,et al.
The Role of Chunking and Organization in The Process of Recall
,
1970
.
[5]
Neal F. Johnson,et al.
Transfer and retroaction under conditions of changed organization
,
1971
.
[6]
D. Homa.
Organization and long-term memory search
,
1973,
Memory & cognition.
[7]
Donald V. DeRosa,et al.
Retrieval of information from multiple ensembles in short-term memory
,
1974,
Memory & cognition.
[8]
S. Sternberg.
Memory Scanning: New Findings and Current Controversies
,
1975
.