Environmental life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis of domestic hot water systems in China

Abstract In this study, a cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment was conducted on several typical domestic hot water systems across five climatic regions of China. Variations of the climate and energy supply in these regions and the energy efficiency grade of domestic hot water systems were also taken into consideration. The results suggest that evacuated tube solar systems are highly energy-efficient and low-cost, except in the region with the weakest solar radiation. Electric systems are extremely energy-intensive and uneconomical for domestic hot water use, although they have the least human and ecological toxicity potentials. Solar and air-source energy systems save energy; however, they use more materials and cause more human and ecological toxicity. From the severe cold region to the hot summer and warm winter region, the heat load of domestic hot water increases by 59%, resulting in an increase of 58–230% in primary energy demand. Accordingly, the environmental impacts of domestic hot water systems increase in varying degrees; however, few impacts decrease due to the different emission factors of different power grids. The raw materials used in the manufacture of domestic hot water systems and the energy required for the use of the systems are the most important contributors to all environmental impacts. The scenario analysis indicates that 24.5% of the primary energy demand and 25.7% of greenhouse gas emissions owing to domestic hot water use in China can be reduced by improving the energy efficiency, prompting the use of renewable energy sources, and reducing the usage of materials for domestic hot water systems, as the human and ecological toxicity potentials will increase by 0.1% and 10%, respectively, due to the increasing use of certain materials.

[1]  Tarik Kousksou,et al.  Solar domestic heating water systems in Morocco: An energy analysis , 2015 .

[2]  A. Azapagic,et al.  Domestic solar thermal water heating: A sustainable option for the UK? , 2014 .

[3]  Steven K. Firth,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of a 100% solar fraction thermal supply to a European apartment building using water-based sensible heat storage , 2011 .

[4]  Gilles Notton,et al.  The environmental performance of a building-integrated solar thermal collector, based on multiple approaches and life-cycle impact assessment methodologies. , 2015 .

[5]  Christopher J. Koroneos,et al.  Life cycle environmental impact assessment of a solar water heater , 2012 .

[6]  Gang Li,et al.  Comprehensive investigations of life cycle climate performance of packaged air source heat pumps for residential application , 2015 .

[7]  Xuedan Zhang,et al.  A review of heat pump systems for heating and cooling of buildings in China in the last decade , 2015 .

[8]  Wei Liu,et al.  Life cycle assessment of lead-acid batteries used in electric bicycles in China , 2015 .

[9]  Zhaojie Cui,et al.  Life cycle assessment of end-of-life treatments of waste plastics in China , 2019, Resources, Conservation and Recycling.

[10]  Svend Svendsen,et al.  Technical, economic and environmental investigation of using district heating to prepare domestic hot water in Chinese multi-storey buildings , 2016 .

[11]  Juan Shi,et al.  Annual dynamic thermal performance of solar water heaters: A case study in China's Jiangsu Province , 2018, Energy and Buildings.

[12]  Parisa A. Bahri,et al.  Life cycle assessment of domestic hot water systems in Australia , 2017 .

[13]  I. Selvarasan,et al.  Economic analysis and environmental impact of flat plate roof mounted solar energy systems , 2017 .

[14]  W. Feng,et al.  Scenarios of energy efficiency and CO2 emissions reduction potential in the buildings sector in China to year 2050 , 2018, Nature Energy.

[15]  Not Indicated,et al.  International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook: Framework and Requirements for Life Cycle Impact Assessment Models and Indicators , 2010 .

[16]  Eric Johnson,et al.  Air-source heat pump carbon footprints: HFC impacts and comparison to other heat sources , 2011 .

[17]  Spiros Papaefthimiou,et al.  Comparative experimental Life Cycle Assessment of two commercial solar thermal devices for domestic applications , 2017 .

[18]  Ming Qu,et al.  Economic and environmental life cycle analysis of solar hot water systems in the United States , 2012 .

[19]  U. Berardi A cross-country comparison of the building energy consumptions and their trends , 2017 .

[20]  A. Azapagic,et al.  Life cycle environmental impacts of domestic solar water heaters in Turkey: The effect of different climatic regions. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[21]  B. Palm,et al.  Building heating solutions in China: A spatial techno-economic and environmental analysis , 2019, Energy Conversion and Management.

[22]  Björn Palm,et al.  Heating solutions for residential buildings in China: Current status and future outlook , 2018, Energy Conversion and Management.

[23]  Francesco Pomponi,et al.  Life cycle assessment of domestic hot water systems: a comparative analysis , 2016 .

[24]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  Domestic heat pumps: Life cycle environmental impacts and potential implications for the UK , 2012 .