Forming tubular hexahedral screws—Process development by means of a combined finite element-boundary element approach

Abstract The aim of the present paper is twofold: first, to propose a new forming process that is capable of producing hexahedral heads with washers in tubular screws and, second, to present a numerical approach to solve the plastic deformation of the tubular preforms and the elastic deformation of the dies. The methodology draws from independent determination of mechanical properties and fabrication of prototypes with a forming tool designed and fabricated by the authors to the development of a direct boundary integral element formulation for solving the elastic deformation of the dies inside an existing in-house finite element computer program. The performance of the proposed forming process is assessed by experimentation and results and observations are explained in the light of the proposed numerical approach based on the combination of the finite element (FE) with the boundary element (BE) methods. Because project and design of tooling is often only dependent on boundary solutions for the elastic deformation of dies and for the contact between the workpiece and the dies, the proposed FE–BE approach seems as a cost-effective methodology that avoids discretization of dies by finite elements, reduces the overall size and improves the performance of the resulting computer models.

[1]  Thierry Coupez,et al.  Adaptive remeshing based on a posteriori error estimation for forging simulation , 2006 .

[2]  Mechanical Contact Experiments and Simulations , 2011 .

[3]  Paulo A.F. Martins,et al.  Revisiting the Fundamentals and Capabilities of the Stack Compression Test , 2011 .

[4]  Paulo A.F. Martins,et al.  Three‐dimensional finite element contact algorithm for metal forming , 1990 .

[5]  Paulo A.F. Martins,et al.  Simulation of three-dimensional bulk forming processes by finite element flow formulation , 2003 .

[6]  Paulo A.F. Martins,et al.  Simulation of plane strain rolling through a combined finite element–boundary element approach , 1999 .

[7]  S. Mukherjee,et al.  Boundary element techniques: Theory and applications in engineering , 1984 .

[8]  Richard Barrett,et al.  Templates for the Solution of Linear Systems: Building Blocks for Iterative Methods , 1994, Other Titles in Applied Mathematics.

[9]  T. A. Cruse,et al.  Numerical solutions in three dimensional elastostatics , 1969 .

[10]  S. Eisenstat Efficient Implementation of a Class of Preconditioned Conjugate Gradient Methods , 1981 .

[11]  Henk A. van der Vorst,et al.  Bi-CGSTAB: A Fast and Smoothly Converging Variant of Bi-CG for the Solution of Nonsymmetric Linear Systems , 1992, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[12]  Paulo A.F. Martins,et al.  Accuracy, reliability and validity of finite element analysis in metal forming: a user's perspective , 2009 .

[13]  P. K. Banerjee,et al.  Boundary element methods in engineering science , 1981 .

[14]  Paulo A.F. Martins,et al.  Three-dimensional simulation of flat rolling through a combined finite element-boundary element approach , 1999 .

[15]  B.-A. Behrens,et al.  Pierced forgings: tool development for a combined single step process , 2011, Prod. Eng..

[16]  Gregory Miller,et al.  Tube Forming Processes: A Comprehensive Guide , 2002 .