Effects of Mobile Learning in English Language Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Research Synthesis

English has become the most important language for communication worldwide, but learning it as a second language presents multiple challenges. Given its multimedia nature, mobile learning is an ally in learning this language. However, although the use of mobile devices in English education has been broadly documented, there is little evidence of its effect on students’ learning. This article presents a meta-analysis of 62 studies to assess the effects of mobile learning on students’ learning. Moreover, the study considered the moderating effect of education level, pedagogical approach, learning environment, mobile device, and control treatment. The results show that mobile learning has a large effect (g=0.89) on students’ learning. Regarding education level, the best results were found at the Bachelor’s level. Similarly, collaborative learning provided the best results among the pedagogical approaches. As for the learning environment, semi-formal settings, such as field trips and outdoor activities, performed better than formal settings within classrooms or laboratories. Furthermore, smartphones yielded better results than any other mobile device. Finally, the results indicated that mobile learning produces better results than traditional lectures, traditional pedagogical tools, or other multimedia resources. Therefore, it should be promoted as a pedagogical alternative to foster quality education for all.

[1]  Jose Belda-Medina,et al.  The Impact of Augmented Reality (AR) on Vocabulary Acquisition and Student Motivation , 2023, Electronics.

[2]  Zhonggen Yu,et al.  Effects of mobile learning technologies and social media tools on student engagement and learning outcomes of English learning , 2022, Technology, Pedagogy and Education.

[3]  B. Reynolds,et al.  A Systematic Review of the Core Components of Language Learning Strategy Research in Taiwan , 2021, English Teaching & Learning.

[4]  Mohammad H. Al-khresheh,et al.  In Between 21st Century Skills and Constructivism in ELT: Designing a Model Derived From a Narrative Literature Review , 2021, World Journal of English Language.

[5]  Şahin Danişman,et al.  A meta-analysis of the impact of mobile learning on mathematics achievement , 2021, Education and Information Technologies.

[6]  Nurlaily Sofyan THE ROLE OF ENGLISH AS GLOBAL LANGUAGE , 2021, EDUKASI.

[7]  E. Mayo-Wilson,et al.  The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. , 2021, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[8]  Gunes Bolatli,et al.  The Effect of Mobile Learning on Student Success and Anxiety in Teaching Genital System Anatomy , 2021, Anatomical sciences education.

[9]  Kinshuk,et al.  How do pedagogical approaches affect the impact of augmented reality on education? A meta-analysis and research synthesis , 2020 .

[10]  R. V. D. Vlies Digital strategies in education across OECD countries , 2020 .

[11]  Weichao Chen,et al.  The effects of using mobile devices on language learning: a meta-analysis , 2020, Educational Technology Research and Development.

[12]  Jiyou Jia,et al.  The effects of using mobile devices on language learning: a meta-analysis , 2020, Educational Technology Research and Development.

[13]  J. Polanin,et al.  Methodological Guidance Paper: High-Quality Meta-Analysis in a Systematic Review , 2019, Review of Educational Research.

[14]  Tarik Talan,et al.  The Effect of Mobile Learning on Learning Performance: A Meta-Analysis Study , 2020, Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice.

[15]  J. Higgins,et al.  Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions , 2010, International Coaching Psychology Review.

[16]  Kevin Burden,et al.  Investigating the use of innovative mobile pedagogies for school-aged students: A systematic literature review , 2019, Comput. Educ..

[17]  Jiaosheng Qiu,et al.  A Preliminary Study of English Mobile Learning Model Based on Constructivism , 2019, Theory and Practice in Language Studies.

[18]  Juan Garzón,et al.  Meta-analysis of the impact of Augmented Reality on students’ learning gains , 2019, Educational Research Review.

[19]  Monther M. Elaish,et al.  Mobile English Language Learning (MELL): a literature review , 2019 .

[20]  Hanjong Park,et al.  Effects of Smartphone-Based Mobile Learning in Nursing Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. , 2019, Asian nursing research.

[21]  Huifen Lin,et al.  Mobile-assisted ESL/EFL vocabulary learning: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2019, Computer Assisted Language Learning.

[22]  Sungwoong Lee,et al.  The Effects of Using Mobile Devices on Student Achievement in Language Learning: A Meta-Analysis , 2018, Education Sciences.

[23]  Muneera Bano,et al.  Mobile learning for science and mathematics school education: A systematic review of empirical evidence , 2018, Comput. Educ..

[24]  Figen Kiliç,et al.  The Effect of Mobile-Assisted Language Learning Environment on EFL Students’ Academic Achievement, Cognitive Load and Acceptance of Mobile Learning Tools , 2018 .

[25]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis , 2018, Nature.

[26]  Servel Miller,et al.  Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) in Higher Education: Opportunities and Challenges , 2017 .

[27]  Liyana Shuib,et al.  Mobile Learning for English Language Acquisition: Taxonomy, Challenges, and Recommendations , 2017, IEEE Access.

[28]  Yao-Ting Sung,et al.  The Effects of Mobile-Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning: Meta-Analysis and Critical Synthesis , 2017, Review of educational research.

[29]  Amanda Wilson,et al.  A systematic literature review of games-based learning empirical evidence in primary education , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[30]  Evrim Baran,et al.  A Review of Research on Mobile Learning in Teacher Education , 2014, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[31]  Xiao-Hua Zhou,et al.  Statistical Methods for Meta‐Analysis , 2008 .

[32]  S. Morris Estimating Effect Sizes From Pretest-Posttest-Control Group Designs , 2008 .

[33]  Tania B. Huedo-Medina,et al.  Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index? , 2006, Psychological methods.

[34]  Larry V Hedges,et al.  The power of statistical tests for moderators in meta-analysis. , 2004, Psychological methods.

[35]  Richard P. DeShon,et al.  Combining effect size estimates in meta-analysis with repeated measures and independent-groups designs. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[36]  S Duval,et al.  Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis , 2000, Biometrics.

[37]  G. Smith,et al.  Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test , 1997, BMJ.

[38]  Mahesh S. Patel An introduction to meta-analysis. , 1989, Health policy.

[39]  Meng Chen The Impact of Mobile Learning on the Effectiveness of English Teaching and Learning—A Meta-Analysis , 2022, IEEE Access.

[40]  D. Burgos,et al.  Mobile English Learning: A Meta-analysis , 2022, International Conference on Advances in Web-Based Learning.

[41]  Blanka Frydrychova Klimova,et al.  Evaluating Impact of Mobile Applications on EFL University Learners' Vocabulary Learning - A Review Study , 2021, ANT/EDI40.

[42]  A. Figueiredo,et al.  Innovative pedagogical practices in higher education: An integrative literature review. , 2019, Nurse education today.

[43]  W. Thalheimer,et al.  How to calculate effect sizes from published research: A simplified methodology , 2002 .

[44]  R. Rosenthal Parametric measures of effect size. , 1994 .

[45]  Jacob Cohen QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN PSYCHOLOGY A Power Primer , 1992 .

[46]  G. Glass,et al.  Meta-analysis in social research , 1981 .

[47]  L. Cohen,et al.  Research Methods in Education , 1980 .

[48]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .